Yetgeul › Dongguk Isangguk Jip (Collected Works of Minister Yi of the Eastern Country) › Former Collection, Book 21

On Repairing the House理屋說

Dongguk Isangguk Jip (Collected Works of Minister Yi of the Eastern Country) 東國李相國集 · Yi Gyubo · Compiled 1241 (Goryeo, 28th year of King Gojong); revised and enlarged 1251 · 1 passages · 185 Chinese characters · reading time 1.7 min

Dongguk Isangguk Jip (Collected Works of Minister Yi of the Eastern Country) Former Collection, Book 21 The collected writings of Yi Gyubo of Goryeo, gathered and cut in woodblock by his son Yi Ham in 1241 and revised and enlarged by his grandson Yi Ikbae in 1251. It holds poems and rhapsodies, memorials and reports sent up to the king, records written for temples and pagodas, stele and tomb inscriptions, letters and prefaces, and the state letters that passed to and from the Mongols during the invasions. The Lay of King Dongmyeong, which sings the founder of Goguryeo, stands in volume 3 of the first collection, and the daily life of a man who called himself the White Cloud Layman — with his wine, his zither and his verse — fills the later collection. The book closes with the last poem he wrote as his eyes failed and he laid down the brush, and with the dirge and tomb inscription others made for him after his death.

家有頹廡不堪支者凡三間。予不得已悉繕理之。先是。其二間爲霖雨所漏寢久。予知之。因循莫理。一間爲一雨所潤。亟令換瓦。及是繕理也。其漏寢久者。欀桷棟樑。皆腐朽不可用。故其費煩。其經一雨者。屋材皆完固可復用。故其費省。予於是謂之曰。其在人身。亦爾知非而不遽改。則其敗已不啻若木之朽腐不用。過勿憚改。則未害復爲善人。不啻若屋材可復用。非特此耳。國政亦如此。凡事有蠹民之甚者。姑息不革。而及民敗國危。而後急欲變更。則其於扶越也難哉。可不愼耶。

In my house there were in all three bays of a wing that had fallen in and could hardly be held up. Unwillingly I had them all seen to and repaired. Before this, two of those bays had long been leaking in the long rains. I knew it and yet put it off and did not repair them; one bay had been wetted by the rain once, and I had its tiles changed at once.

When the work of repair was done this time, I saw that in those which had leaked long the rafters, the pillars and the beams were all rotted and could not be used, so that the cost of it was great; while in the one that had taken the rain once the timbers of the house were all whole and firm and could be used again, so that the cost of it was small.

Upon this I say: with a man's own person it is so as well. To know that a thing is wrong and yet not mend it quickly — the ruin of it is no different from timber rotted past use; and not to shrink from mending one's faults does no harm to becoming a good man again, which is no different from timbers that can be used again. Nor is it this alone: the government of a state is like this too. When among affairs there are those that gnaw at the people grievously, and they are let pass in a makeshift way and not mended, and only after the people are ruined and the state imperilled does one try to mend them in haste — will it not be hard then to prop things up and get through? How can one fail to take care?