Yetgeul › Gyewon Pilgyeongjip (A Plowing of the Brush in the Cassia Garden) › Book 11 — Letters

A letter to Minister of Works Zhou Bao of Zhexi浙西周寶司空書

Gyewon Pilgyeongjip (A Plowing of the Brush in the Cassia Garden) 桂苑筆耕集 · Choe Chiwon · 886 (Tang, 6th year of the Zhonghe era · Silla, 12th year of King Heongang) · 1 passages · 675 Chinese characters · reading time 2.7 min

Gyewon Pilgyeongjip (A Plowing of the Brush in the Cassia Garden) Book 11 — Letters A collection Choe Chiwon made by choosing out of the writings of his four years in the headquarters of Gao Pian, military commissioner of Huainan under the Tang, binding them into twenty volumes and presenting them to King Heongang of Silla in 886. It holds 366 pieces — memorials and reports sent up to the emperor, the proclamation denouncing Huang Chao, letters to the several military commissioners, orders and dispatches issued to those under him, Daoist and Buddhist texts for services, funeral offerings, records written for the outer wall of Chengdu and for a painting of Annam, and the reports and poems he sent up to Gao Pian. Here is the first report, which begins "I am a man of Silla," and the proclamation against Huang Chao with its line, "Not only do all the men of the world think to kill you openly; the ghosts under the earth have already discussed cutting you down in secret." The last volume holds the poems he made on the voyage home to the country he had left at twelve. It is the oldest collection by a Korean that survives, and when Hong Seokju and Seo Yugu printed it with movable type in 1834 they called it "the root and the beginning of the writing of our Eastern Country." Their two prefaces are translated with it.

1Taking him to task for receiving Huainan's rebel soldiers

昨奉公牒。云當道臨淮叛卒。過江來投。集衆廣場。已受降訖。三復來示。言難不酬。且降之爲名。其理甚大。虞舜之七旬苗格。晉侯之三日原歸。此皆以干紀亂常。起兵動衆。緩之則稔成患害。急之則橫致殺傷。遂假小慈。終施大信。能敷德化。俾革奸兇。若有偶聚萑苻。敢爲榛梗者。共須撲滅。勿使晏安。今相公幸此隣災。樂其軍禍。莫能嫉惡。翻欲惠奸。恐乖杖鉞之威。虛衒倒戈之捷。且如去年。陳儒徒伴。唐突貴鎭。封疆僅有六萬餘人。宣州日告危急。此時相公何不招諭。致令侵凌。却見瑣瑣頑兇。卽自勤勤誘引。莫測高旨。實辜衆心。傳不云乎。召□外盜。書不云乎。爲逋逃主。稍詳至理。無信虛詞。昔漢朝匈奴叛黨來附。景帝便欲與之封。周亞夫曰。彼背其主而見賞。何以責人臣之節。以小喩大。可量事情。況臨淮一郡。早從淝上行營。及淮邊戰敵。每有優賞。曾無偏頗。自是臨財則競起貪心。遇賊則皆無鬪志。旋爲逗撓。猶與矜寬。昨又請換都頭。已依衆請。殊不知犬易興於狂瘈。豕難制於喧豗。未盡誅擒。便謀奔竄。幸且未離近境。固合同塞奸源。在此旣已不忠。於彼亦應非利。石祁子所云。天下之惡一也。惡於宋而保於我。保之何補。其在玆乎。況凡隣府事宜。一彼一此。互相救援。同致安寧。是以。前年六月中。貴鎭有天平潞府元從兵士背叛奔逃。數僅百人。爲患非小。遂蒙移牒。請爲追擒。當使羌都將梁楚部領馬軍。所在討襲。並各帖管內諸州令差精兵。同力捕逐。尋卽諸鎭及東塘遊奕。使相次收獲三十八人。纔見擒來。便令押送。續得梁楚狀報。到濠州界。趁及殘孼。殺得三十餘人。其餘漏網之徒。盡以傷弓而走。所生擒之兇黨。皆就戮於貴藩。能致彼之快心。實賴此之勞力。今則却見臨淮叛卒。特向沿江招呼。便稱受降。仍詩補職。累牒咨請。不送過江。蒐慝何多。養奸斯甚。敢言以怨報德。實。恐在安忘危。詩云投我以木瓜。報之以瓊琚。匪報也。永以爲好。此乃國風遺訓。昭晣可觀。相公通仁。略賜詳度。無自賈天下之戮笑也。其他已具廻牒。伏惟俯賜照察。

Some time ago I received your official dispatch, which said, "The rebel soldiers of Linhuai of this circuit have crossed the river and come to surrender. They were gathered in a broad open place, and their surrender has already been accepted." I have gone over your letter three times, and it is hard not to answer what it says. Surrender, as a word, carries a very great principle. That the Miao came to Yu Shun in seventy days, and that Yuan came over to the Marquis of Jin in three days, were both cases where men had broken the bonds of order and thrown the constant way into confusion, raising troops and stirring up crowds. To go slow with them would let harm ripen; to press them hard would bring killing and wounding crosswise. So a small mercy was borrowed and a great good faith was shown in the end, that the transforming power of virtue might spread and the crafty and vile be made to change. But if there are men who happen to gather in the reeds and dare to be thorns in the road, they must be stamped out together; do not let them rest at ease. Now Your Excellency counts this neighbor's calamity good fortune and takes pleasure in the misfortune of its army. You cannot hate what is evil, and instead you would show kindness to the crafty. I fear this runs against the authority of one who holds the battle axe, and that you boast in vain of a victory of spears turned about. Take last year: the company of Chen Ru rushed rudely upon your garrison, and there were barely sixty thousand and more men on the borders while Xuanzhou reported danger day after day. Why did Your Excellency not call them and admonish them then, and so let them trespass and oppress? Yet on seeing a few petty stubborn villains you at once set yourself diligently to draw them in. I cannot fathom your high intent, and truly it betrays the hearts of the many. Does the Zuo zhuan not say, "□ calls in the bandits from outside"? Does the Book of Documents not say, "He becomes the master of runaways"? Consider the utmost principle a little more closely, and do not trust empty words. Long ago, when a rebel band of the Xiongnu came over to the Han court, Emperor Jing meant at once to grant them fiefs, and Zhou Yafu said, "If those who turn their backs on their own lord are rewarded, how will you hold a subject to his constancy?" Take the small to figure the great, and the state of things can be measured. Moreover the one commandery of Linhuai followed the marching camp on the Fei early on, and down to the fighting on the Huai border there were always generous rewards with never a partiality. From that time on, faced with goods they vied in greed, and meeting the bandits none of them had the will to fight. They soon fell to hanging back, and still they were treated with indulgence. Some time ago they asked again that their corps commander be changed, and their request was granted. It was not known at all that a dog readily turns rabid and a pig is hard to check once it squeals and struggles. Before they had all been cut down and taken, they were already plotting to run and hide. Fortunately they have not yet left the nearby border, and it is surely right to block the source of this crookedness together. Having been disloyal here, they must be of no profit there either. What Shi Qizi said, "The evil of the world is one. If a thing is hated in Song and sheltered by me, what good is the sheltering?" lies just here. Besides, in the affairs of neighboring prefectures, now one side and now the other rescues the other, and so they reach peace together. Thus in the sixth month of the year before last, soldiers of the original following from Tianping and Lufu in your garrison turned traitor and fled. They were barely a hundred in number, yet the trouble was no small one, and you sent a dispatch asking that they be pursued and taken. I, the commissioner here, had Liang Chu, the Qiang commander, lead the cavalry and attack them wherever they were, and I sent notices to each prefecture within my jurisdiction to send out picked soldiers and join their strength in the pursuit. Soon the several garrisons and the roving inspector of Dongtang took thirty-eight men one after another, and as soon as they were brought in captive I had them sent under escort. Then a report came from Liang Chu: reaching the border of Haozhou he caught up with the remnant brood and killed thirty and more, and the rest, who slipped the net, all fled wounded by the bow. The vile band taken alive were all executed in your province. That your heart could be made glad was truly owing to the labor spent on this side. Now, on the contrary, you have called to the rebel soldiers of Linhuai along the river, declared their surrender accepted, and gone on to fill posts with them; and though I have asked in dispatch after dispatch, you do not send them back across the river. How much wickedness is gathered up, and how deep this nursing of crookedness goes. Should I dare say that kindness is repaid with rancor? Truly I fear that in ease one forgets danger. The Book of Songs says, "You throw me a quince, and I repay it with fine jade. It is not a repayment; it is to be friends forever." This is the teaching left by the Airs of the States, bright and clear to see. Your Excellency is open to what is humane. Weigh this in some detail, and do not bring the world's derision upon yourself. The rest I have set out in full in my reply dispatch. I humbly beg you to look down and examine it.

Interlinear notes 1

The received text has 詩, taken here as an error for 許 and read accordingly. The "Qiang commander" above may be a surname or may be a fault in the received text; this could not be decided, so it has been left as it stands. — tr.