Yetgeul › Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) › Weighing Knowledge

Liangzhi — Measuring Knowledge量知篇

Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) 論衡 · Wang Chong · About AD 80 · 10 passages · 2,008 Chinese characters · reading time 8.0 min

Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) Weighing Knowledge Wang Chong, a man of the Later Han, gave the sense of his book in four characters — hating what is empty and false. He takes up one by one the sayings of his age: that Heaven answers the affairs of men and sends down calamity, that the dead become ghosts and take revenge, that a man must choose his days or come to harm. The grain of his argument is unlike others'. He does not let a saying stand because an elder said it — he questions Confucius, he pricks Mencius, he holds Han Fei wrong. To the saying that Heaven rebukes men and sends calamity he asks back: then why, for one ruler, does Heaven send drought upon a whole country? Nine chapters bearing the word "empty" stand in a row, taking up in turn the marvels written in the old books, and three bearing the word "swollen" deal with how words grow past their size. The chapter on fortune and misfortune has the tale of Dongmyeong of Buyeo, who shot so well with the bow that the king wished to kill him, and who fled south and came to the Yanhu River. It is the earliest form of the Dongmyeong record that survives.

《程材》所論,論材能行操,未言學知之殊奇也。夫儒生之所以過文吏者,學問日多,簡練其性,雕琢其材也。故夫學者所以反情治性,盡材成德也。材盡德成,其比於文吏亦雕琢者,程量多矣。貧人與富人,俱齎錢百,并為賻禮死哀之家。知之者知貧人劣能共百,以為富人饒羨有奇餘也;不知之者,見錢俱百,以為財貨貧富皆若一也。文吏、儒生(皆)有似於此。皆為掾吏,并典一曹,將知之者,知文吏、儒生筆同,而儒生胸中之藏,尚多奇餘。不知之者,以為皆吏,深淺多少同一量,失實甚矣。地性生草,山性生木。如地種葵韭,山樹棗栗,名曰美園茂林,不復與一恆地庸山比矣。文吏、儒生,有似於此,俱有材能,并用筆墨,而儒生奇有先王之道。先王之道,非徒葵韭棗栗之謂也。恆女之手,紡績織經;如或奇能,織錦刺繡,名曰卓殊,不復與恆女科矣。夫儒生與文吏程材,而儒生侈有經傳之學,猶女工織錦刺繡之奇也。

What the Chengcai chapter discussed was ability and conduct and bearing; it did not speak of what is special in learning and knowing. Now the reason the Confucian scholar surpasses the clerk is that his learning grows by the day, so that his nature is sifted and tempered and his ability carved and polished. Therefore learning is what turns the feelings back and orders the nature, exhausts the ability and completes the virtue. When ability is exhausted and virtue complete, then, set beside the clerk who has also been carved and polished, there is much to grade and measure. A poor man and a rich man both bring a hundred coins and together make the gift of condolence at a house in mourning for the dead. He who knows knows that the poor man, though he can ill afford it, offers a hundred, while the rich man has plenty and something over. He who does not know sees that the coins are a hundred in both cases and holds that in goods the poor and the rich are all alike. Clerks and Confucian scholars have something like this. When both have become section clerks and hold one section together, the chief who knows knows that the brush of clerk and of Confucian scholar is the same, but that what the scholar stores within his breast still has much to spare. He who does not know holds that both are clerks, and that deep and shallow, much and little, are all of one measure; and this loses the reality greatly. The nature of the earth brings forth grass, and the nature of the mountain brings forth trees. But plant mallow and leek in the earth and jujube and chestnut on the mountain, and they are called a fair garden and a thriving wood, and are no longer set beside a common field and an ordinary hill. Clerks and Confucian scholars have something like this. Both have ability and both use brush and ink, but the Confucian scholar has besides the Way of the former kings. The Way of the former kings is not merely a matter of mallow and leek and jujube and chestnut. The hands of an ordinary woman spin thread and weave cloth; but if one has a rare skill and weaves brocade and works embroidery, she is called outstandingly different and is no longer put in the same class as an ordinary woman. Now in grading the ability of the Confucian scholar and the clerk, the scholar's ample learning of the Classics and their traditions is like the rare skill of the woman who weaves brocade and works embroidery.

貧人好濫而富人守節者,貧人不足而富人饒侈。儒生不為非而文吏好為奸者,文吏少道德而儒生多仁義也。貧人富人,并為賓客,受賜於主人,富人不慚而貧人常愧者,富人有以效,貧人無以復也。儒生、文吏,俱以長吏為主人者也。儒生受長吏之祿,報長吏以道;文吏空胸無仁義之學,居往食祿,終無以效,所謂尸位素餐者也。素者,空也;空虛無德,餐人之祿,故曰素餐。無道藝之業,不曉政治,默坐朝庭,不能言事,與尸無異,故曰尸位。然則文吏所謂尸位素餐者也。居右食嘉,見將傾邪,豈能舉記陳言得失乎?一則不能見是非,二則畏罰不敢直言。《禮》曰:「情欲巧。」

The poor man loves to overreach and the rich man keeps his principle, because the poor man has not enough and the rich man has plenty to spare. The Confucian scholar does not do wrong and the clerk loves to work craft, because the clerk is small in the virtue of the Way and the scholar is large in benevolence and right. When a poor man and a rich man are both guests and receive a gift from their host, the rich man is not ashamed and the poor man is always abashed, because the rich man has something to return and the poor man has nothing to return with. The Confucian scholar and the clerk both take the senior officer for their host. The scholar receives the pay of the senior officer and repays him with the Way. The clerk has an empty breast with no learning of benevolence and right; he stays on and eats his pay and in the end has nothing to repay with. He is what is called shiwei sucan. Su means empty. To be empty and without virtue and yet eat another man's pay is called sucan. To have no work of the Way and of the arts, not to understand government, to sit silent in the court and be unable to speak of affairs, is no different from being a corpse, and so it is called shiwei. Then the clerk is what is called shiwei sucan. Standing on the right hand and eating what is good, when he sees his chief leaning into crookedness, how could he raise up a record and set out the right and the wrong of it? First, he cannot see right from wrong. Second, he fears punishment and dares not speak straight. The Li says, "The feelings would be deft."

其能力言者,文丑不好(者),有骨無肉,脂腴不足,犯干將(相)指,遂取間。為地戰者不能立功名,貪爵祿者不能諫於上。文吏貪爵祿,一日居位,輒欲圖利以當資用,侵漁徇身,不為將(貪)官顯義。雖見太山之惡,安肯揚舉毛髪之言。事理如此,何用自解於尸位素餐乎?儒生學大義,以道事將,不可則止,有大臣之志,以經勉為公正之操,敢言者也。位又疏遠,遠而近諫,禮謂之諂,此則郡縣之府庭所以常廓無人者也。

Those who can speak with force write badly and are not liked; they have bone and no flesh and lack fat and richness, so that they offend the will of chief and minister and end by drawing a breach. He who fights for land cannot set up merit and a name, and he who covets rank and pay cannot remonstrate with those above. The clerk covets rank and pay, and once he has been a day in his place he means at once to plan for gain and make it his stock. He takes by force and follows his own body, and does not bring right into the open for his chief and his office. Though he see an evil as big as Mount Tai, how would he be willing to lift up a word as small as a hair? Since the principle of the matter is such, with what will he clear himself of shiwei sucan? The Confucian scholar learns the great meanings and serves his chief with the Way, and when it will not do he stops. He has the will of a great minister, and by the Classics he works to make his bearing just and fair, and he is one who dares to speak. But his place is also far off and loosely joined; and for a man who is far off to remonstrate as though he were near is what the Li calls flattery. This is why the yards of the offices of commandery and county are always wide and empty of men.

或曰:「文吏筆扎之能,而治定簿書,考理煩事,雖無道學,筋力材能盡於朝庭,此亦報上之效驗也。」

Someone says, "The clerk, with his skill at brush and tablet, orders and settles the registers and looks into and manages troublesome affairs. Though he has no learning of the Way, he gives his sinew and strength and ability wholly to the court, and this too is proof that he repays those above."

曰:此有似於貧人負官重責,貧無以償,則身為官作,責乃畢竟。夫官之作,非屋廡則牆壁也。屋廡則用斧斤,牆壁則用筑鍤。荷斤斧,把筑鍤,與彼握刀持筆何以殊?

The answer is this. It is like a poor man who bears a heavy debt to the office and, being poor, has nothing to pay it with, and so works for the office with his body until the debt is at last worked off. Now the work of the office is either houses or walls. For houses the axe and the adze are used, and for walls the rammer and the spade. How does shouldering the axe and the adze and grasping the rammer and the spade differ from holding that knife and taking up that brush?

苟謂治文書者報上之效驗,此則治屋廡牆壁之人,亦報上也。俱為官作,刀筆斧斤筑鍤鈞也。抱布貿絲,交易有亡,各得所願。儒生抱道貿祿,文吏無所抱,何用貿易?農商殊業,所畜之貨,貨不可同,計其精粗,量其多少,其出溢者名曰富人,富人在世,鄉里願之。夫先王之道,非徒農商之貨也;其為長吏立功致化,百徒富多出溢之榮也。且儒生之業,豈徒出溢哉?其身簡練,知慮光明,見是非,審尤(可)奇也。

If the man who orders documents is truly to be called proof of repaying those above, then the man who builds houses and walls repays those above as well. Both work for the office, and knife and brush, axe and adze, rammer and spade are all of a piece. To carry cloth and trade it for silk is to buy and sell where one has and the other lacks, so that each gets what he wished for. The Confucian scholar carries the Way and buys his pay with it. The clerk carries nothing; with what will he buy and sell? Farmer and merchant have different work, and the goods they store up cannot be the same. Reckon how fine or coarse they are and measure how many or few, and the man whose goods run over is called a rich man; and when a rich man is in the world his village wishes for him. Now the Way of the former kings is not merely the goods of farmer and merchant. That a man should set up merit and bring about right teaching for his senior officer is, among all the crowd, the glory of being rich and having much that runs over. And how should the work of the Confucian scholar be a running over only? His own person is sifted and tempered, his knowledge and thought are bright, he sees right from wrong, and he looks into what is most rare.

蒸所與眾山之材干同也,(代)〔伐〕以為蒸,熏以火,(煙)〔〕熱究浹,光色澤潤,之於堂,其耀浩廣,火灶之效加也。繡之未刺,錦之未織,恆絲庸帛,何以異哉?加五采之巧,施針縷之飾,文章炫耀,黼黻華蟲,山龍日月。學士有文章(之學),猶絲帛之有五色之巧也。本質不能相過,學業積聚,超逾多矣。物實無中核者謂之郁,無刀斧之斷者謂之朴。文吏不學,世之教無核也,郁朴之人,孰與程哉?骨曰切,象曰磋,玉曰琢,石曰磨,切磋琢磨,乃成寶器。人之學問知能成就,猶骨象玉石切磋琢磨也。雖欲勿用,賢君其舍諸?孫武、闔廬,世之善用兵者也,知或學其法者,戰必勝。不曉什伯之陣,不知擊刺之術者,強使之軍,軍覆師敗,無其法也。谷之始熟曰粟。舂之於臼,簸其秕糠;蒸之於甑,爨之以火,成熟為飯,乃甘可食。可食而食之,味生肌腴成也。粟未為米,米未成飯,氣腥未熟,食之傷人。夫人之不學,猶谷未成粟,米未為飯也。知心亂少,猶食腥谷,氣傷人也。學士簡練於學,成熟於師,身之有益,猶谷成飯,食之生肌腴也。銅錫未采,在眾石之間,工師鑿掘,爐(橐)〔〕鑄鑠乃成器。未更爐(橐)〔〕,名曰積石,積石與彼路畔之瓦、山間之礫,一實也。故夫谷未舂蒸曰粟,銅未鑄鑠曰積石,人未學問曰。者,竹木之類也。夫竹生於山,木長於林,未知所入。截竹為筒,破以為牒,加筆墨之跡,乃成文字,大者為經,小者為傳記。斷木為槧,之為板,力加刮削,乃成奏牘。夫竹木,粗苴之物也,雕琢刻削,乃成為器用。況人含天地之性,最為貴者乎!

Kindling is the same in stem and stock as the timber of all the hills; but cut it for kindling, smoke it over fire so that smoke and heat soak all through it and its color is glossy and rich, and set it in the hall, and its shining is broad and wide. The work of fire and stove has been added to it. Before the embroidery is stitched and the brocade woven, how do the common thread and the ordinary silk differ from any other? Add to them the deftness of the five colors and lay on the adornment of needle and thread, and the figures shine out: the axe pattern and the paired-bow pattern, the flowery bird, the mountain, the dragon, the sun and the moon. That the scholar has letters is like thread and silk having the deftness of the five colors. In their root stuff they cannot pass one another, but where learning is piled up the going beyond is great. A thing with no kernel inside it is called yu (郁). A thing that knife and axe have not cut is called pu (朴). The clerk does not learn, so the teaching of the age has no kernel in him; and with a man who is yu and pu, what is there to grade? Of bone it is said qie, to cut. Of ivory it is said cuo, to file. Of jade it is said zhuo, to carve. Of stone it is said mo, to polish. Only by cutting and filing and carving and polishing does a thing become a precious vessel. That a man's learning and his knowing and ability come to completion is like the cutting and filing and carving and polishing of bone and ivory and jade and stone. Even if one wished not to use such a man, would a worthy ruler cast him aside? Sun Wu and Helü were men of the age who used soldiers well, and one who knows, or who has learned their method, will surely win when he fights. Force a man who does not understand the formations of tens and hundreds and does not know the art of striking and stabbing to lead soldiers, and the soldiers are overturned and the host defeated, because he has not the method. Grain when it first ripens is called su (粟). Pound it in the mortar and winnow out its husks and chaff, steam it in the pot and put fire beneath it, and when it is cooked through it becomes a meal and is sweet and fit to eat. Fit to eat and eaten, it makes its taste and puts flesh on the body. While the grain has not become husked rice and the rice has not become a cooked meal, its breath is raw and unripe, and eating it harms a man. Now a man's not learning is like grain that has not become su and rice that has not become a meal. That his knowledge and his mind are troubled and small is like eating raw grain, whose breath harms a man. That the scholar is sifted and tempered in learning and ripened by his teacher, so that it profits his person, is like grain becoming a meal, which when eaten puts flesh on the body. Copper and tin, while they are still unmined among the many stones, must be cut and dug out by the workman and cast and melted at the bellows before they become a vessel. Before they have passed the bellows they are called jishi, piled stone; and piled stone is one in reality with the tiles by the roadside and the pebbles among the hills. Therefore grain that has not been pounded and steamed is called su, copper that has not been cast and melted is called jishi, and a man who has not learned and asked is called meng (矇). Meng is of the sort of bamboo and wood. Now bamboo grows on the hills and trees grow up in the forest, and they do not yet know what they are to go into. Cut the bamboo to make a tube and split it to make slips, add to it the traces of brush and ink, and it becomes writing: the large becomes a Classic and the small becomes a record. Cut wood to make a board, saw it into planks, and put strength into the scraping, and it becomes a tablet for memorials. Now bamboo and wood are rough and coarse things, and only by carving and polishing and cutting and scraping do they become a thing of use. How much more so with man, who holds within him the nature of Heaven and earth and is the most honored of all!

不入師門,無經傳之教,以郁朴之實,不曉禮義,立之朝庭,植笮樹表之類也,其何益哉?山野草茂,鉤鐮斬刈,乃成道路也。士未入道門,邪惡未除,猶山野草木未斬刈,不成路也。染練布帛,名之曰采,貴吉之服也。無染練之治名粗,粗不吉,喪人服之。人無道學,仕宦朝庭,其不能招致也,猶喪人服粗不能招吉也。能削柱梁,謂之木匠。能穿鑿穴坎,謂之士匠。能雕琢文書,謂之史匠。夫文吏之學,學治文書也,當與木土之匠同科,安得程於儒生哉?御史之遇文書,不失分銖。有司之陳籩豆,不誤行伍。其巧習者,亦先學之,人不貴者也,小賤之能,非尊大之職也。無經藝之本,有筆墨之末,大道未足而小伎過多,雖曰吾多學問,御史之知、有司之惠也。飯黍梁者饜,餐糟糠者飽,雖俱曰食,為腴不同。儒生文吏,學俱稱習,其於朝庭,有益不鈞。

If a man does not enter the teacher's gate and has no teaching of the Classics and their traditions, and with the substance of one who is yu and pu does not understand ritual and right, then to set him up in the court is of the sort of setting up a fence and planting a marker. What profit is there in it? When grass grows thick on hill and field, it must be cut with hook and sickle before it becomes a road. That the scholar has not yet entered the gate of the Way and his crookedness is not yet cleared away is like the grass and trees of hill and field not yet cut, so that there is no road. When cloth and silk are dyed and finished they are called colored, and they are honored and auspicious clothing. What has no dyeing and finishing is called coarse; and coarse is not auspicious, and the mourner wears it. That a man without the learning of the Way, holding office in the court, cannot call good things to him is like the mourner in coarse cloth being unable to call what is auspicious. One who can shape pillar and beam is called a carpenter in wood. One who can bore holes and dig pits is called a workman in earth. One who can carve and polish documents is called a craftsman of records. Now the learning of the clerk is the learning of how to order documents, and it ought to be put in the same class as the workman in wood and earth. How can it be graded against the Confucian scholar? The censor handles documents without losing a fraction or a grain. The officer in charge sets out the ritual vessels without mistaking a row. Those who are deft at it have also learned it beforehand; but men do not hold it precious, because it is a small and mean ability and not a high and great office. To have no root of the Classics and the arts but the tip of brush and ink, to fall short in the great Way and have too much of small skill, is, though a man say that his learning is much, the knowledge of a censor and the wit of an officer in charge. He who eats millet and fine grain is satisfied and he who eats dregs and chaff is filled; and though both are said to eat, what puts flesh on them is not the same. Confucian scholars and clerks are both said to have practiced their learning, but their profit to the court is not equal.

鄭子皮使尹何為政,子產比於未能操刀使之割也。子路使子羔為費宰,孔子曰:「賊夫人之子。」皆以未學不見大道也。醫無方術,云:「吾能治病。」問之曰:「何用治病?」曰:「用心意。」病者必不信也。吏無經學,曰:「吾能治民。」問之曰:「何用治民?」曰:「以材能。」

When Zipi of Zheng set Yin He to govern, Zichan likened it to making a man cut with a knife when he cannot yet hold one. When Zilu made Zigao steward of Bi, Confucius said, "You are harming another man's son." In both cases it was because they had not yet learned and did not see the great Way. If a physician who has no method of his art says, "I can cure sickness," and is asked, "With what do you cure sickness?" and answers, "With my heart and mind," the sick man will surely not believe him. A clerk who has no learning of the Classics says, "I can govern the people"; and asked, "With what do you govern the people?" he answers, "With ability."

是醫無方術,以心意治病也,百姓安肯信向,而人君任用使之乎!手中無錢之市,使貨主問曰「錢何在」,對曰「無錢」,貨主必不與也。夫胸中不學,猶手中無錢也。欲人君任使之,百姓信向之,奈何也!

This is a physician curing sickness with heart and mind and no method of his art. How would the people be willing to believe in him and turn to him, and how would the ruler entrust him with office and employ him! Go to the market with no money in your hand, and when the owner of the goods asks, "Where is your money?" and you answer, "I have no money," the owner will surely not give them to you. Now to have no learning in the breast is like having no money in the hand. To wish the ruler to entrust and employ you, and the people to believe in you and turn to you, what is to be done!