Treacherous and Murderous Ministers奸劫弑臣
凡姦臣皆欲順人主之心以取親幸之勢者也。是以主有所善,臣從而譽之;主有所憎,臣因而毁之。凡人之大體,取舍同者則相是也,取舍異者則相非也。今人臣之所譽者,人主之所是也,此之謂同取;人臣之所毁者,人主之所非也,此之謂同舍。夫取舍合而相與逆者,未嘗聞也。此人臣之所以取信幸之道也。夫姦臣得乘信幸之勢以毁譽進退羣臣者,人主非有術數以御之也,非參驗以審之也,必將以曩之合己信今之言,此幸臣之所以得欺主成私者也。故主必欺於上而臣必重於下矣,此之謂擅主之臣。
All treacherous ministers wish to follow the ruler's heart and so gain the standing of one who is close to him and favored. Therefore, when the ruler finds something good, the minister praises it along with him; when the ruler hates something, the minister tears it down along with him. The broad shape of people is this: those whose taking and discarding are the same approve of each other, and those whose taking and discarding differ condemn each other. Now what the minister praises is what the ruler approves, and this is called taking alike; what the minister tears down is what the ruler condemns, and this is called discarding alike. That men should agree in what they take and discard and yet go against each other has never been heard of. This is the road by which a minister gains trust and favor. When a treacherous minister rides the standing of trust and favor and by tearing down and praising advances and removes the host of ministers, and the ruler has no art and method for handling him and no cross-checking to examine him, the ruler is sure to trust today's words because of yesterday's agreement with himself. This is how a favored minister comes to deceive his ruler and accomplish his private ends. So the ruler is surely deceived above and the minister surely grows weighty below. Such a one is called a minister who takes the ruler for his own.
國有擅主之臣,則羣下不得盡其智力以陳其忠,百官之吏不得奉法以致其功矣。何以明之?夫安利者就之,危害者去之,此人之情也。今爲臣盡力以致功,竭智以陳忠者,其身困而家貧,父子罹其害;爲姦利以弊人主,行財貨以事貴重之臣者,身尊家富,父子被其澤;人焉能去安利之道而就危害之處哉?治國若此其過也,而上欲下之無姦,吏之奉法,其不可得亦明矣。故左右知貞信之不可以得安利也,必曰:「我以忠信事上,積功勞而求安,是猶盲而欲知黑白之情,必不幾矣;若以道化行正理,不趍富貴,事上而求安,是猶聾而欲審清濁之聲也,愈不幾矣。二者不可以得安,我安能無相比周、蔽主上、爲姦私以適重人哉?」此必不顧人主之義矣。其百官之吏亦知方正之不可以得安也,必曰:「我以清廉事上而求安,若無規矩而欲爲方圓也,必不幾矣;若以守法不朋黨治官而求安,是猶以足搔頂也,愈不幾也。二者不可以得安,能無廢法行私以適重人哉?」此必不顧君上之法矣。故以私爲重人者衆,而以法事君者少矣。是以主孤於上而臣成黨於下,此田成之所以弑簡公者也。
When a state has a minister who takes the ruler for his own, then those below cannot use up their wisdom and strength to lay out their loyalty, and the clerks of the hundred offices cannot uphold the law and bring their work to completion. How is this made clear? To go toward what is safe and profitable and to leave what is dangerous and harmful is the nature of people. Now the man who as a minister uses up his strength to achieve merit and exhausts his wisdom to lay out his loyalty is worn down in his own person, his household is poor, and father and son suffer the harm of it. The man who works treacherous profit to blind his ruler and spends goods and money to serve the honored and weighty ministers is exalted in his own person, his household is rich, and father and son receive the bounty of it. How, then, can a man leave the road that is safe and profitable and go toward the place that is dangerous and harmful? To govern a state as wrongly as this and still to want no treachery below and clerks who uphold the law — plainly this cannot be had. So the men at the ruler's side know that being upright and trustworthy cannot win them safety and profit, and they are sure to say: "For me to serve my superior with loyalty and good faith, piling up merit and toil to seek safety, is like being blind and wanting to know black from white. It is surely hopeless. And to be transformed by the Way, to practice right principle and not chase wealth and rank, and so to serve my superior and seek safety, is like being deaf and wanting to sort a clear note from a muddy one. It is more hopeless still. Since neither of these can win safety, how can I help but band together with others, blind the ruler above, and work treachery for myself to fit the minister of heavy power?" Such men will surely not look to their ruler's righteousness. The clerks of the hundred offices likewise know that being square and correct cannot win them safety, and they are sure to say: "For me to serve my superior with clean hands and seek safety is like wanting to make squares and circles with no compass and no square. It is surely hopeless. And to keep the law, join no faction, order my office and seek safety, is like scratching the top of my head with my foot. It is more hopeless still. Since neither of these can win safety, how can I help but set the law aside and act for myself to fit the minister of heavy power?" Such men will surely not look to their lord's law. So those who serve a minister of heavy power for private ends are many, and those who serve their ruler by law are few. Thus the ruler is alone above and the ministers form their faction below. This is how Tian Cheng came to kill Duke Jian.
Interlinear notes 1
The base text has 盲 and 聾; they are rendered in present-day words. — translator
夫有術者之爲人臣也,得效度數之言,上明主法,下困姦臣,以尊主安國者也。是以度數之言得效於前,則賞罰必用於後矣。人主誠明於聖人之術,而不苟於世俗之言,循名實而定是非,因參驗而審言辭。是以左右近習之臣,知僞詐之不可以得安也,必曰:「我不去姦私之行,盡力竭智以事主,而乃以相與比周妄毀譽以求安,是猶負千鈞之重䧟於不測之淵而求生也,必不幾矣。」百官之吏亦知爲姦利之不可以得安也,必曰:「我不以清廉方正奉法,乃以貪汙之心枉法以取私利,是猶上高陵之顛墮峻谿之下而求生,必不幾矣。」安危之道若此其明也,左右安能以虚言惑主,而百官安敢以貪漁下?是以臣得陳其忠而不弊,下得守其職而不怨。此管仲之所以治齊,而商君之所以强秦也。
When a man who has the art serves as a minister, he offers up words of measure and method, above making his ruler's law clear and below straitening treacherous ministers, and so he honors the ruler and settles the state. Therefore, when words of measure and method are offered up beforehand, reward and punishment are surely used afterward. Let the ruler be truly clear in the art of the sage and not careless with the words of the age, settling right and wrong by name and substance and examining speech by cross-checking. Then the intimate and familiar ministers at his side know that falsehood and deceit cannot win them safety, and they are sure to say: "If I do not leave off treacherous and private conduct and use up my strength and wisdom to serve my ruler, but instead band together with others and tear down and praise at random to seek safety, it is like carrying a thousand jun on my back, sinking into a fathomless pool, and asking to live. It is surely hopeless." The clerks of the hundred offices know too that working treacherous profit cannot win them safety, and they are sure to say: "If I do not uphold the law with clean and square hands, but with a greedy and filthy heart bend the law to take private profit, it is like climbing to the top of a high ridge, falling down a steep ravine, and asking to live. It is surely hopeless." When the road of safety and danger is as clear as this, how can the men at his side confuse the ruler with empty words, and how can the hundred offices dare to be greedy and fleece those below? So the minister lays out his loyalty and is not blinded, and those below keep to their duties and bear no grudge. This is how Guan Zhong governed Qi and how Lord Shang made Qin strong.
從是觀之,則聖人之治國也,固有使人不得不愛我之道,而不恃人之以愛爲我也。恃人之以愛爲我者危矣,恃吾不可不爲者安矣。夫君臣非有骨肉之親,正直之道可以得利,則臣盡力以事主;正直之道不可以得安,則臣行私以干上。明主知之,故設利害之道,以示天下而已矣。夫是以人主雖不口教百官,不目索姦衺,而國已治矣。人主者,非目若離婁乃爲明也,非耳若師曠乃爲聰也。目必不任其數,而待目以爲明,所見者少矣,非不弊之術也。耳必不因其勢,而待耳以爲聰,所聞者寡矣,非不欺之道也。明主者,使天下不得不爲己視,天下不得不爲己聽。故身在深宮之中而明照四海之内,而天下弗能蔽弗能欺者,何也?闇亂之道廢而聰明之勢興也。故善任勢者國安,不知因其勢者國危。古秦之俗,君臣廢法而服私,是以國亂兵弱而主卑。商君說秦孝公以變法易俗而明公道,賞告姦,困末作而利本事。當此之時,秦民習故俗之有罪可以得免,無功可以得尊顯也,故輕犯新法。於是犯之者其誅重而必,告之者其賞厚而信,故姦莫不得而被刑者衆,民疾怨而衆過日聞。孝公不聽,遂行商君之法。民後知有罪之必誅,而告私姦者衆也,故民莫犯,其刑無所加。是以國治而兵强,地廣而主尊。此其所以然者,匿罪之罰重而告姦之賞厚也。此亦使天下必爲己視聽之道也。至治之法術已明矣,而世學者弗知也。
Seen from this, when the sage governs a state he has from the first a road that makes men unable not to love him, and he does not rely on men acting for him out of love. To rely on men acting for you out of love is dangerous; to rely on their being unable not to act is safe. Ruler and minister have no closeness of flesh and bone. If the straight and upright road can win profit, the minister uses up his strength to serve his ruler; if the straight and upright road cannot win safety, the minister works for himself and offends against his superior. The enlightened ruler knows this, and so he sets out the road of profit and harm and shows it to the world, and that is all. Thus, though the ruler does not teach the hundred offices with his mouth and does not hunt out treachery with his eyes, the state is already in order. A ruler is not clear-sighted because his eyes are like Li Lou's, and not keen of hearing because his ears are like Shi Kuang's. If the eye does not entrust itself to method and he waits on his eye to be clear-sighted, what he sees is little, and that is no art for staying unblinded. If the ear does not follow the force of things and he waits on his ear to be keen, what he hears is scant, and that is no road for staying undeceived. The enlightened ruler makes the world unable not to see for him and unable not to hear for him. So his body is deep within the palace, yet his brightness lights up all within the four seas, and the world can neither blind him nor deceive him. Why? The road of darkness and disorder has been abolished and the force of clear sight and keen hearing has risen. So the one who is good at trusting to the force of things has a settled state, and the one who does not know how to follow that force has a state in danger. In the old customs of Qin, ruler and ministers set the law aside and served their private ends, and so the state was disordered, its soldiers weak, and its ruler low. Lord Shang urged Duke Xiao of Qin to change the laws and alter the customs and make the common way clear, to reward those who reported treachery, to straiten the work of the branches and profit the work of the root. At that time the people of Qin were used to the old custom, where a man with a crime could still get off and a man without merit could still be honored and made known, and so they broke the new laws lightly. Then those who broke them were cut down heavily and without fail, and those who reported them were rewarded richly and surely, and so no treachery went undiscovered and many suffered punishment. The people were sick with resentment and their many complaints were heard day after day, but Duke Xiao did not listen and carried through the laws of Lord Shang. Afterward the people knew that a crime was surely cut down and that those who reported private treachery were many, and so the people did not offend and the punishments had nowhere to fall. Thus the state was in order and its soldiers strong, its land broad and its ruler honored. The reason it was so is that the penalty for hiding a crime was heavy and the reward for reporting treachery was rich. This too is the road to making the world see and hear for you without fail. The law and art of the highest government are already clear, and the learned men of the age do not know it.
且夫世之愚學,皆不知治亂之情,讘䛟多誦先古之書,以亂當世之治;智慮不足以避穽井之陷,又妄非有術之士。聽其言者危,用其計者亂,此亦愚之至大而患之至甚者也。俱與有術之士有談說之名,而實相去千萬也,此夫名同而實有異者也。夫世愚學之人比有術之士也,猶螘垤之比大陵也,其相去遠矣。而聖人者,審於是非之實,察於治亂之情也。故其治國也,正明法,陳嚴刑,將以救羣生之亂,去天下之禍,使强不陵弱,衆不暴寡,耆老得遂,幼孤得長,邊境不侵,君臣相親,父子相保,而無死亡係虜之患,此亦功之至厚者也!愚人不知,顧以爲暴。愚者固欲治而惡其所以治,皆惡危而喜其所以危者。何以知之?夫嚴刑重罰者,民之所惡也,而國之所以治也;哀憐百姓輕刑罰者,民之所喜,而國之所以危也。聖人爲法國者,必逆於世而順於道德。知之者,同於義而異於俗;弗知之者,異於義而同於俗。天下知之者少,則義非矣。
Moreover, the foolish learning of the age knows nothing of the true state of order and disorder, yet it babbles away, reciting much from the books of high antiquity, and so disorders the government of the present day. Its wisdom and forethought are not enough even to keep it from falling into a pit, and still it wrongly condemns the man who has the art. He who listens to such words is in danger, and he who uses such plans falls into disorder. This too is the greatest of follies and the worst of troubles. Such men share with the man who has the art the name of one who talks and expounds, but in substance they are ten million miles apart; here the name is the same and the substance differs. To set a man of the age's foolish learning beside a man who has the art is like setting an anthill beside a great hill; they stand far apart. The sage examines the substance of right and wrong and looks into the true state of order and disorder. So in governing a state he makes the law correct and clear and sets out stern punishments, meaning thereby to rescue the living multitude from disorder and rid the world of calamity, to keep the strong from riding down the weak and the many from doing violence to the few, so that the old may live out their years and the young and orphaned may grow, the borders may go unraided, ruler and minister be close to each other, and father and son keep each other safe, with no dread of death or capture. This too is the richest of merits. The foolish do not know it and take it for violence instead. The foolish man truly wants order and hates what brings order; every one of them hates danger and delights in what brings danger. How do I know it? Stern punishments and heavy penalties are what the people hate, yet they are what brings a state to order; pitying the people and lightening punishments is what the people delight in, yet it is what brings a state into danger. When the sage makes law for a state, he is sure to go against the age and to follow the Way and its power. Those who understand it agree with righteousness and differ from custom; those who do not understand it differ from righteousness and agree with custom. When few in the world understand it, righteousness is called wrong.
處非道之位,被衆口之譖,溺於當世之言,而欲當嚴天子而求安,幾不亦難哉!此夫智士所以至死而不顯於世者也。楚莊王之弟春申君有愛妾曰余,春申君之正妻子曰甲。余欲君之弃其妻也,因自傷其身以視君而泣,曰:「得爲君之妾,甚幸。雖然,適夫人非所以事君也,適君非所以事夫人也。身故不肖,力不足以適二主,其勢不俱適,與其死夫人所者,不若賜死君前。妾以賜死,若復幸於左右,願君必察之,無爲人笑。」君因信妾余之詐,爲弃正妻。余又欲殺甲而以其子爲後,因自裂其親身衣之裏,以示君而泣,曰:「余之得幸君之日久矣,甲非弗知也,今乃欲强戲余。余與爭之,至裂余之衣,而此子之不孝,莫大於此矣。」君怒,而殺甲也。故妻以妾余之詐弃,而子以之死。從是觀之,父之愛子也,猶可以毁而害也。君臣之相與也,非有父子之親也,而羣臣之毁言,非特一妾之口也,何怪夫賢聖之戮死哉!此商君之所以車裂於秦,而吳起之所以枝解於楚者也。凡人臣者,有罪固不欲誅,無功者皆欲尊顯。而聖人之治國也,賞不加於無功,而誅必行於有罪者也。然則有術數者之爲人也,固左右姦臣之所害,非明主弗能聽也。
To stand in a place that is not of the Way, to bear the slander of many mouths, to be drowned in the talk of the present age, and then to face a stern Son of Heaven and seek safety — is this not hard! This is why a man of wisdom goes to his death without ever being known in the world. Chunshen, the younger brother of King Zhuang of Chu, had a beloved concubine named Yu (余), and the son of his proper wife was named Jia (甲). Yu wished her lord to cast off his wife, so she wounded her own body and showed it to her lord and wept, saying: "To be my lord's concubine is great good fortune. Even so, to fit myself to the lady is no way to serve my lord, and to fit myself to my lord is no way to serve the lady. I am unworthy from the first, and my strength is not enough to fit two masters; as things stand I cannot fit them both. Rather than die in the lady's quarters, better that death be granted me before my lord. Once your handmaid has been granted death, if someone at your side should come into favor again, I beg my lord to look into it well and not become a laughingstock." Her lord then believed the concubine Yu's deceit and cast off his proper wife. Yu wished also to kill Jia and make her own son the heir, so she tore the lining of the robe next to her skin and showed it to her lord and wept, saying: "Jia cannot but know how long I have had my lord's favor, and now he would force his sport upon me. I struggled with him until my robe was torn. No unfilial act of this child is greater than this." Her lord was angry and killed Jia. So the wife was cast off by the concubine Yu's deceit, and the son died by it. Seen from this, even a father's love for his son can be harmed by slander. Ruler and minister keep company without the closeness of father and son, and the slandering words of the host of ministers are not one concubine's mouth alone. What wonder is it, then, that the worthy and the sagely are put to death! This is how Lord Shang was torn apart by chariots in Qin and Wu Qi was pulled limb from limb in Chu. Ministers as a rule do not wish to be cut down when they have a crime, and all wish to be honored and made known when they have no merit. But when the sage governs a state, reward is not added to the man without merit, and cutting down is surely carried out on the man with a crime. This being so, a man who holds art and method is by nature what the treacherous ministers at the ruler's side will harm, and none but an enlightened ruler can give him a hearing.
世之學者說人主,不曰「乘威嚴之勢以困姦衺之臣」,而皆曰「仁義惠愛而已矣」。世主美仁義之名而不察其實,是以大者國亡身死,小者地削主卑。何以明之?夫施與貧困者,此世之所謂仁義;哀憐百姓不忍誅罰者,此世之所謂惠愛也。夫有施與貧困,則無功者得賞;不忍誅罰,則暴亂者不止。國有無功得賞者,則民不外務當敵斬首,内不急力田疾作,皆欲行貨財事富貴,爲私善立名譽,以取尊官厚俸。故姦私之臣愈衆,而暴亂之徒愈勝,不亡何待?夫嚴刑者,民之所畏也;重罰者,民之所惡也。故聖人陳其所畏以禁其衺,設其所惡以防其姦,是以國安而暴亂不起。吾以是明仁義愛惠之不足用,而嚴刑重罰之可以治國也。無棰策之威,銜橛之備,雖造父不能以服馬;無䂓矩之法,䋲墨之端,雖王爾不能以成方圓;無威嚴之勢,賞罰之法,雖堯舜不能以爲治。
When the learned men of the age speak to a ruler, they do not say, "Ride the force of your authority and straiten your treacherous ministers." They all say, "Benevolence and righteousness, kindness and love, and nothing more." Rulers of the age admire the name of benevolence and righteousness and do not look into its substance, and so in the large case the state perishes and their own persons die, and in the small case their land is pared away and they themselves are brought low. How is this made clear? Giving to the poor and the hard-pressed is what the age calls benevolence and righteousness; pitying the people and not bringing oneself to cut down and punish is what the age calls kindness and love. Now if there is giving to the poor and hard-pressed, men without merit get rewards; and if a ruler cannot bring himself to cut down and punish, the violent and disorderly do not stop. When a state has men who are rewarded without merit, the people do not work abroad at facing the enemy and taking heads, nor press hard at home to plow and toil. They all want to spend goods and money to serve the wealthy and noble, to do private favors and set up a fine name, and so gain high office and a rich salary. So treacherous and self-seeking ministers grow ever more numerous and the violent and disorderly crowd grows ever stronger. What is such a state waiting for, if not ruin? Stern punishments are what the people fear; heavy penalties are what the people hate. So the sage sets out what they fear in order to forbid their wickedness, and lays down what they hate in order to block their treachery. Thus the state is settled and violence and disorder do not arise. By this I make clear that benevolence and righteousness, love and kindness are not enough to use, and that stern punishments and heavy penalties can govern a state. Without the authority of whip and crop and the fittings of bit and bridle, even Zaofu could not master a horse. Without the rule of compass and square and the guiding line of the inked cord, even Wang Er could not make a square or a circle. Without the force of authority and the law of reward and punishment, even Yao and Shun could not bring about order.
今世主皆輕釋重罰嚴誅,行愛惠,而欲霸王之功,亦不可幾也。故善爲主者,明賞設利以勸之,使民以功賞而不以仁義賜,嚴刑重罰以禁之,使民以罪誅而不以愛惠免,是以無功者不望,而有罪者不幸矣。託於犀車良馬之上,則可以陸犯阪阻之患;乘舟之安,持檝之利,則可以永絶江河之難;操法術之數,行重罰嚴誅,則可以致霸王之功。治國之有法術賞罰,猶若陸行之有犀車良馬也,水行之有輕舟便檝也。乘之者遂得其成。伊尹得之,湯以王;管仲得之,齊以霸;商君得之,秦以強。此三人者,皆明於霸王之術,察於治強之數,而不以牽於世俗之言;適當世明主之意,則有直任布衣之士,立爲卿相之處;處位治國,則有尊主廣地之實:此之謂足貴之臣。湯得伊尹,以百里之地立爲天子;桓公得管仲,立爲五霸主,九合諸侯,一匡天下;孝公得商君,地以廣,兵以強。
Now the rulers of the age all lightly set aside heavy penalties and stern cutting down and practice love and kindness, and still they want the merit of a hegemon or a king. That too is hopeless. So the man who does well as a ruler makes rewards clear and lays out profit to urge the people on, letting them be rewarded for merit and not granted gifts for benevolence and righteousness; and with stern punishments and heavy penalties he forbids them, letting them be cut down for crimes and not let off for love and kindness. Thus the man without merit does not hope, and the man with a crime does not count on luck. Entrust yourself to a rhinoceros-hide chariot and good horses, and you may brave the troubles of slope and rough ground on land. Ride the safety of a boat and hold the advantage of oars, and you may cut clean through the hardships of the great rivers. Grasp the method of law and art and carry out heavy penalties and stern cutting down, and you may reach the merit of a hegemon or a king. Law, art, reward and punishment in the governing of a state are like a rhinoceros-hide chariot and good horses on a land road, or a light boat and handy oars on a water road. Those who ride them attain their end in the end. Yi Yin got them, and Tang became king. Guan Zhong got them, and Qi became hegemon. Lord Shang got them, and Qin became strong. These three men were all clear in the art of the hegemon and the king and understood the method of order and strength, and they were not dragged along by the words of custom. Meeting the mind of an enlightened ruler of their day, they were entrusted at once, men in hempen clothes, and set in the place of chief minister; and holding that place and governing the state, they had the substance of honoring their ruler and broadening his land. Such a one is called a minister worth prizing. Tang got Yi Yin and from a hundred li of land was set up as Son of Heaven. Duke Huan got Guan Zhong and was set up as head of the five hegemons, gathering the lords nine times and setting the world right at one stroke. Duke Xiao got Lord Shang, and his land was broadened and his soldiers made strong.
故有忠臣者,外無敵國之患,内無亂臣之憂,長安於天下,而名垂後世,所謂忠臣也。若夫豫讓爲智伯臣也,上不能說人主使之明法術度數之理以避禍難之患,下不能領御其衆以安其國。及襄子之殺智伯也,豫讓乃自黔劓,敗其形容,以爲智伯報襄子之仇。是雖有殘形殺身以爲人主之名,而實無益於智伯若秋毫之末。此吾之所下也,而世主以爲忠而高之。古有伯夷、叔齊者,武王讓以天下而弗受,二人餓死首陽之陵。若此臣,不畏重誅,不利重賞,不可以罰禁也,不可以賞使也,此之謂無益之臣也。吾所少而去也,而世主之所多而求也。
So when there is a loyal minister, there is no trouble from enemy states without and no worry from disorderly ministers within; the ruler is long at peace in the world and his name hangs down to later ages. This is what is called a loyal minister. As for Yu Rang, who was minister to Zhi Bo: above, he could not persuade his ruler to make clear the principle of law, art, measure and method and so avoid the trouble of calamity and hardship; below, he could not lead and hold his multitude and settle his state. When Viscount Xiang killed Zhi Bo, Yu Rang branded his own skin and cut off his nose, ruining his face, to avenge Zhi Bo upon Viscount Xiang. In this he had the name of maiming and killing himself for his ruler, but in substance it profited Zhi Bo not so much as the tip of an autumn hair. This is what I rank low, and rulers of the age take it for loyalty and hold it high. In antiquity there were Bo Yi and Shu Qi. King Wu offered them the world and they would not take it, and the two men starved to death on the hill of Shouyang. Ministers like these do not fear heavy cutting down and do not count heavy reward a profit; they cannot be forbidden by punishment and cannot be employed by reward. These are called ministers of no profit. They are what I make little of and cast aside, and what rulers of the age make much of and seek out.
諺曰:「厲憐王。」此不恭之言也。雖然,古無虚諺,不可不察也。此謂劫殺死亡之主言也。人主無法術以御其臣,雖長年而美材,大臣猶將得勢擅事主斷,而各爲其私急。而恐父兄豪傑之士,借人主之力,以禁誅於己也,故弑賢長而立幼弱,廢正的而立不義。故《春秋》記之曰:「楚王子圍將聘於鄭,未出境,聞王病而反。因入問病,以其冠纓絞王而殺之,遂自立也。齊崔杼其妻美,而莊公通之,數如崔氏之室。及公往,崔子之徒賈舉率崔子之徒而攻公,公入室,請與之分國,崔子不許;公請自刃於廟,崔子又不聽;公乃走,踰於北墻。賈舉射公,中其股,公墜,崔子之徒以戈斫公而死之,而立其弟景公。」近之所見:李兌之用趙也,餓主父百日而死;卓齒之用齊也,擢湣王之筋,懸之廟梁,宿昔而死。故厲雖癕腫疕瘍,上比於《春秋》,未至於絞頸射股也;下比於近世,未至饑死擢筋也。故劫殺死亡之君,此其心之憂懼,形之苦痛也,必甚於厲矣。由此觀之,雖「厲憐王」可也。
A proverb says, "The leper pities the king." This is an irreverent saying. Even so, from of old there is no empty proverb, and it must be looked into. It is said of rulers who were seized, killed, and destroyed. When a ruler has no law and art for handling his ministers, then even if he is advanced in years and fine in talent, the great ministers will still gain power, take affairs into their own hands, and seize the ruler's decisions, each pressing his own private ends. And since they fear that his fathers and elder brothers and the bold and able men may borrow the ruler's strength to forbid and cut them down, they kill the worthy and the elder and set up the young and weak, and cast out the rightful heir and set up one who has no claim. So the Chunqiu records it and says: "Prince Wei (圍) of Chu was going on a state visit to Zheng. Before he had passed the border he heard that the king was ill and turned back. He then went in to ask after the illness, strangled the king with the cord of his cap and killed him, and thereupon set himself up. In Qi, the wife of Cui Zhu was beautiful, and Duke Zhuang had illicit dealings with her and went often to the house of the Cui family. When the duke went there, Jia Ju, one of Cui Zhu's followers, led Cui Zhu's followers and attacked him. The duke went into a room and asked to divide the state with him, and Cui Zhu would not allow it; the duke asked to take his own life in the ancestral temple, and Cui Zhu again would not listen. The duke then fled and climbed the north wall. Jia Ju shot the duke and hit him in the thigh; the duke fell, and Cui Zhu's followers hacked him with halberds and killed him, and set up his younger brother, Duke Jing." Of what has been seen near at hand: when Li Dui held power in Zhao, he starved Zhufu for a hundred days until he died; when Zhuo Chi held power in Qi, he pulled out the sinews of King Min and hung him from a temple beam, and in a night he was dead. So a leper, though he has swellings and running sores, has not, measured against the Chunqiu above, come to being strangled by the neck and shot in the thigh; and measured against recent ages below, he has not come to starving to death and having his sinews pulled out. So a ruler who is seized, killed, and destroyed is sure to have worry and dread in his heart and pain and suffering in his body worse than the leper's. Seen from this, even "the leper pities the king" will do.
Interlinear notes 1
The base text has 厲, a foul disease; it is rendered in present-day words. — translator