The Five Vermin五蠹
上古之世,人民少而禽獸衆,人民不勝禽獸蟲蛇。有聖人作,搆木爲巢以避羣害,而民悅之,使王天下,號曰有巢氏。民食果蓏蜯蛤,腥臊惡臭而傷害腹胃,民多疾病。有聖人作,鑽燧取火以化腥臊,而民說之,使王天下,號之曰燧人氏。中古之世,天下大水,而鯀、禹決瀆。近古之世,桀、紂暴亂,而湯、武征伐。今有搆木鑽燧於夏后氏之世者,必爲鯀、禹笑矣;有決瀆於殷、周之世者,必爲湯、武笑矣。然則今有美堯、舜、湯、武、禹之道於當今之世者,必爲新聖笑矣。是以聖人不期脩古,不法常可,論世之事,因爲之備。宋人有耕田者,田中有株,兔走觸株,折頸而死,因釋其耒而守株,冀復得兔,兔不可復得,而身爲宋國笑。今欲以先王之政,治當世之民,皆守株之類也。
In the world of high antiquity the people were few and the birds and beasts were many, and the people could not overcome the birds and the beasts and the insects and the snakes. A sage arose who wove wood into nests so that they might avoid the many harms, and the people were glad at him and made him king over all under heaven and called him Youchao. The people ate fruits and mussels and clams, and the rank and foul smell hurt their bellies and their stomachs, and the people were often sick. A sage arose who bored the fire drill and took fire and cooked away what was rank and foul, and the people were glad at him and made him king over all under heaven and called him Suiren. In the world of middle antiquity there was a great flood under heaven, and Gun and Yu opened the channels. In the world of near antiquity Jie and Zhou were violent and disorderly, and Tang and King Wu struck them. Now if a man were to weave wood and bore the fire drill in the age of Xiahou, he would surely be laughed at by Gun and Yu; if a man were to open channels in the age of Yin and Zhou, he would surely be laughed at by Tang and King Wu. Then if there is a man today who calls the way of Yao and Shun and Tang and King Wu and Yu beautiful in the present age, he will surely be laughed at by the new sages. For this reason the sage does not look to cultivate what is old and does not model himself on what is always held right; he weighs the affairs of his age and makes his provision to match. Among the men of Song there was one who plowed a field, and in the field was a stump. A rabbit ran and struck the stump and broke its neck and died, and so he laid down his plow and kept watch on the stump, hoping to get a rabbit again. The rabbit could not be had again, and he himself became the laughingstock of Song. To wish to govern the people of the present age with the government of the former kings is all of a kind with keeping watch on the stump.
古者丈夫不耕,草木之實足食也;婦人不織,禽獸之皮足衣也。不事力而養足,人民少而財有餘,故民不爭。是以厚賞不行,重罰不用,而民自治。今人有五子不爲多,子又有五子,大父未死而有二十五孫。是以人民衆而貨財寡,事力勞而供養薄,故民爭,雖倍賞累罰而不免於亂。
In old times the man did not plow, for the fruits of grass and tree were enough to eat; the woman did not weave, for the skins of birds and beasts were enough to wear. They did not toil with their strength, and their keep was enough; the people were few and goods were more than enough, and so the people did not quarrel. For this reason thick rewards were not handed out and weighty punishments were not used, and the people were in order of themselves. Now a man with five sons is not thought to have many, and each son has five sons of his own, so that before the grandfather dies there are twenty-five grandsons. For this reason the people are many and goods are scarce, and men toil hard with their strength and their keep is thin, and so the people quarrel. Though rewards be doubled and punishments piled up, disorder is not escaped.
堯之王天下也,茅茨不翦,采椽不斵;糲粢之食,䔧藿之羹;冬日麑裘,夏日葛衣,雖監門之服養,不虧於此矣。禹之王天下也,身執耒臿以爲民先,股無胈,脛不生毛,雖臣虜之勞,不苦於此矣。以是言之,夫古之讓天子者,是去監門之養而離臣虜之勞也,古傳天下而不足多也。今之縣令,一日身死,子孫累世絜駕,故人重之。是以人之於讓也,輕辭古之天子,難去今之縣令者,薄厚之實異也。夫山居而谷汲者,膢臘而相遺以水;澤居苦水者,買庸而決竇。故饑歲之春,幼弟不饟;穰歲之秋,䟽客必食。非疏骨肉愛過客也,多少之實異也。是以古之易財,非仁也,財多也;今之爭奪,非鄙也,財寡也。輕辭天子,非高也,勢薄也;爭士槖,非下也,權重也。故聖人議多少、論薄厚爲之政。故罰薄不爲慈,誅嚴不爲戾,稱俗而行也。故事因於世,而備適於事。
When Yao was king over all under heaven, the thatch of his roof was not trimmed and the oak rafters were not shaped; he ate coarse grain and a broth of goosefoot and bean leaves; in winter he wore a fawnskin coat and in summer a coat of hemp cloth. Even the clothing and keep of a gatekeeper is no poorer than this. When Yu was king over all under heaven, he took plow and spade in his own hands and went before the people; there was no flesh on his thighs and no hair grew on his shins. Even the toil of a servant or a slave is no more bitter than this. Speaking from this, the men of old who yielded up the throne of the Son of Heaven were putting away the keep of a gatekeeper and leaving behind the toil of a servant, and to hand on all under heaven in old times is not enough to be thought much of. Now a district magistrate may die in a single morning, and his sons and grandsons ride in carriages for generations, and so men hold the office heavy. For this reason, in the matter of yielding, men step back lightly from the throne of the Son of Heaven of old but find it hard to give up the magistracy of today. The substance of thin and thick is different. A man who lives in the hills and draws water from the valley sends water as a gift at the sacrifices; a man who lives by the marsh and suffers from water hires a laborer to open a ditch. So in the spring of a hungry year a man does not feed even his little brother, and in the autumn of a full year he feeds even a distant guest. It is not that he holds his own flesh and blood far off and loves the passing guest; the substance of much and little is different. For this reason to think goods light in old times was not benevolence but plenty of goods, and to snatch and contend today is not meanness but scarcity of goods. To step back lightly from the throne of the Son of Heaven was not loftiness but thin power, and to fight over an office is not baseness but weighty power. Therefore the sage weighs much and little and discusses thin and thick, and makes his government from it. So a thin punishment is not called kindness and a stern execution is not called cruelty; he acts to fit the custom. So affairs follow the age, and provision is fitted to affairs.
Interlinear notes 1
The base text 爭士槖 is read differently by the old commentaries; here it is taken as contending for office. — translator
古者文王處豐、鎬之間,地方百里,行仁義而懷西戎,遂王天下。徐偃王處漢東,地方五百里,行仁義,割地而朝者三十有六國。荊文王恐其害己也,舉兵伐徐,遂滅之。故文王行仁義而王天下,偃王行仁義而喪其國,是仁義用於古不用於今也。故曰:世異則事異。當舜之時,有苗不服,禹將伐之。舜曰:「不可。上德不厚而行武,非道也。」乃修教三年,執干戚舞,有苗乃服。共工之戰,鐵銛短者及乎敵,鎧甲不堅者傷乎體。是干戚用於古不用於今也。故曰:事異則備變。上古競於道德,中世逐於智謀,當今爭於氣力。齊將攻魯,魯使子貢說之。齊人曰:「子言非不辯也,吾所欲者土地也,非斯言所謂也。」遂舉兵伐魯,去門十里以爲界。故偃王仁義而徐亡,子貢辯智而魯削。以是言之,夫仁義辯智,非所以持國也。去偃王之仁,息子貢之智,循徐、魯之力使敵萬乘,則齊、荊之欲不得行於二國矣。
In old times King Wen dwelt between Feng and Hao, and his land was a hundred li square; he practiced benevolence and righteousness and drew the Western Rong to him, and at last was king over all under heaven. King Yan of Xu dwelt east of the Han, and his land was five hundred li square; he practiced benevolence and righteousness, and the states that cut off land and came to his court were thirty-six. King Wen of Chu feared that he would do him harm, raised troops and struck Xu, and wiped it out. So King Wen practiced benevolence and righteousness and was king over all under heaven, and King Yan practiced benevolence and righteousness and lost his state. This is because benevolence and righteousness were used in old times and are not used today. Therefore it is said: when the age is different, affairs are different. In the time of Shun the Youmiao would not submit, and Yu was about to strike them. Shun said, "It cannot be done. To use arms when the virtue above is not thick is not the way." So he cultivated instruction for three years and danced holding shield and axe, and then the Youmiao submitted. In the war of Gong Gong the man whose iron spearhead was short was reached by the enemy, and the man whose armor was not firm was wounded in the body. This is because shield and axe were used in old times and are not used today. Therefore it is said: when affairs are different, provision changes. In high antiquity men strove in the way and in virtue; in the middle age they chased after wit and scheming; today they fight with breath and strength. Qi was about to attack Lu, and Lu sent Zi Gong to talk them out of it. The man of Qi said, "Your words are not without skill, but what I want is land, and it is not what these words speak of." At last he raised troops and struck Lu and made a boundary ten li from the city gate. So King Yan was benevolent and righteous and Xu perished; Zi Gong was skilled in speech and wise and Lu was cut away. Speaking from this, benevolence and righteousness and skill in speech and wisdom are not what holds a state. Had they put away King Yan's benevolence and stopped Zi Gong's wit, and followed the strength of Xu and of Lu to face a state of ten thousand chariots, then the wishes of Qi and of Chu would not have been carried out in those two states.
夫古今異俗,新故異備。如欲以寛緩之政,治急世之民,猶無轡策而御駻馬,此不知之患也。今儒、墨皆稱先王兼愛天下,則視民如父母。何以明其然也?曰:「司寇行刑,君爲之不舉樂;聞死刑之報,君爲流涕。」此所舉先王也。夫以君臣爲如父子則必治,推是言之,是無亂父子也。人之情性莫先於父母,皆見愛而未必治也,雖厚愛矣,奚遽不亂?今先王之愛民,不過父母之愛子,子未必不亂也,則民奚遽治哉?且夫以法行刑,而君爲之流涕,此以效仁,非以爲治也。夫垂泣不欲刑者,仁也;然而不可不刑者,法也。先王勝其法,不聽其泣,則仁之不可以爲治亦明矣。
Old times and today have different customs, and the new and the old have different provisions. To wish to govern the people of an urgent age with a loose and easy government is like driving a wild horse with no reins and no whip; this is the trouble of not knowing. Now the Confucians and the Mohists all say that the former kings loved all under heaven alike, so that they looked on the people as on a father and a mother. How do they make it clear that this was so? They say, "When the minister of justice carried out a punishment, the lord would have no music for it, and when he heard the report of a death sentence, the lord shed tears for it." These are the former kings they hold up. They say that if lord and minister are as father and son there will surely be order; and pushing this saying out, it means there are no disordered fathers and sons. In the feelings and the nature of man nothing comes before father and mother, and all are loved and yet are not surely in order. Though the love be thick, how does that keep them from disorder? Now the love of the former kings for the people did not go beyond the love of a father and a mother for a son, and a son is not surely free of disorder; how then will the people surely be in order? Moreover, to carry out punishment by the law and to shed tears for it is to show benevolence, not to make government. To let the tears fall and not wish to punish is benevolence; and yet not to be able to leave off punishing is law. The former kings let their law win and did not listen to their own weeping, and so it is plain enough that benevolence cannot be made into government.
且民者固服於勢,寡能懷於義。仲尼,天下聖人也,脩行明道以游海内,海内說其仁、美其義而爲服役者七十人。蓋貴仁者寡,能義者難也。故以天下之大,而爲服役者七十人,而仁義者一人。魯哀公,下主也,南面君國,境内之民莫敢不臣。民者固服於勢,勢誠易以服人,故仲尼反爲臣而哀公顧爲君。仲尼非懷其義,服其勢也。故以義則仲尼不服於哀公,乘勢則哀公臣仲尼。今學者之說人主也,不乘必勝之勢,而務行仁義則可以王,是求人主之必及仲尼,而以世之凡民皆如列徒,此必不得之數也。
Moreover the people submit to power of themselves, and few are drawn by righteousness. Zhongni was a sage of all under heaven. He cultivated his conduct and made the way clear and traveled within the seas, and within the seas those who were glad at his benevolence and thought his righteousness beautiful and submitted to serve him were seventy men. For those who hold benevolence precious are few, and to be able in righteousness is hard. So in all the greatness of all under heaven those who submitted and served were seventy men, and the benevolent and righteous one was a single man. Duke Ai of Lu was a lowly ruler, yet he faced south and was lord of the state, and within his borders not one of the people dared not be his subject. The people submit to power of themselves, and power truly makes it easy to make men submit; so Zhongni turned out to be the subject and Duke Ai turned out to be the lord. Zhongni was not drawn by his righteousness; he submitted to his power. So by righteousness Zhongni would not submit to Duke Ai, but riding on power Duke Ai made Zhongni his subject. Now the learned men, speaking to the ruler of men, say that if he does not ride on the power that must win but works at practicing benevolence and righteousness, he can be king. This is to ask that the ruler of men must come up to Zhongni and that all the common people of the age be like his followers. It is a reckoning that surely cannot be had.
今有不才之子,父母怒之弗爲改,鄉人譙之弗爲動,師長教之弗爲變。夫以父母之愛、鄉人之行、師長之智,三美加焉,而終不動,其脛毛不改。州部之吏,操官兵,推公法,而求索姦人,然後恐懼,變其節,易其行矣。故父母之愛不足以教子,必待州部之嚴刑者,民固驕於愛、聽於威矣。故十仞之城,樓季弗能踰者,峭也;千仞之山,跛牂易牧者,夷也。故明王峭其法而嚴其刑也。布帛尋常,庸人不釋;鑠金百溢,盜跖不掇。不必害則不釋尋常,必害手則不掇百溢,故明主必其誅也。是以賞莫如厚而信,使民利之;罰莫如重而必,使民畏之;法莫如一而固,使民知之。故主施賞不遷,行誅無赦,譽輔其賞,毁隨其罰,則賢、不肖俱盡其力矣。
Now here is a son without ability. His father and mother grow angry at him and he does not mend; the men of his village scold him and he does not stir; his teacher and elder instruct him and he does not change. The love of father and mother, the conduct of the villagers, the wisdom of teacher and elder, three fine things laid on him, and in the end he does not stir, and not a hair on his shin is changed. But when the clerks of the district take up the arms of the office and push the public law and search out the wicked, then he is afraid and alters his bearing and mends his conduct. So the love of father and mother is not enough to teach a son, and the stern punishment of the district must be waited for. The people are proud against love of themselves and obedient to awe. A wall ten ren high Lou Ji cannot get over, because it is sheer; on a hill a thousand ren high a lame ewe is easily pastured, because it is level. So the enlightened king makes his law sheer and his punishments stern. Eight feet of cloth and silk the common man will not let go; a hundred yi of molten gold Robber Zhi will not pick up. Where there is no sure harm he will not let go the eight feet; where the hand is surely harmed he will not pick up the hundred yi. So the enlightened ruler makes his executions sure. For this reason there is nothing like making rewards thick and trustworthy, so that the people think them a gain; nothing like making punishments weighty and sure, so that the people fear them; nothing like making the law one and firm, so that the people know it. So when the ruler hands out rewards and does not shift them, carries out executions and grants no pardon, when praise seconds his rewards and blame follows his punishments, then the worthy and the unworthy alike spend all their strength.
今則不然,以其有功也爵之,而卑其士官也;以其耕作也賞之,而少其家業也;以其不收也外之,而高其輕世也;以其犯禁也罪之,而多其有勇也。毁譽、賞罰之所加者,相與悖繆也,故法禁壞而民愈亂。今兄弟被侵,必攻者,廉也;知友被辱,隨仇者,貞也。廉貞之行成,而君上之法犯矣。人主尊貞廉之行,而忘犯禁之罪,故民程於勇,而吏不能勝也。不事力而衣食,則謂之能;不戰功而尊,則謂之賢。賢能之行成,而兵弱而地荒矣。人主說賢能之行,而忘兵弱地荒之禍,則私行立而公利滅矣。
Now it is not so. They give a man rank because he has merit, and yet they hold his holding of office low; they reward him because he plows and works, and yet they make little of his household trade; they push him away because he will not be taken into service, and yet they call his slighting of the world lofty; they punish him because he breaks a prohibition, and yet they think much of his having courage. What blame and praise, reward and punishment are laid on runs contrary to itself, and so law and prohibition break down and the people grow more disorderly. Now when a brother is set upon, to strike without fail is called integrity; when a friend one knows is shamed, to go after the enemy is called uprightness. When the conduct of integrity and uprightness is made, the law of the lord above is broken. The ruler of men honors upright and honest conduct and forgets the crime of breaking prohibitions, and so the people vie in courage and the clerks cannot hold them down. He who is clothed and fed without toiling with his strength is called able; he who is honored without merit in battle is called worthy. When the conduct of the worthy and the able is made, the soldiers grow weak and the land runs wild. When the ruler of men is glad at the conduct of the worthy and the able and forgets the ruin of weak soldiers and wild land, then private conduct stands up and the public gain is destroyed.
儒以文亂法,俠以武犯禁,而人主兼禮之,此所以亂也。夫離法者罪,而諸先生以文學取;犯禁者誅,而羣俠以私劒養。故法之所非,君之所取;吏之所誅,上之所養也。法、趣、上、下,四相反也,而無所定,雖有十黄帝不能治也。故行仁義者非所譽,譽之則害功;文學者非所用,用之則亂法。楚之有直躬,其父竊羊,而謁之吏。令尹曰:「殺之!」以爲直於君而曲於父,報而罪之。以是觀之,夫君之直臣,父之暴子也。魯人從君戰,三戰三北。仲尼問其故,對曰:「吾有老父,身死莫之養也。」仲尼以爲孝,舉而上之。以是觀之,夫父之孝子,君之背臣也。故令尹誅而楚姦不上聞,仲尼賞而魯民易降北。上下之利,若是其異也,而人主兼舉匹夫之行,而求致社稷之福,必不幾矣。
The Confucians with their letters throw the law into disorder, and the knights with their arms break prohibitions, and the ruler of men gives honor to both. This is why there is disorder. He who departs from the law is guilty, and yet the various masters are taken up for their letters; he who breaks a prohibition is put to death, and yet the crowd of knights are kept for their private swords. So what the law condemns the lord takes up, and what the clerks put to death the one above keeps. Law and aim, above and below, these four run against each other and nothing is settled; though there were ten Yellow Emperors, they could not bring order. So those who practice benevolence and righteousness are not to be praised; praise them and merit is harmed. Those with letters are not to be used; use them and the law falls into disorder. In Chu there was a man called Zhi Gong. His father stole a sheep, and he reported it to the clerk. The prime minister of Chu said, "Kill him." He held that the man was upright toward his lord and crooked toward his father, and had him seized and punished. Looking at it this way, the upright subject of the lord is the harsh son of the father. A man of Lu followed his lord to war, and three times he fought and three times he ran. Zhongni asked him the reason, and he answered, "I have an old father, and if I die there is no one to keep him." Zhongni thought this filial and raised him up. Looking at it this way, the filial son of the father is the subject who turns his back on the lord. So when the prime minister put a man to death, the wickedness of Chu was no longer heard of above; when Zhongni gave a reward, the people of Lu surrendered and ran away easily. The gains of above and below are as different as this, and the ruler of men holds up the conduct of the common man and looks to bring the blessing of the altars of the state. It surely cannot be hoped for.
古者蒼頡之作書也,自環者謂之私,背私謂之公,公私之相背也,乃蒼頡固以知之矣。今以爲同利者,不察之患也。然則爲匹夫計者,莫如修行義而習文學。行義修則見信,見信則受事;文學習則爲明師,爲明師則顯榮,此匹夫之美也。然則無功而受事,無爵而顯榮,爲有政如此,則國必亂、主必危矣。故不相容之事,不兩立也。斬敵者受賞,而高慈惠之行;拔城者受爵祿,而信廉愛之說;堅甲厲兵以備難,而美薦紳之飾;富國以農,距敵恃卒,而貴文學之士;廢敬上畏法之民,而養遊俠私劒之屬。舉行如此,治强不可得也。國平養儒俠,難至用介士,所利非所用,所用非所利。是故服事者簡其業,而游學者日衆,是世之所以亂也。
In old times, when Cang Jie made the writing, he called what circles around itself private, si (私), and what turns its back on the private public, gong (公). That public and private turn their backs on each other Cang Jie already knew. To think today that their gains are the same is the trouble of not looking closely. Then for the man who reckons for a commoner there is nothing like cultivating conduct and righteousness and practicing letters. When conduct and righteousness are cultivated he is trusted, and being trusted he is given affairs; when letters are practiced he becomes an enlightened teacher, and becoming an enlightened teacher he is shown honor. This is the fine thing for a commoner. But then affairs are given without merit and honor is shown without rank, and if the government is like this the state must fall into disorder and the ruler must be in danger. So things that do not hold each other cannot stand together. The man who cuts down an enemy receives a reward, and yet kindly and generous conduct is held high; the man who takes a city receives rank and salary, and yet the talk of integrity and love is trusted; armor is made firm and weapons are sharpened against trouble, and yet the finery of the sash and the tablet is thought beautiful; the state is made rich by farming and the enemy is kept off by soldiers, and yet the knights of letters and learning are held precious; the people who respect the one above and fear the law are cast aside, and the wandering knights and the men of the private sword are kept. When the conduct of a state is like this, order and strength cannot be had. When the state is at peace it feeds Confucians and swordsmen; when trouble comes it uses armored soldiers. Those it favors are not those it uses, and those it uses are not those it favors. For this reason those who serve in their tasks slight their work, and those who wander and learn grow more numerous by the day. This is why the age is in disorder.
且世之所謂賢者,貞信之行也;所謂智者,微妙之言也。微妙之言,上智之所難知也。今爲衆人法,而以上智之所難知,則民無從識之矣。故糟糠不飽者不務粱肉,短褐不完者不待文繡。夫治世之事,急者不得,則緩者非所務也。今所治之政,民間之事,夫婦所明知者不用,而慕上知之論,則其於治反矣。故微妙之言,非民務也。若夫賢貞信之行者,必將貴不欺之士;不欺之士者,亦無不欺之術也。布衣相與交,無富厚以相利,無威勢以相懼也,故求不欺之士。今人主處制人之勢,有一國之厚,重賞嚴誅,得操其柄,以修明術之所燭,雖有田常、子罕之臣,不敢欺也,奚待於不欺之士?今貞信之士不盈於十,而境内之官以百數,必任貞信之士,則人不足官;人不足官,則治者寡而亂者衆矣。故明主之道,一法而不求智,固術而不慕信,故法不敗,而羣官無姦詐矣。
Moreover what the age calls worth is upright and trustworthy conduct, and what it calls wisdom is subtle and fine words. Subtle and fine words are hard even for the highest wisdom to know. To make laws for the multitude now out of what the highest wisdom finds hard to know is to leave the people no way to know them. So a man who cannot fill himself with dregs and bran does not work for fine grain and meat, and a man whose short hemp coat is not whole does not wait for figured embroidery. In the business of governing an age, if the urgent thing is not had, then the slow thing is not what should be worked at. Now if in the government he rules with and in the affairs among the people what husband and wife plainly know is not used, and the reasonings of the highest wisdom are longed for, that is the reverse of governing. So subtle and fine words are not the people's business. As for the man who calls upright and trustworthy conduct worthy, he will surely hold precious the officer who does not deceive; but the officer who does not deceive has no technique for keeping others from deceiving. When men in plain cloth deal with each other, they have no wealth and thickness to gain each other with and no awe and power to frighten each other with, and so they seek the officer who does not deceive. Now the ruler of men sits in the power that controls others and holds the thickness of a whole state; he can grasp the handles of weighty reward and stern execution, and if he cultivates what the enlightened technique lights up, then though he had ministers like Tian Chang and Zi Han they would not dare deceive him. Why should he wait for the officer who does not deceive? Now upright and trustworthy officers do not come to ten, and the offices within his borders are counted by the hundred. If he must give them to upright and trustworthy officers, there are not men enough for the offices; and when there are not men enough for the offices, those who bring order are few and those who bring disorder are many. So the way of the enlightened ruler is to make the law one and not seek wisdom, to make his technique firm and not long for trustworthiness; and so the law does not fail and the crowd of officials are without wickedness and deceit.
今人主之於言也,說其辯而不求其當焉;其用於行也,美其聲而不責其功。是以天下之衆,其談言者務爲辨而不周於用,故舉先王言仁義者盈廷,而政不免於亂;行身者競於爲高而不合於功,故智士退處巖穴,歸祿不受,而兵不免於弱。兵不免於弱,政不免於亂,此其故何也?民之所譽,上之所禮,亂國之術也。今境内之民皆言治,藏商、管之法者家有之,而國愈貧,言耕者衆,執耒者寡也;境内皆言兵,藏孫、吳之書者家有之,而兵愈弱,言戰者多,被甲者少也。故明主用其力,不聽其言;賞其功,必禁無用。故民盡死力以從其上。夫耕之用力也勞,而民爲之者,曰可得以富也。戰之爲事也危,而民爲之者,曰可得以貴也。今修文學,習言談,則無耕之勞而有富之實,無戰之危而有貴之尊,則人孰不爲也?是以百人事智而一人用力。事智者衆則法敗,用力者寡則國貧,此世之所以亂也。
Now the ruler of men, in the matter of words, is glad at their skill and does not look for their fitness; in putting them to use in action, he thinks their sound beautiful and does not hold them to their merit. For this reason, among the multitude of all under heaven, those who talk work at skill and do not go round to use, and so those who hold up the former kings and speak of benevolence and righteousness fill the court, and the government does not escape disorder. Those who conduct themselves vie at being lofty and do not match it with merit, and so wise officers withdraw to dwell in caves in the rock and hand back their salary and will not take it, and the soldiers do not escape weakness. The soldiers do not escape weakness and the government does not escape disorder. What is the reason for this? What the people praise and what the one above honors is the technique of a disordered state. Now all the people within the borders speak of government, and those who keep the laws of Shang Yang and Guan Zhong are in every house, and yet the state grows poorer, because those who speak of plowing are many and those who take hold of the plow are few. Within the borders all speak of soldiering, and those who keep the books of Sun Wu and Wu Qi are in every house, and yet the soldiers grow weaker, because those who speak of war are many and those who put on armor are few. So the enlightened ruler uses their strength and does not listen to their words; he rewards their merit and surely forbids what is of no use. So the people spend their dying strength in following the one above. Plowing is toilsome in its use of strength, and yet the people do it, saying that by it they may grow rich. War is a dangerous business, and yet the people do it, saying that by it they may grow honored. Now if by cultivating letters and practicing talk a man may have the substance of wealth without the toil of plowing and the honor of rank without the danger of war, who would not do it? For this reason a hundred men work at wisdom and one man uses his strength. When those who work at wisdom are many the law fails, and when those who use their strength are few the state is poor. This is why the age is in disorder.
故明主之國,無書簡之文,以法爲教;無先王之語,以吏爲師;無私劒之捍,以斬首爲勇。是境内之民,其言談者必軌於法,動作者歸之於功,爲勇者盡之於軍。是故無事則國富,有事則兵强,此之謂王資。既畜王資而承敵國之舋,超五帝、侔三王者,必此法也。
So in the state of an enlightened ruler there is no writing on bamboo slips, and the law is the teaching; there are no words of the former kings, and the clerks are the teachers; there is no fierceness of the private sword, and cutting off heads is courage. Then among the people within his borders those who talk keep to the track of the law, those who act turn to merit, and those who are brave give themselves wholly in the army. For this reason, when there is no business the state is rich, and when there is business the soldiers are strong. This is called the stuff of a king. Having stored up the stuff of a king and taken the crack in an enemy state, to pass the Five Emperors and stand level with the Three Kings, it is surely by this law.
今則不然,士民縱恣於内,言談者爲勢於外,外内稱惡,以待强敵,不亦殆乎!故羣臣之言外事者,非有分於從衡之黨,則有仇讎之忠,而借力於國也。從者,合衆弱以攻一强也;而衡者,事一强以攻衆弱也,皆非所以持國也。今人臣之言衡者,皆曰:「不事大,則遇敵受禍矣。」事大未必有實,則舉圖而委,效璽而請兵矣。獻圖則地削,效璽則名卑,地削則國削,名卑則政亂矣。事大爲衡,未見其利也,而亡地亂政矣。人臣之言從者,皆曰:「不救小而伐大,則失天下,失天下則國危,國危而主卑。」救小未必有實,則起兵而敵大矣。救小未必能存,而伐大未必不有䟽,有䟽則爲强國制矣。出兵則軍敗,退守則城拔。救小爲從,未見其利,而亡地敗軍矣。是故事强,則以外權士官於内;救小,則以内重求利於外。國利未立,封土厚祿至矣;主上雖卑,人臣尊矣;國地雖削,私家富矣。事成則以權長重,事敗則以富退處。人主之聽說於其臣,事未成則爵祿已尊矣,事敗而弗誅,則游說之士孰不爲用矰繳之說而徼倖其後?故破國亡主以聽言談者之浮說。此其故何也?是人君不明乎公私之利,不察當否之言,而誅罰不必其後也。皆曰:「外事,大可以王,小可以安。」夫王者,能攻人者也,而安則不可攻也。强則能攻人者也,治則不可攻也。治强不可責於外,内政之有也。今不行法術於内,而事智於外,則不至於治强矣。
Now it is not so. The officers and the people are unbridled within, and those who talk make power outside; inside and outside are alike bad, and with this they face a strong enemy. Is it not perilous? So among the crowd of ministers those who speak of outside affairs either have a share in the parties of the Vertical and the Horizontal alliances, or have a grudge to pay and borrow the strength of the state for it. The north-south alliance joins many weak states to attack one strong one, and the Horizontal alliance serves one strong state to attack many weak ones. Neither is the way to hold a state. Now those ministers who speak for the Horizontal alliance all say, "If we do not serve the great, we shall meet the enemy and take the harm." Serving the great does not surely have substance in it, and yet they hold up the maps and hand them over and give up the seal and ask for troops. Offer the maps and the land is cut away; give up the seal and the name is lowered. When the land is cut away the state is cut away, and when the name is lowered the government is in disorder. Serving the great for the Horizontal alliance, they have not seen its gain and have already lost land and thrown the government into disorder. Those ministers who speak for the Vertical alliance all say, "If we do not save the small and strike the great, we lose all under heaven; lose all under heaven and the state is in danger; and when the state is in danger the ruler is lowered." Saving the small does not surely have substance in it, and yet they raise troops and face the great. Saving the small cannot surely keep it standing, and striking the great cannot surely be without a gap, and where there is a gap they are controlled by the strong state. Send out troops and the army is beaten; draw back and hold and the walls are taken. Saving the small for the Vertical alliance, they have not seen its gain and have already lost land and had their army beaten. For this reason, serving the strong, they use power from outside to hold office within; saving the small, they use weight within to seek gain outside. Before the gain of the state stands up, fiefs of land and thick salaries have come; though the ruler above is lowered, the minister is honored; though the land of the state is cut away, the private house is rich. If the business succeeds, they use their power to make their weight last; if the business fails, they take their riches and withdraw to live at ease. When the ruler of men listens to his ministers' talk, their rank and salary are already high before the business succeeds, and when the business fails they are not put to death. Then among the officers who wander and talk, who would not use words like a stringed arrow and trust to luck for what comes after? So states are broken and rulers are lost by listening to the floating talk of those who speak. What is the reason for this? It is that the lord of men is not clear about public and private gain, does not look closely at whether words are fitting, and does not make punishment sure afterward. They all say, "Do well with outside affairs, and at most you become king, at least you are safe." Now a king is one who can attack others, and to be safe is not to be open to attack. Being strong, one can attack others; being in order, one is not open to attack. Order and strength cannot be sought from outside; they lie in the government within. Now if a ruler does not practice law and technique within and works at wisdom outside, he will not come to order and strength.
鄙諺曰:「長袖善舞,多錢善賈。」此言多資之易爲工也。故治强易爲謀,弱亂難爲計。故用於秦者,十變而謀希失;用於燕者,一變而計希得。非用於秦者必智,用於燕者必愚也,盖治亂之資異也。故周去秦爲從,朞年而舉;衛離魏爲衡,半歳而亡。是周滅於從,衛亡於衡也。使周、衛緩其從衡之計,而嚴其境内之治,明其法禁,必其賞罰,盡其地力以多其積,致其民死以堅其城守,天下得其地則其利少,攻其國則其傷大,萬乘之國莫敢自頓於堅城之下,而使强敵裁其弊也,此必不亡之術也。舍必不亡之術而道必滅之事,治國者之過也。智困於外而政亂於内,則亡不可振也。
A common saying runs, "Long sleeves are good for dancing, much money is good for trade." This says that with much to work with it is easy to do well. So where there is order and strength it is easy to scheme, and where there is weakness and disorder it is hard to reckon. So those used in Qin change ten times and their schemes seldom go wrong, and those used in Yan change once and their reckoning seldom comes right. It is not that those used in Qin are surely wise and those used in Yan are surely foolish; it is that the stuff of order and disorder is different. So Zhou left Qin for the Vertical alliance, and within a year it was taken; Wey broke from Wei for the Horizontal alliance, and within half a year it was gone. Thus Zhou was destroyed by the Vertical alliance and Wey perished by the Horizontal alliance. Had Zhou and Wey slowed their reckoning over the two alliances and made the government within their borders stern, made their laws and prohibitions clear and their rewards and punishments sure, spent the strength of their land to make their stores many and brought their people to face death so as to make the holding of their walls firm, then all under heaven would have gained little by taking their land and been greatly hurt by attacking their states. No state of ten thousand chariots would have dared to wear itself out beneath firm walls and let a strong enemy cut away at its weariness. This is the technique by which a state surely does not perish. To put away the technique by which a state surely does not perish and to speak for what surely destroys it is the fault of the man who governs a state. When wisdom is hard pressed outside and the government is in disorder within, the ruin cannot be shaken off.
民之政計,皆就安利如辟危窮。今爲之攻戰,進則死於敵,退則死於誅,則危矣。弃私家之事而必汗馬之勞,家困而上弗論,則窮矣。窮危之所在也,民安得勿避?故事私門而完解舍,解舍完則遠戰,遠戰則安。行貨賂而襲當塗者則求得,求得則私安,私安則利之所在,安得勿就?是以公民少而私人衆矣。
The people's reckoning in their affairs is all to go toward safety and gain and to keep away from danger and want. Now if they are made to attack and fight, going forward they die at the enemy's hand and drawing back they die by execution; that is danger. They cast aside the business of their own house and must do the toil that sweats the horses, and their house is hard pressed while the one above takes no account of it; that is want. Where want and danger lie, how can the people not avoid them? So they serve the private houses and make their release from service whole, and when the release is whole they are far from war, and being far from war they are safe. They hand out goods and bribes and attach themselves to the men who hold the road, and then what they seek is had; when what they seek is had they are safe in private; and where they are safe in private, there the gain lies, so how can they not go toward it? For this reason the public people are few and the private men are many.
夫明王治國之政,使其商工游食之民少而名卑,以寡趣本務而趨末作。今世近習之請行,則官爵可買;官爵可買,則商工不卑也矣。姦財貨賈得用於市,則商人不少矣。聚斂倍農而致尊過耕戰之士,則耿介之士寡而商賈之民多矣。
Now the government by which an enlightened king rules a state makes his merchants and artisans and the people who wander and eat few and low in name, so that few turn toward the root work and fewer run to the branch trades. Now when the requests of those close and familiar in the age are carried out, office and rank can be bought; and when office and rank can be bought, merchants and artisans are not low. When wicked goods and trading can be used in the market, merchants are not few. When what is gathered in is double the farmer's and the honor reached goes past that of the knights who plow and fight, then firm and upright officers are few and the trading people are many.
是故亂國之俗,其學者,則稱先王之道以籍仁義,盛容服而飾辯說,以疑當世之法,而貳人主之心。其言談者,爲設詐稱,借於外力,以成其私,而遺社稷之利。其帶劒者,聚徒屬,立節操,以顯其名,而犯五官之禁。其患御者,積於私門,盡貨賂,而用重人之謁,退汗馬之勞。其商工之民,脩治苦窳之器,聚弗靡之財,蓄積待時,而侔農夫之利。此五者,邦之蠹也。人主不除此五蠧之民,不養耿介之士,則海内雖有破亡之國、削滅之朝,亦勿怪矣。
For this reason the customs of a disordered state are these. Its learned men call up the way of the former kings and lean on benevolence and righteousness; they make their looks and their robes grand and dress up their skilled talk, so as to cast doubt on the law of the present age and make the ruler's heart two. Its talkers set up lies and make false claims and borrow strength from outside to bring about their own private ends, and throw away the gain of the altars of the state. Its sword bearers gather bands of followers and set up a bearing of honor so as to make their names shine, and they break the prohibitions of the five offices. Its men who dread service pile up in the private houses and spend all their goods and bribes and use the pleading of ministers of heavy power, and so put off the toil that sweats the horses. Its merchants and artisans make coarse and bad vessels and gather up wasteful goods, and store them up and wait for the season, and take away the farmer's gain. These five are the moths of the state. If the ruler of men does not clear away these five moth-like kinds of people and does not keep firm and upright officers, then though within the seas there be broken and ruined states and courts cut away and wiped out, it is nothing to wonder at.