Turning the heart — setting the mind on the Buddha歸心
1The affairs of the three ages can be trusted
三世之事,信而有征,家世歸心,勿輕慢也。其間妙旨,具諸經論,不復於此,少能贊述;但懼汝曹猶未牢固,略重勸誘爾。
The affairs of the three ages can be trusted and have their proofs, and generation upon generation of this house has turned its heart to them. Do not make light of them. The fine meanings within are all set out in the sutras and the treatises, and I will not add my small word of praise here. I only fear that you are not yet firm, and so I roughly urge you once more.
2The inner teaching and the outer are one body at the root
原夫四塵五蔭,剖析形有;六舟三駕,運載群生:萬行歸空,千門入善,辯才智惠,豈徒七經、百氏之博哉?明非堯、舜、周、孔所及也。內外兩教,本為一體,漸積為異,深淺不同。內典初門,設五種禁;外典仁義禮智信,皆與之符。仁者,不殺之禁也;義者,不盜之禁也;禮者,不邪之禁也;智者,不酒之禁也;信者,不妄之禁也。至如畋狩軍旅,燕享刑罰,因民之性,不可卒除,就為之節,使不淫濫爾。歸周、孔而背釋宗,何其迷也!
Consider it. The four dusts (四塵) and the five aggregates (五蔭) break form and being open and look into them; the six boats (六舟) and the three carts (三駕) carry all living beings across. The ten thousand practices return to emptiness (空) and the thousand gates enter into the good (善). Does eloquence and wisdom like this stop at the breadth of the seven classics and the hundred schools? Plainly it is beyond what Yao and Shun and the Duke of Zhou and Confucius reached. The two teachings, the inner and the outer, were one body at the root. Little by little they gathered difference, and they are not of one depth. At the first gate of the inner books five prohibitions are set, and humaneness, right, ritual, wisdom and good faith in the outer books all answer to them. Humaneness is the prohibition against killing. Right is the prohibition against stealing. Ritual is the prohibition against what is lewd. Wisdom is the prohibition against drink. Good faith is the prohibition against false words. As for hunting and war, feasting and punishment, these follow the nature of the people and cannot be swept away at a stroke, so a measure is set for them so that they do not run to excess. To turn to the Duke of Zhou and Confucius and turn one's back on the school of Sakyamuni — how lost a thing that is.
3The five charges the world brings against the teaching
俗之謗者,大抵有五:其一,以世界外事及神化無方為迂誕也,其二,以吉凶禍福或未報應為欺誑也,其三,以僧尼行業多不精純為奸慝也,其四,以糜費金寶減耗課役為損國也,其五,以縱有因緣如報善惡,安能辛苦今日之甲,利益後世之乙乎?為異人也。今並釋之於下云。
The slanders of the world are broadly five. The first calls it wild and absurd that there are matters outside the world and divine changes without limit. The second calls it deceit that fortune and misfortune, blessing and calamity, sometimes fail to answer. The third calls it wickedness that the conduct of monks and nuns is often not pure. The fourth calls it harm to the state that gold and treasure are squandered and the tax and labor rolls drained. The fifth says that even granting there are causes and conditions, and that good and evil are answered, how can the man of today toil to profit some other man of a later age? They call it a different person. I will answer them all below.
4Answer one — men cannot measure even heaven and earth
釋一曰:夫遙大之物,寧可度量?今人所知,莫若天地。天為積氣,地為積塊,日為陽精,月為陰精,星為萬物之精,儒家所安也。星有墜落,乃為石矣;精若是石,不得有光,性又質重,何所系屬?一星之徑,大者百里,一宿首尾,相去數萬;百里之物,數萬相連,闊狹從斜,常不盈縮。又星與日月,形色同爾,但以大小為其等差;然而日月又當石也?石既牢密,烏兔焉容?石在氣中,豈能獨運?日月星辰,若皆是氣,氣體輕浮,當與天合,往來環轉,不得錯違,其間遲疾,理宜一等;何故日月五星二十八宿,各有度數,移動不均?寧當氣墜,忽變為石?地既滓濁,法應沈厚,鑿土得泉,乃浮水上;積水之下,復有何物?江河百谷,從何處生?東流到海,何為不溢?歸塘尾閭,渫何所到?沃焦之石,何氣所然?潮汐去還,誰所節度?天漢懸指,那不散落?水性就下,何故上騰?天地初開,便有星宿;九州未劃,列國未分,翦疆區野,若為躔次?封建已來,誰所制割?國有增減,星無進退,災祥禍福,就中不差;幹象之大,列星之夥,何為分野,止系中國?昴為旄頭,匈奴之次;西胡、東越,雕題、交址,獨棄之乎?以此而求,迄無了者,豈得以人事尋常,抑必宇宙外也?
Answer one. How can a thing far off and vast be measured? Of all that men know today, nothing is greater than heaven and earth. Heaven is gathered breath, earth is gathered clod, the sun is the essence of yang, the moon the essence of yin, the stars the essence of all things. This is what the Confucians rest in. But a star falls and becomes a stone. If the essence is stone it cannot have light, and its substance is heavy besides, so what does it hang from? One star at its largest is a hundred li across, and the head and the tail of a single lodging lie tens of thousands of li apart. A thing of a hundred li strung across tens of thousands, and its breadth and its slant never grow or shrink. And stars and sun and moon are the same in shape and color and differ in grade only by size. Then are the sun and the moon stones as well? Stone is hard and close packed, so how do the crow and the hare find room inside them? And if a stone sits within the breath, how could it turn alone? If sun and moon and stars are all breath, then the body of breath is light and floating and must join with heaven and come and go and circle round without going wrong, and their slowness and quickness should by reason be all of one measure. Why then do the sun and the moon and the five planets and the twenty-eight lodgings each have their own degrees and move unevenly? Is breath, when it falls, turned suddenly into stone? Earth is dregs and turbid, and by rule it should sink and lie thick, yet dig the soil and a spring comes out, so it floats upon water. And beneath the gathered water, what is there again? Where do the rivers and the streams and the hundred valleys come from? They flow east and reach the sea; why does it not overflow? It drains away through Guitang (歸塘) and Weilü (尾閭) — where does it go? By what breath does the stone of Wojiao (沃焦) burn? Who measures out the going and the returning of the tides? The River of Heaven hangs there; why does it not scatter and fall? Water by its nature goes downward; why does it climb? When heaven and earth first opened, the lodgings were there already. The nine provinces were not yet drawn and the states not yet divided; by what, then, were the cutting of borders and the parting of the fields matched to the lodgings? Since the setting up of the fiefs, who has divided and fixed them? States grow and shrink, but the stars neither advance nor retreat, and yet calamity and omen, blessing and misfortune, do not go wrong within it. The image of heaven is great and the ranked stars are many. Why then are the allotted fields (分野) tied to the Middle Kingdom alone? The Mao lodging is the Maotou (旄頭), the place of the Xiongnu. Are the Western Hu and the Eastern Yue, Diaoti and Jiaozhi, thrown away alone? Search it out this way and no one ever comes to the end of it. How then can a man take the common run of human affairs and hold it certain that there is nothing outside the universe?
5Men who doubt whatever lies past ear and eye
凡人之信,唯耳與目;耳目之外,咸致疑焉。儒家說天,自有數義:或渾或蓋,乍宣乍安。鬥極所周,管維所屬,若所親見,不容不同;若所測量,寧足依據?何故信凡人之臆說,迷大聖之妙旨,而欲必無恒沙世界、微塵數劫也?而鄒衍亦有九州之談。山中人不信有魚大如木,海上人不信有木大如魚;漢武不信弦膠,魏文不信火布;胡人見錦,不信有蟲食樹吐絲所成;昔在江南,不信有千人氈帳,及來河北,不信有二萬斛船:皆實驗也。
What ordinary men trust is the ear and the eye alone, and beyond ear and eye they doubt everything. The Confucians speaking of heaven have several doctrines of their own: now that heaven wraps around, now that it covers like a lid, now that it is boundless space, now that it stands at rest. The circling of the Dipper and the pole, and what the axis and its cord (管維) are fastened to — if these were seen with their own eyes they could not differ so; and if they were reckoned by measurement, how are they enough to rest on? Why then trust the guesses of ordinary men and lose the way among the fine meanings of the great sage, and wish to hold it certain that there are no worlds numberless as the sands of the Ganges and no kalpas numberless as motes of dust? Even Zou Yan had his talk of nine provinces. The man in the mountains does not believe there are fish as big as trees; the man by the sea does not believe there are trees as big as fish. Emperor Wu of Han did not believe in the bowstring glue (弦膠), and Emperor Wen of Wei did not believe in the fire cloth (火布). The Hu, seeing brocade, did not believe that a worm eats a tree and spits out thread to make it. Long ago in Jiangnan I did not believe there were felt tents that hold a thousand men, and after I came to Hebei I did not believe there were ships of twenty thousand hu. All of these were proved to me.
6If human hands can do this, what of divine power
世有祝師及諸幻術,猶能履火蹈刃,種瓜移井,倏忽之間,十變五化。人力所為,尚能如此;何況神通感應,不可思量,千里寶幢,百由旬座,化成凈土,踴出妙塔乎?
There are sorcerers in the world, and many arts of illusion, and they can walk on fire and tread on blades, plant a melon and move a well, and in a moment change ten times and twenty. If what human strength does is already like this, how much more the divine powers and the answering of prayer, which cannot be measured — the jeweled banner (寶幢) a thousand li high, the seat a hundred yojanas wide, the turning of a place into a pure land, the marvelous stupa leaping up out of the ground.
7Answer two — the recompense is late, not absent
釋二曰:夫信謗之徵,有如影響;耳聞目見,其事已多,或乃精誠不深,業緣未感,時儻差闌,終當獲報耳。善惡之行,禍福所歸。九流百氏,皆同此論,豈獨釋典為虛妄乎?項橐、顏回之短折,伯夷、原憲之凍餒,盜跖、莊蹻之福壽,齊景、桓魋之富強,若引之先業,冀以後生,更為通耳。如以行善而偶鐘禍報,為惡而儻值福征,便生怨尤,即為欺詭;則亦堯、舜之雲虛,周、孔之不實也,又欲安所依信而立身乎?
Answer two. The proofs of belief and of slander are like shadow and echo, and the things heard with the ear and seen with the eye are already many. Sometimes a man's sincerity is not deep, or the bond of his deeds has not yet drawn its answer, and though the time runs out of course he receives the recompense in the end. Good conduct and bad are what blessing and calamity return to. The nine streams and the hundred schools all hold this same argument. Why call the Buddhist books alone empty and false? Xiang Tuo and Yan Hui cut off young, Bo Yi and Yuan Xian cold and hungry, Robber Zhi and Zhuang Qiao blessed and long of life, Duke Jing of Qi and Huan Tui rich and strong — draw these back to the deeds of an earlier life and look to a life to come, and they make better sense still. But if a man does good and happens to meet calamity, or does evil and happens to meet blessing, and at once resents it and calls it a cheat, then Yao and Shun are empty words too and the Duke of Zhou and Confucius are not real, and on what will he lean and trust and set up his life?
8Answer three — is the learner's idleness the fault of the teaching?
釋三曰:開闢已來,不善人多而善人少,何由悉責其精絜乎?見有名僧高行,棄而不說;若睹凡僧流俗,便生非毀。且學者之不勤,豈教者之為過?俗僧之學經律,何異世人之學詩、禮?以詩、禮之教,格朝廷之人,略無全行者;以經律之禁,格出家之輩,而獨責無犯哉?且闕行之臣,猶求祿位;毀禁之侶,何慚供養乎?其於戒行,自當有犯。一披法服,已墮僧數,歲中所計,齋講誦持,比諸白衣,猶不啻山海也。
Answer three. Since the world was opened there have been many men who are not good and few who are, so how can purity be demanded of them all? Men see a famed monk of high conduct and put him aside and say nothing, and when they see a common monk who follows the ways of the world they bring out their slander at once. And if the learner is not diligent, how is that the teacher's fault? A common monk studying the sutras and the discipline — how does it differ from a man of the world studying the Shi jing and the Li ji? Measure the men of the court by the teaching of the Shi and the Li, and there is hardly one who carries it out whole. Shall those who have left the household be measured by the prohibitions of sutra and discipline, and shall they alone be required never to transgress? Besides, a minister whose conduct falls short still seeks salary and office; why should a company that has broken the prohibitions be ashamed to take offerings? In their keeping of the precepts there will of course be transgressions. But once a man has put on the robe of the law and is counted among the monks, what he keeps through the year — the fasts, the expounding, the reciting, the holding to it — set against those in white clothes, the distance is no less than between a mountain and the sea.
9Answer four — seeking the way is the body's plan, sparing the cost is the state's
釋四曰:內教多途,出家自是其一法耳。若能誠孝在心,仁惠為本,須達、流水,不必剃落鬚髮;豈令罄井田而起塔廟,窮編戶以為僧尼也?皆由為政不能節之,遂使非法之寺,妨民稼穡,無業之僧,空國賦算,非大覺之本旨也。抑又論之:求道者,身計也;惜費者,國謀也。身計國謀,不可兩遂。誠臣徇主而棄親,孝子安家而忘國,各有行也。儒有不屈王侯高尚其事,隱有讓王辭相避世山林;安可計其賦役,以為罪人?若能偕化黔首,悉入道場,如妙樂之世,禳佉之國,則有自然稻米,無盡寶藏,安求田蠶之利乎?
Answer four. The inner teaching has many roads, and leaving the household is only one method among them. If sincerity and filial duty are in the heart and humaneness and kindness are made the root, then like Sudatta (須達) and Jalavahana (流水) a man need not shave off beard and hair. Why should all the field land be emptied to raise stupas and monasteries, or every registered household be used up to make monks and nuns? All this comes of a government that could not set a measure, until at last monasteries against the law hinder the people's farming and monks without a calling empty the state's tax rolls. That is not the root meaning of the Great Awakened One. Consider it further. To seek the way is the plan of one's own person; to spare the cost is the plan of the state. The plan of the person and the plan of the state cannot both be carried through. A sincere minister follows his lord and gives up his parents; a filial son settles his house and forgets the state. Each has what he acts on. Among the Confucians are men who do not bend to king or lord and hold their calling high; among the hidden men are those who refused a throne and declined the chancellorship and fled the world into mountain and forest. How can their tax and their labor be counted up and they be called offenders? And if all the black-haired people could be transformed together and enter the place of the way, so that it were like the world of Wondrous Joy (妙樂) or the land of Sankha (禳佉), then there would be rice that grows of itself and treasure houses without end. Who would seek the profit of field and silkworm then?
10Answer five — the later body is my body too
釋五曰:形體雖死,精神猶存。人生在世,望於後身似不相屬;及其歿後,則與前身似猶老少朝夕耳。世有魂神,示現夢想,或降童妾,或感妻孥,求索飲食,征須福佑,亦為不少矣。今人貧賤疾苦,莫不怨尤前世不修功業;以此而論,安可不為之作地乎?夫有子孫,自是天地間一蒼生耳,何預身事?而乃愛護,遺其基址,況於己之神爽,頓欲棄之哉?凡夫蒙蔽,不見未來,故言彼生與今非一體耳;若有天眼,鑒其念念隨滅,生生不斷,豈可不怖畏邪?又君子處世,貴能克己復禮,濟時益物。治家者欲一家之慶,治國者欲一國之良,仆妾臣民,與身竟何親也,而為勤苦修德乎?亦是堯、舜、周、孔虛失愉樂耳。一人修道,濟度幾許蒼生?免脫幾身罪累?幸熟思之!汝曹若觀俗計,樹立門戶,不棄妻子,未能出家;但當兼修戒行,留心誦讀,以為來世津梁。人生難得,無虛過也。
Answer five. The body dies, but the spirit remains. While a man lives in the world he looks toward his later body as though it had nothing to do with him; but once he is dead, its tie to the earlier body is like that of age to youth, or evening to morning. There are souls in the world that show themselves in dreams, or come down upon a child or a concubine, or move a wife and children, asking for food and drink and begging for blessing and help, and these are not few. When men today are poor and low and sick and in pain, there is none who does not resent that he built no merit in a former life. Argue from this, and how can a man not prepare a place for what is to come? A man's sons and grandsons are of themselves only so many living creatures between heaven and earth. What have they to do with his own person? Yet he cherishes and guards them and leaves them his foundation. How much less, then, should he throw away his own spirit at a stroke. Ordinary men are covered over and do not see what is to come, and so they say that the life there and this life are not one body. If a man had the heavenly eye and saw how thought after thought passes away and life after life does not break off, how could he not be afraid? And a gentleman living in the world holds it precious to master himself and return to ritual, to help his age and profit others. He who governs a house wants the whole house blessed; he who governs a state wants the whole state good. Servants and concubines, ministers and people — what kinship have they with his own person, that he should toil and suffer and cultivate virtue for their sake? By that reckoning Yao and Shun and the Duke of Zhou and Confucius merely threw away their pleasure for nothing. When one man cultivates the way, how many living beings does he carry across? How many bodies does he free from guilt and burden? Think it through well, I beg you. If you look to the reckoning of the world, and set up a household, and cannot give up wife and children, and so cannot leave the household, then cultivate the precepts alongside it and set your heart on reciting and reading, and make of that a ford and a bridge to the life to come. A human birth is hard to get. Do not pass it in vain.
11Keep far from the taking of life
儒家君子,尚離庖廚,見其生不忍其死,聞其聲不食其肉。高柴、折像,未知內教,皆能不殺,此乃仁者自然用心。含生之徒,莫不愛命;去殺之事,必勉行之。好殺之人,臨死報驗,子孫殃禍,其數甚多,不能悉錄耳,且示數條於末。
Even the gentleman of the Confucians keeps away from the kitchen. Having seen the creature alive he cannot bear to see it die, and having heard its cry he will not eat its flesh. Gao Chai and Zhe Xiang knew nothing of the inner teaching, and both could refrain from killing. This is the natural working of a humane man's heart. Of the company that holds life there is none that does not love its own. The putting away of killing — strive to do it. Men who love killing meet the proof of it when they die, and their sons and grandsons take the calamity. Such cases are very many and cannot all be set down, but I will show a few at the end.
12The man who washed his hair with egg white
梁世有人,常以雞卵白和沐,云使髮光,每沐輒二三十枚。臨死,髮中但聞啾啾數千雞雛聲。
In the time of Liang there was a man who always mixed the white of eggs into his hair wash, saying that it made the hair shine, and he used twenty or thirty eggs each time he washed. When he died, all that could be heard in his hair was the cheeping of several thousand chicks.
13The house that sold eel soup
江陵劉氏,以賣鱔羹為業。後生一兒頭是鱔,自頸以下,方為人耳。
A Liu of Jiangling made his living selling eel soup. Later he had a son whose head was that of an eel, and only from the neck down was he a man.
14The sheep that ran into a guest's robe
王克為永嘉郡守,有人餉羊,集賓欲燕。而羊繩解,來投一客,先跪兩拜,便入衣中。此客竟不言之,固無救請。須臾,宰羊為羹,先行至客。一臠入口,便下皮內,周行遍體,痛楚號叫;方復說之。遂作羊鳴而死。
When Wang Ke was grand warden of Yongjia, someone sent him a sheep, and he gathered guests for a feast. But the sheep's rope came loose, and it ran to one of the guests, knelt and bowed twice before him, and went inside his clothes. This guest said nothing of it to the end, and made no plea for the sheep to be spared. Before long the sheep was killed and made into soup, and the soup came first to that guest. One piece went into his mouth and at once went down under his skin and traveled all through his body, until in his pain he cried out, and only then did he tell what had happened. In the end he made the cry of a sheep and died.
15The ox that came to the steps and bowed
梁孝元在江州時,有人為望蔡縣令,經劉敬躬亂,縣廨被焚,寄寺而住。民將牛酒作禮,縣令以牛繫旛柱,屏除形像,鋪設床坐,於堂上接賓。未殺之頃,牛解,徑來至階而拜,縣令大笑,命左右宰之。飲噉醉飽,便臥檐下。稍醒而覺體癢,爬搔隱疹,因爾成癩,十許年死。
When Emperor Xiaoyuan of Liang was at Jiangzhou, a man was made magistrate of Wangcai county. The revolt of Liu Jinggong had passed through, the county office had been burned, and he lodged in a monastery. When the people brought an ox and wine to pay their respects, the magistrate tied the ox to the banner pole, cleared away the images, spread out couch and mats, and received his guests in the hall. Just before it was killed the ox came loose and came straight to the steps and bowed. The magistrate laughed aloud and ordered his attendants to butcher it. He ate and drank until he was drunk and full, and lay down under the eaves. As he sobered a little he felt his body itch, and scratching it he raised a rash, and from that he came to have leprosy, and after ten years or so he died.
16The son of the retainer who cut off hands
楊思達為西陽郡守,值侯景亂,時復旱儉,饑民盜田中麥。思達遣一部曲守視,所得盜者,輒截手腕,凡戮十餘人。部曲後生一男,自然無手。
When Yang Sida was grand warden of Xiyang commandery, the revolt of Hou Jing came, and there was drought and dearth as well, and the starving people stole barley from the fields. Yang Sida sent one of his retainers to keep watch, and every thief he caught had his wrist cut off; more than ten men were maimed in all. Later that retainer had a son, and the boy was born with no hands.
17The man who said an ox tasted right only when he killed it himself
齊有一奉朝請,家甚豪侈,非手殺牛,噉之不美。年三十許,病篤,大見牛來,舉體如被刀刺,叫呼而終。
In Qi there was a man of the post of fengchaoqing whose house was very rich and lavish, and he used to say that unless he killed the ox with his own hand the eating of it had no savor. At a little over thirty he fell gravely ill, and he saw oxen coming in great numbers, and his whole body felt as though it were stabbed with knives, and he died crying out.
18Gao Wei, who caught fish
江陵高偉,隨吾入齊,凡數年,向幽州澱中捕魚。後病,每見群魚嚙之而死。
Gao Wei of Jiangling came with me into Qi, and for several years he caught fish in the marshes of Youzhou. Later he fell ill, and he kept seeing shoals of fish biting him, and so he died.
19The parents-in-law who curse the bride's parents
世有癡人,不識仁義,不知富貴並由天命。為子娶婦,恨其生資不足,倚作舅姑之尊,蛇虺其性,毒口加誣,不識忌諱,罵辱婦之父母,卻成教婦不孝己身,不顧他恨。但憐己之子女,不愛己之兒婦。如此之人,陰紀其過,鬼奪其算。慎不可與為鄰,何況交結乎?避之哉!
There are foolish people in the world who do not know humaneness and right, and do not know that wealth and rank all come from the mandate of Heaven. They take a wife for their son and then resent that what she brings is too little, and leaning on the honor of being father-in-law and mother-in-law, with a nature venomous as a snake, they add slander to a poisonous mouth. Knowing nothing they should shrink from, they curse and abuse the bride's parents, and so they teach the bride to be unfilial to them, and never look to the hatred they make in another. They pity only their own son and daughter and have no love for their own son's wife. Of such people the dark world writes down the fault, and the spirits take away their span of years. Be careful not even to live next door to them, much less to bind yourself to them. Keep clear of them.