Yetgeul › Zhuangzi (The Book of Master Zhuang) › Inner Chapters

On Making All Things Equal莊子 內篇 齊物論

Zhuangzi (The Book of Master Zhuang) 莊子 · Zhuang Zhou and later hands · Warring States period (4th–3rd century BC) · Guo Xiang's thirty-three-chapter recension · 12 passages · 3,182 Chinese characters · reading time 12.7 min

Zhuangzi (The Book of Master Zhuang) Inner Chapters "In the dark sea of the north there is a fish, and its name is Kun" — the book opens with this one line, and with a bird whose back is so wide that no one knows how many thousand li it measures setting out for the southern sea. He dreams he is a butterfly and wakes to ask whether he dreamed the butterfly or the butterfly is dreaming him; a butcher cuts up oxen for nineteen years without ever whetting his blade; when his wife dies he drums on a tub and sings. He stops a war with the tale of two kingdoms fighting on the horns of a snail until tens of thousands of dead lay fallen, and passing the grave of Huizi he says that he has no one left to talk with. Set beside the Daodejing, it can be heard speaking of the same ground in a very different voice.

1The pipes of earth and the pipes of heaven — I have lost myself

南郭子綦隱几而坐,仰天而嘘,嗒焉似喪其耦。顏成子游立侍乎前,曰:「何居乎?形固可使如槁木,而心固可使如死灰乎?今之隱几者,非昔之隱几者也。」子綦曰:「偃,不亦善乎,而問之也!今者吾喪我,汝知之乎?汝聞人籟而未聞地籟,汝聞地籟而未聞天籟夫!」子游曰:「敢問其方。」子綦曰:「夫大塊噫氣,其名爲風。是唯无作,作則萬竅怒呺。而獨不聞之翏翏乎?山林之畏隹,大木百圍之竅穴,似鼻,似口,似耳,似枅,似圈,似臼,似洼者,似汙者;激者,謞者,叱者,吸者,叫者,譹者,宎者,咬者,前者唱于而隨者唱喁,泠風則小和,飄風則大和,厲風濟則衆竅爲虚。而獨不見之調調、之刁刁乎?」子游曰:「地籟則衆竅是已,人籟則比竹是已。敢問天籟。」子綦曰:「夫吹萬不同,而使其自己也。咸其自取,怒者其誰邪!」

Nanguo Ziqi sat leaning on his armrest, and he looked up at the sky and breathed out, and he was blank, as though he had lost his own mate. Yancheng Ziyou stood in attendance before him and said, "What has happened? Can the body truly be made like withered wood, and can the mind truly be made like dead ashes? The man leaning on the armrest now is not the man who leaned on the armrest before."

Ziqi said, "Yan, you do well to ask it. Just now I lost myself. Do you know it? You have heard the pipes of man but not the pipes of earth. You have heard the pipes of earth but not the pipes of heaven."

Ziyou said, "May I ask the way of it."

Ziqi said, "The great clod belches out its breath, and the name of it is wind. So long as it does not rise, nothing happens, but when it rises, then the ten thousand hollows roar in anger. Have you not heard that long drawn moaning?

The hills and forests stand steep, and the hollows of a great tree a hundred spans around are like a nose, like a mouth, like an ear, like a bracket, like a cup, like a mortar, like a puddle, like a pool. They make the sound of water dashing, the sound of whistling, the sound of scolding, the sound of drawing breath in, the sound of shouting, the sound of sobbing, a deep sound, a gnawing sound. The one in front calls out yu and the one behind answers yu. In a light breeze they answer one another softly, and in a whirlwind they answer loudly, and when the fierce wind passes the ten thousand hollows are empty. Have you not seen the branches still swaying and trembling?"

Ziyou said, "The pipes of earth, then, are these ten thousand hollows, and the pipes of man are the bamboos set in a row. May I ask about the pipes of heaven."

Ziqi said, "It blows in ten thousand ways, and it lets each one be so of itself. All of them take it up of themselves, so who is it that rouses them?"

2Is there a true master

大知閑閑,小知間間;大言炎炎,小言詹詹。其寐也魂交,其覺也形開,與接爲構,日以心鬬。縵者,窖者,密者。小恐惴惴,大恐縵縵。其發若機栝,其司是非之謂也;其留如詛盟,其守勝之謂也;其殺如秋冬,以言其日消也;其溺之所爲之,不可使復之也;其厭也如緘,以言其老洫也。近死之心,莫使復陽也。喜怒哀樂,慮嘆變慹,姚佚啓態,樂出虚,蒸成菌。日夜相代乎前,而莫知其所萌。已乎,已乎!旦暮得此,其所由以生乎!非彼无我,非我无所取,是亦近矣,而不知其所爲使。若有真宰,而特不得其朕,可行已信,而不見其形,有情而无形。百骸、九竅、六藏,賅而存焉,吾誰與爲親?汝皆悅之乎?其有私焉?如是,皆有爲臣妾乎?其臣妾不足以相治乎?其遞相爲君臣乎?其有真君存焉。如求得其情與不得,无益損乎其真。一受其成形,不亡以待盡,與物相刃相靡,其行盡如馳,而莫之能止,不亦悲乎!終身役役而不見其成功,苶然疲役而不知其所歸,可不哀邪!人謂之不死,奚益!其形化,其心與之然,可不謂大哀乎?人之生也,固若是芒乎?其我獨芒,而人亦有不芒者乎?夫隨其成心而師之,誰獨且无師乎?奚必知代而心自取者有之?愚者與有焉。未成乎心而有是非,是今日適越而昔至也,是以无有爲有。无有爲有,雖有神禹,且不能知,吾獨且奈何哉!

Great knowledge is broad and easy, and small knowledge is picking and narrow. Great words are plain, and small words are chattering.

In sleep the spirits mingle, and on waking the body opens. What they touch they tangle with, and day after day they fight with the mind. There are the slack, the deep hidden, the close guarded. In small fear they tremble, and in great fear they lose themselves.

That they shoot out like the notch of a crossbow is said of the way they pick out right and wrong. That they hold back as though they had sworn an oath is said of the way they guard a victory. That they wither as in autumn and winter is said of the way they waste from day to day. What they have sunk into cannot be brought back. That they are stopped up as though sealed is said of the way they grow old and worn hollow. A mind close to death cannot be brought back to life by anything.

There is joy and anger, sorrow and delight, worry and lament, changeableness and dread, restlessness and license and affectation. As music comes out of the empty and as mushrooms rise out of the damp, so these alternate before us day and night, and no one knows where they sprout from.

Enough of it, enough of it. Morning and evening this is what is got, and is this what it is that they live by?

Without that there is no me, and without me there is nothing for it to be taken from. This too is close, and yet no one knows what it is that makes it so. There seems to be a true master, but no trace of it can be found. It works and is trusted, but its form is not seen. It has a substance and it has no form.

The hundred joints and the nine openings and the six organs are all there together, and which of them shall I be close to? Do you like them all, or do you favor one? If you favor one, then are they all made servants and concubines? Are servants and concubines unable to govern one another? Do they take turns being ruler and servant? Or is there a true ruler among them? Whether one searches out its substance and finds it or does not find it, nothing is added to its truth and nothing is taken away.

Once a man has received his finished form, he holds to it undestroyed and waits for the end. He cuts against things and is ground by them, and he runs his course as though galloping, and nothing can stop him. Is this not sad? He labors all his life and never sees the work finished. He is worn out and weary and does not know where he is going home to. Is this not pitiful? What good is it if people say he has not died? His form changes, and his mind goes with it. Shall this not be called a great sorrow?

Is a man's life truly as dark as this? Am I the only one who is in the dark, and are there others who are not?

If a man follows the mind he has already made and takes it for his teacher, then who is without a teacher? Why should only the one who knows the turning of things and takes it up in his own mind have such a teacher? The fool has one as well. To have right and wrong before the mind is finished is to say that one set out for Yue today and arrived yesterday. This is to take what is not there for something that is there. If what is not there is taken for something that is there, then even the spirit like Yu could not understand it, and what am I alone to do?

Interlinear notes 1

一作「薾」

苶 — some editions write it as 薾.

3That and this — the pivot of the Way

夫言非吹也,言者有言,其所言者特未定也。果有言邪?其未嘗有言邪?其以爲異於鷇音,亦有辯乎?其无辯乎?道惡乎隱而有真僞?言惡乎隱而有是非?道惡乎往而不存?言惡乎存而不可?道隱於小成,言隱於榮華。故有儒墨之是非,以是其所非而非其所是。欲是其所非而非其所是,則莫若以明。物无非彼,物无非是。自彼則不見,自知則知之。故曰:彼出於是,是亦因彼。彼、是,方生之說也。雖然,方生方死,方死方生;方可方不可,方不可方可;因是因非,因非因是。是以聖人不由,而照之于天,亦因是也。是亦彼也,彼亦是也。彼亦一是非,此亦一是非。果且有彼是乎哉?果且无彼是乎哉?彼是莫得其偶,謂之道樞。樞始得其環中,以應无窮。是亦一无窮,非亦一无窮也。故曰「莫若以明」。

Words are not the blowing of wind. One who speaks has words. It is only that what the words say is not fixed. Are there words after all, or have there never yet been words? If one holds that words differ from the peeping of a newly hatched bird, is there a distinction, or is there none?

Where is the Way hidden, that true and false have come up? Where are words hidden, that right and wrong have come up? Where could the Way go and not be there? Where could words be and not be allowed? The Way is hidden by small achievements, and words are hidden by fine show. So there are the right and wrong of the Confucians and the Mohists, each calling right what the other calls wrong and calling wrong what the other calls right. If you would call right what the other calls wrong and call wrong what the other calls right, nothing is so good as to light it up with clarity.

There is nothing among things that is not that, and nothing that is not this. Seen from over there it is not seen, but known from oneself it is known. So it is said that that comes out of this, and this also follows from that. That and this are born together, so the saying goes.

Even so, being born it is at once dying, and dying it is at once born. Being allowed it is at once not allowed, and not being allowed it is at once allowed. Right follows from wrong and wrong follows from right. So the sage does not take that road, but holds it up against heaven. This too follows from what is so.

This is also that, and that is also this. That has one right and wrong, and this has one right and wrong. Are there after all a that and a this? Are there after all no that and no this? Where that and this no longer find their match is called the pivot of the Way. The pivot first finds the center of the ring, and with it it answers the endless. Right is one endless thing, and wrong is one endless thing. So it was said, "Nothing is so good as to light it up with clarity."

4Three in the morning — the Way runs through and makes one

以指喻指之非指,不若以非指喻指之非指也;以馬喻馬之非馬,不若以非馬喻馬之非馬也。天地一指也,萬物一馬也。可乎可,不可乎不可。道行之而成,物謂之而然。惡乎然?然於然。惡乎不然?不然於不然。物固有所然,物固有所可。无物不然,无物不可。故爲是舉莛與楹,厲與西施,恢恑憰怪,道通爲一。其分也,成也;其成也,毀也。凡物无成與毀,復通爲一。唯達者知通爲一,爲是不用而寓諸庸。庸也者,用也;用也者,通也;通也者,得也。適得而幾矣,因是已。已而不知其然,謂之道。勞神明爲一而不知其同也,謂之朝三。何謂朝三?曰:狙公賦芧,曰:「朝三而暮四。」衆狙皆怒。曰:「然則朝四而暮三。」衆狙皆悅。名實未虧而喜怒爲用,亦因是也。是以聖人和之以是非而休乎天均,是之謂兩行。

Using a finger to show that a finger is not a finger is not as good as using what is not a finger to show that a finger is not a finger. Using a horse to show that a horse is not a horse is not as good as using what is not a horse to show that a horse is not a horse. Heaven and earth are one finger, and the ten thousand things are one horse.

What is allowed is allowed, and what is not allowed is not allowed. A road is made by walking it, and a thing is so because it is called so. Why is it so? It is so because it is so. Why is it not so? It is not so because it is not so. Things have from the first that in which they are so, and they have from the first that in which they are allowed. There is no thing that is not so, and no thing that is not allowed.

So take up a slender stalk and a great pillar, a leper and Xishi, whatever is odd and strange, and the Way runs through them and makes them one. Their dividing is a making, and their making is a breaking. But things have neither making nor breaking, and they run through again into one. Only the one who has gone all the way knows that they run through into one. For this reason he does not use his own judgment but leaves things to their common use. Common use is usefulness, and usefulness is running through, and running through is getting there. Come to getting there and you are nearly done, and you have only followed what is so. To do this and not know that it is so is called the Way.

To wear out the spirit trying to make things one and not to know that they are the same is called three in the morning (朝三). What is three in the morning? The keeper of the monkeys was handing out acorns, and he said, "Three in the morning and four in the evening." The monkeys were all angry. He said, "Then four in the morning and three in the evening." The monkeys were all pleased. Neither the name nor the substance was marred, and yet anger and pleasure were put to work. This too follows from what is so.

So the sage brings right and wrong together and rests in the evenness of heaven. This is called walking both roads (兩行).

5Making and marring

古之人,其知有所至矣。惡乎至?有以爲未始有物者,至矣,盡矣,不可以加矣。其次以爲有物矣而未始有封也,其次以爲有封焉而未始有是非也。是非之彰也,道之所以虧也。道之所以虧,愛之所以成。果且有成與虧乎哉?果且无成與虧乎哉?有成與虧,故昭氏之鼓琴也;无成與虧,故昭氏之不鼓琴也。昭文之鼓琴也,師曠之枝策也,惠子之據梧也,三子之知幾乎,皆其盛者也,故載之末年。唯其好之也,以異於彼,其好之也,欲以明之彼。非所明而明之,故以堅白之昧終。而其子又以文之綸終,終身无成。若是而可謂成乎,雖我亦成也;若是而不可謂成乎,物與我无成也。是故滑疑之耀,聖人之所圖也。爲是不用而寓諸庸,此之謂以明。

The men of old had knowledge that reached somewhere. How far did it reach? There were those who held that things had never yet begun to be, and that is the utmost and the end of it, and nothing can be added. Next were those who held that things are, but that there had never yet begun to be borders. Next were those who held that there are borders, but that there had never yet begun to be right and wrong.

The showing forth of right and wrong is how the Way is marred. The marring of the Way is how partial love is made. Is there after all a making and a marring? Is there after all no making and no marring? That there is a making and a marring is Master Zhao playing the zither. That there is no making and no marring is Master Zhao not playing the zither.

Zhao Wen playing the zither, Shi Kuang leaning on his staff, Huizi resting against the paulownia — the knowledge of these three men nearly reached it, and all of them stood at the height of it, and so their names were set down to their last years. It was only that they wished to set apart what they loved, and having loved it they wished to make it clear to others. They tried to make clear what could not be made clear, and so they ended in the darkness of hard and white. Zhao Wen's son too ended with his father's loose thread, and all his life finished nothing.

If such a thing can be called finishing, then I too have finished something. If such a thing cannot be called finishing, then neither things nor I have finished anything. Therefore the flickering light that confuses is what the sage throws out. For this reason he does not use his own judgment but leaves things to their common use. This is called lighting it up with clarity.

Interlinear notes 1

聖人之所圖也

圖 — read here as 屛, to put aside. Taken as 謀, to plan for, it would mean the sage embraces it instead. ― translator

6Heaven and earth were born alongside me

今且有言於此,不知其與是類乎?其與是不類乎?類與不類,相與爲類,則與彼无以異矣。雖然,請嘗言之。有始也者,有未始有始也者,有未始有夫未始有始也者;有有也者,有无也者,有未始有无也者,有未始有夫未始有无也者。俄而有无矣,而未知有无之果孰有孰无也。今我則已有謂矣,而未知吾所謂之,其果有謂乎?其果无謂乎?天下莫大於秋豪之末,而太山爲小;莫壽乎殤子,而彭祖爲夭。天地與我並生,而萬物與我爲一。既已爲一矣,且得有言乎?既已謂之一矣,且得无言乎?一與言爲二,二與一爲三。自此以往,巧歷不能得,而況其凡乎!故自无適有,以至於三,而況自有適有乎!无適焉,因是已。

Suppose there are words here now. I do not know whether they are of a kind with what is right or not of a kind with it. Once of a kind and not of a kind are made a kind together, then there is nothing to tell them from that other. Even so, let me try to say it.

There is a beginning. There is a not yet having begun to be a beginning. There is a not yet having begun to be that not yet having begun to be a beginning. There is being. There is nothing. There is a not yet having begun to be nothing. There is a not yet having begun to be that not yet having begun to be nothing. All at once there was being and nothing, and yet one does not know, of being and nothing, which is there and which is not.

Now I have already said something, and yet I do not know whether what I said was after all a saying or after all not a saying.

Nothing in the world is larger than the tip of an autumn hair, and Mount Tai is small. No one has lived longer than a child that died in the cradle, and Pengzu died young. Heaven and earth were born alongside me, and the ten thousand things are one with me.

If they have already been made one, can there still be words? If they have already been called one, can there still be no words? The one and the saying make two, and the two and the one make three. Go on from here and a skilled reckoner could not get to the end of it, let alone an ordinary man. If going from nothing to being brings us to three, how much more going from being to being. Do not go on. Follow what is so, and that is all.

7The discernment that does not speak — the hidden light (葆光)

夫道未始有封,言未始有常,爲是而有畛也,請言其畛:有左、有右,有倫、有義,有分、有辯,有競、有爭,此之謂八德。六合之外,聖人存而不論;六合之內,聖人論而不議。《春秋》經世,先王之志,聖人議而不辯。故分也者,有不分也;辯也者,有不辯也。曰:何也?聖人懷之,衆人辯之以相示也,故曰:辯也者,有不見也。夫大道不稱,大辯不言,大仁不仁,大廉不嗛,大勇不忮。道昭而不道,言辯而不及,仁常而不成,廉清而不信,勇忮而不成,五者园而幾向方矣。故知止其所不知,至矣。孰知不言之辯,不道之道?若有能知,此之謂天府。注焉而不滿,酌焉而不竭,而不知其所由來,此之謂葆光。

The Way has never yet had borders, and words have never yet had constancy. For this reason lines were drawn, and let me speak of those lines. There is a left and there is a right. There is order and there is what is fitting. There is dividing and there is discerning. There is striving and there is contending. These are called the eight virtues.

What lies outside heaven and earth the sage leaves be and does not discuss. What lies within heaven and earth the sage discusses and does not argue over. The Chunqiu is the will of the former kings in governing the world, and the sage argues over it and does not discern within it.

So to divide is to leave something undivided, and to discern is to leave something undiscerned. How is this? The sage holds it within him, and the crowd discern and display it to one another. So it is said that to discern is to leave something unseen.

The great Way is not named. The great discerning does not speak. The great benevolence is not benevolent. The great honesty is not humble. The great courage is not fierce. When the Way is shown forth it is not the Way. When words argue they do not reach. When benevolence is constant it is not made. When honesty is only clean it is not trusted. When courage is fierce it is not made. These five are round, and they come near to turning square.

So when knowledge stops at what it does not know, it is at its utmost. Who knows the discerning that does not speak, and the Way that is not called a Way? If there is one who can know it, this is called the storehouse of heaven. Pour into it and it does not fill, draw from it and it does not run dry, and no one knows where it comes from. This is called the hidden light (葆光).

8The three states Yao asked Shun about

故昔者堯問於舜曰:「我欲伐宗、膾、胥敖,南面而不釋然,其故何也?」舜曰:「夫三子者,猶存乎蓬艾之間。若不釋然,何哉?昔者十日並出,萬物皆照,而況德之進乎日者乎!」

Long ago Yao asked Shun, "I mean to strike Zong and Kuai and Xu'ao, and though I face south my mind is not at ease. What is the reason for it?"

Shun said, "Those three are still out among the mugwort and the weeds. What is there for you not to be at ease about? Long ago ten suns came out together and lit up the ten thousand things, and how much more does virtue that goes beyond the sun."

9Nieque asks Wang Ni — what is the right taste

齧缺問乎王倪曰:「子知物之所同是乎?」曰:「吾惡乎知之!」「子知子之所不知邪?」曰:「吾惡乎知之!」「然則物无知邪?」曰:「吾惡乎知之!雖然,嘗試言之。庸詎知吾所謂『知之』非不知邪?庸詎知吾所謂『不知』之非知邪?且吾嘗試問乎汝:民溼寢則腰疾偏死,鰌然乎哉?木處則惴慄恂懼,猨猴然乎哉?三者孰知正處?民食芻豢,麋鹿食薦,蝍蛆甘帶,鴟鴉耆鼠,四者孰知正味?猨猵狙以爲雌,麋與鹿交,鰌與魚游。毛嬙、麗姬,人之所美也,魚見之深入,鳥見之高飛,麋鹿見之決驟,四者孰知天下之正色哉?自我觀之,仁義之端,是非之塗,樊然殽亂,吾惡能知其辯!」齧缺曰:「子不知利害,則至人固不知利害乎?」王倪曰:「至人神矣!大澤焚而不能熱,河漢沍而不能寒,疾雷破山、風振海而不能驚。若然者,乘雲氣,騎日月,而遊乎四海之外。死生无變於己,而況利害之端乎!」

Nieque asked Wang Ni, "Do you know what all things alike hold to be right?"

"How would I know that?"

"Do you know what it is that you do not know?"

"How would I know that?"

"Then do things have no knowledge?"

"How would I know that? Still, let me try to say it. How do I know that what I call knowing is not in fact not knowing? How do I know that what I call not knowing is not in fact knowing?

Let me put a question to you. If a man sleeps in a damp place his back aches and half of him withers. Is it so for the loach? If he lives up a tree he shakes and is afraid. Is it so for the monkey? Of these three, which knows the right place to live?

Men eat the flesh of cattle and pigs, deer eat grass, centipedes find snakes sweet, owls and crows relish rats. Of these four, which knows the right taste?

Monkeys take monkeys for mates, elk go with deer, loaches swim with fish. Mao Qiang and Li Ji are what men call beautiful, but when fish see them they go deep down, when birds see them they fly high up, when deer see them they bolt away. Of these four, which knows the right beauty in the world?

As I see it, the beginnings of benevolence and rightness and the paths of right and wrong are tangled and confused, and how could I know how to discern among them?"

Nieque said, "If you do not know benefit from harm, then does the utmost man also not know benefit from harm?"

Wang Ni said, "The utmost man is a wonder. A great marsh may burn and it cannot make him hot. The Yellow River and the Han may freeze over and they cannot make him cold. A fierce thunderbolt may split the hills and the wind may shake the sea, and they cannot startle him. Such a man rides the breath of the clouds, mounts the sun and the moon, and roams beyond the four seas. Death and life make no change in him, and how much less the beginnings of benefit and harm."

10The words of Changwuzi — waking from the great dream

瞿鵲子問乎長梧子曰:「吾聞諸夫子,聖人不從事於務,不就利,不違害,不喜求,不緣道,无謂有謂,有謂无謂,而遊乎塵垢之外。夫子以爲孟浪之言,而我以爲妙道之行也。吾子以爲奚若?」長梧子曰:「是黃帝之所聽瑩也,而丘也何足以知之!且汝亦大早計,見卵而求時夜,見彈而求鴞炙。予嘗爲汝妄言之,汝以妄聽之。奚旁日月,挾宇宙,爲其䐇合,置其滑涽,以隸相尊?衆人役役,聖人愚芚,參萬歲而一成純。萬物盡然,而以是相藴。予惡乎知悅生之非惑邪?予惡乎知惡死之非弱喪而不知歸者邪?麗之姬,艾封人之子也。晉國之始得之也,涕泣沾襟;及其至於王所,與王同匡牀,食芻豢,而後悔其泣也。予惡乎知夫死者不悔其始之蘄生乎?夢飲酒者,旦而哭泣;夢哭泣者,旦而田獵。方其夢也,不知其夢也。夢之中又占其夢焉,覺而後知其夢也。且有大覺而後知此其大夢也,而愚者自以爲覺,竊竊然知之。君乎,牧乎,固哉!丘也與汝,皆夢也;予謂汝夢,亦夢也。是其言也,其名爲弔詭。萬世之後,而一遇大聖知其解者,是旦暮遇之也。既使我與若辯矣,若勝我,我不若勝,若果是也,我果非也邪?我勝若,若不吾勝,我果是也,而果非也邪?其或是也,其或非也邪?其俱是也,其俱非也邪?我與若不能相知也。則人固受其黮闇,吾誰使正之?使同乎若者正之,既與若同矣,惡能正之?使同乎我者正之,既同乎我矣,惡能正之?使異乎我與若者正之,既異乎我與若矣,惡能正之?使同乎我與若者正之,既同乎我與若矣,惡能正之?然則我與若與人,俱不能相知也,而待彼也邪?何謂和之以天倪?曰:是不是,然不然。是若果是也,則是之異乎不是也亦无辯;然若果然也,則然之異乎不然也亦无辯。化聲之相待,若其不相待。和之以天倪,因之以曼衍,所以窮年也。忘年忘義,振於无竟,故寓諸无竟。」

Ququezi asked Changwuzi, "I heard from the Master that the sage does not make affairs his business, does not go after benefit, does not shun harm, does not delight in seeking, and is not bound to the Way. He says nothing and yet has said it, and he says it and yet has said nothing, and he roams beyond the dust and the dirt. The Master called these reckless words, but I take them for the working of a wonderful Way. What do you think of them?"

Changwuzi said, "These are words that even the Yellow Emperor would have been puzzled to hear, so how could Qiu (丘) know them? And you have reckoned far too early. It is like seeing an egg and looking for it to call the dawn, or seeing a pellet and looking for roast bird.

Let me speak to you at random, and do you listen at random. Why not set the sun and the moon at your side and take the universe under your arm, and leave things to come together as they will, and let their muddle be, and hold one another in honor as servants do? The crowd toil and toil, and the sage is dull and simple. He takes ten thousand years together and makes of them one pure whole. The ten thousand things are all of them so, and by this they hold one another within.

How do I know that to delight in life is not a delusion? How do I know that to hate death is not like being lost from home as a child and not knowing the way back?

Li Ji was the daughter of the border warden of Ai. When the state of Jin first got her, her tears wet the front of her robe. But when she came to the ruler's place and shared his couch and ate the flesh of cattle and pigs, she was sorry that she had wept. How do I know that the dead do not repent of having once begged for life?

A man who drinks wine in a dream weeps in the morning. A man who weeps in a dream goes out hunting in the morning. While he is dreaming he does not know it is a dream. In the dream he may even divine his dream, and only when he wakes does he know it was a dream. And there is a great waking, after which one knows that this was a great dream. The fool thinks he is awake and knows it all in his small way. Ruler, herdsman, how stubborn it is. Qiu and you are both of us dreaming, and when I call you a dream I am dreaming too. Words like these are named diaogui (弔詭). If after ten thousand ages one great sage were met who knew the answer to them, it would be as though he had been met between morning and evening.

Suppose now that you and I argue. If you beat me and I do not beat you, are you after all right and am I after all wrong? If I beat you and you do not beat me, am I after all right and are you after all wrong? Is one of us right and one of us wrong? Are both of us right, or both of us wrong? If you and I cannot know it between us, then others will be in that same darkness, and whom shall I set to put it right?

If I set someone who agrees with you to put it right, he already agrees with you, so how can he put it right? If I set someone who agrees with me to put it right, he already agrees with me, so how can he put it right? If I set someone who differs from both you and me to put it right, he already differs from both of us, so how can he put it right? If I set someone who agrees with both you and me to put it right, he already agrees with both of us, so how can he put it right? Then you and I and the others cannot know it between us, and whom are we waiting for?

What is it to bring things together with the evenness of heaven? Right is not right, and so is not so. If right were after all right, then there would be nothing to discern in its differing from not right. If so were after all so, then there would be nothing to discern in its differing from not so. Changing voices wait upon one another as though they did not wait upon one another. Bring them together with the evenness of heaven and let them follow the endless flow, and this is the way to live out one's years. Forget the years and forget what is fitting, and rouse yourself in the borderless, and so make your home in the borderless."

11The shadow of the shadow asks the shadow

罔兩問景曰:「曩子行,今子止;曩子坐,今子起,何其无特操與?」景曰:「吾有待而然者邪?吾所待又有待而然者邪?吾待蛇蚹蜩翼邪?惡識所以然?惡識所以不然?」

The shadow of the shadow asked the shadow, "A moment ago you were walking and now you have stopped. A moment ago you were sitting and now you have risen. How is it that you have no constancy of your own?"

The shadow said, "Is it that I have something I lean on, and so am like this? Is it that what I lean on has something it leans on in turn, and so is like this? Am I waiting on the scales of a snake or the wings of a cicada? How should I know why it is so, and how should I know why it is not so?"

12The butterfly dream

昔者莊周夢爲胡蝶,栩栩然胡蝶也,自喻適志與,不知周也。俄然覺,則蘧蘧然周也。不知周之夢爲胡蝶與?胡蝶之夢爲周與?周與胡蝶,則必有分矣,此之謂物化。

Long ago Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly. He was a butterfly fluttering about. He was pleased with himself and it suited his mind, and he did not know that he was Zhou. All at once he woke, and he was Zhou, stiff and solid.

Was it Zhou who dreamed he was a butterfly, or is it the butterfly who dreams he is Zhou? Between Zhou and the butterfly there must surely be a division. This is called the changing of things (物化).