Jiangrui — Discoursing on Auspicious Signs講瑞篇
儒者之論,自說見鳳皇、騏而知之。何則?案鳳皇、騏之象。又《春秋》獲麟文曰:「有而角。」
The discussions of the scholars say of themselves that they would know the phoenix and the qilin on sight. Why so? They examine the figures of the phoenix and the qilin. And the text in the Chunqiu on the taking of the qilin says, "It is a roe deer, and it has a horn."
獐而角者,則是騏矣。其見鳥而象鳳皇者則鳳皇矣。黃帝、堯、舜、周之盛時皆致鳳皇。孝宣帝之時,鳳皇集於上林,後又於長樂之宮東門樹上,高五尺,文章五色。周獲麟,麟似獐而角。武帝之麟,亦如獐而角。如有大鳥,文章五色;獸狀如獐,首戴一角:考以圖象,驗之古今,則鳳、麟可得審也。
A roe deer that has a horn is the qilin. A bird that is seen and matches the figure of the phoenix is the phoenix. In the flourishing times of the Yellow Emperor, of Yao, of Shun and of Zhou, all of them brought the phoenix down. In the time of Emperor Xiaoxuan a phoenix gathered at Shanglin, and later again on a tree at the east gate of the Changle palace; it was five feet high and its markings were of five colors. Zhou took a qilin, and the qilin was like a roe deer and had a horn. The qilin of Emperor Wu was also like a roe deer and had a horn. If there is a great bird with markings of five colors, and a beast shaped like a roe deer bearing a single horn on its head, then by examining them with pictures and figures and proving them by old times and now, the phoenix and the qilin can be made sure of.
夫鳳皇,鳥之聖者也;騏,獸之聖者也;五帝、三王、皋陶、孔子,人之聖也。十二聖相各不同,而欲以獐戴角則謂之騏,相與鳳皇象合者謂之鳳皇,如何?夫聖鳥獸毛色不同,猶十二聖骨體不均也。
Now the phoenix is the sage among birds, and the qilin is the sage among beasts; the Five Emperors, the Three Kings, Gao Yao and Confucius are the sages among men. The figures of the twelve sages are each unlike the others, and yet men wish to call a roe deer that bears a horn a qilin, and to call whatever matches the figure of the phoenix a phoenix. How can that be? That the hair and color of sage birds and beasts are not the same is like the bones and bodies of the twelve sages not being alike.
戴角之相,猶戴午也。顓頊戴午,堯、舜必未然。今魯所獲麟戴角,即後所見麟未必戴角也。如用魯所獲麟求知世間之麟,則必不能知也。何則?毛羽骨角不合同也。假令不同,或時似類,未必真是。虞舜重瞳,王莽亦重瞳;晉文駢脅,張儀亦駢脅。如以骨體毛色比,則王莽,虞舜;而張儀,晉文也。有若在魯,最似孔子。孔子死,弟子共坐有若,問以道事,有若不能對者,何也?體狀似類,實性非也。今五色之鳥,一角之獸,或時似類鳳皇、騏,其實非真,而說者欲以骨體毛色定鳳皇、騏,誤矣!是故顏淵庶幾,不似孔子;有若恆庸,反類聖人。由是言之,或時真鳳皇、騏骨體不似,恆庸鳥獸毛色類真,知之如何?
The figure of bearing a horn is like bearing the wu (午). Zhuanxu bore the wu, but Yao and Shun surely did not. The qilin that Lu took bore a horn, but a qilin seen afterward need not bear a horn. If a man uses the qilin that Lu took to seek out and know the qilin of the world, he surely cannot know it. Why so? Hair and feather, bone and horn do not agree. And even if they do not agree, a thing that at times looks of the same kind is not surely the true one. Yu Shun had double pupils, and Wang Mang also had double pupils; Duke Wen of Jin had joined ribs, and Zhang Yi also had joined ribs. If one compares by bone and body and the color of the hair, then Wang Mang is Yu Shun and Zhang Yi is Duke Wen of Jin. You Ruo was in Lu, and he was most like Confucius. When Confucius died, the disciples together seated You Ruo and asked him about the affairs of the Way, and You Ruo could not answer. Why was that? His body and shape were of a like kind, but his true nature was not. Now a bird of five colors and a beast with a single horn may at times be of a kind like the phoenix and the qilin, and yet in truth not be true ones; and those who discuss them wish to settle the phoenix and the qilin by bone and body and the color of the hair. They are wrong! Therefore Yan Yuan came near to the sage and was not like Confucius, while You Ruo was common and ordinary and yet resembled the sage. Speaking from this, the true phoenix and qilin may at times be unlike in bone and body, and common and ordinary birds and beasts may be like the true ones in the color of their hair. How then is one to know them?
儒者自謂見鳳皇、騏輒而知之,則是自謂見聖人輒而知之也。皋陶馬口,孔子反宇,設後輒有知而絕殊,馬口反宇,尚未可謂聖。何則?十二聖相不同,前聖之相,難以照後聖也。骨法不同,姓名不等,身形殊狀,生出異土,雖復有聖,何如知之?
If the scholars say of themselves that they would know the phoenix and the qilin the moment they saw them, then they say of themselves that they would know a sage the moment they saw him. Gao Yao had the mouth of a horse and Confucius the head of an overturned roof. Suppose a man afterward had knowledge that set him quite apart, and the mouth of a horse and the head of an overturned roof as well: still he could not be called a sage. Why so? The figures of the twelve sages are not the same, and it is hard to light up a later sage by the figure of an earlier one. Their bone patterns are not the same, their surnames and names are not equal, their bodies and shapes differ, and the lands they came out of differ. Though a sage should come again, how is one to know him?
恆君山謂揚子雲曰:「如後世復有聖人,徒知其才能之勝己,多不能知其聖與非聖人也。」子云曰:「誠然。」
Huan Junshan said to Yang Ziyun, "If in a later age there is a sage again, men will merely know that his talent surpasses their own, and for the most part they will not be able to know whether he is a sage or not a sage." Yang Ziyun said, "Truly so."
夫聖人難知,知能之美若桓、揚者,尚復不能知。世儒懷庸庸之知,無異之議,見聖不能知,可保必也。夫不能知聖,則不能知鳳皇與騏。世人名鳳皇、騏,何用自謂能之乎?夫上世之名鳳皇、騏,聞其鳥獸之奇者耳。毛角有奇,又不妄翔苟游,與鳥獸爭飽,則謂之鳳皇、騏矣。
Now the sage is hard to know, and even men as fine in knowledge and ability as Huan and Yang still could not know him. The scholars of the world hold a commonplace knowledge and have no discussion of their own, so one may warrant that they will surely see a sage and not know him. And if they cannot know a sage, they cannot know the phoenix and the qilin. When men of the world name the phoenix and the qilin, on what ground do they say that they can know them? When the ages above named the phoenix and the qilin, they had only heard of a bird and a beast that were strange. Their hair and horn had something strange, and they did not fly at random or roam carelessly or strive with the birds and beasts for a full belly, and so men called them the phoenix and the qilin.
世人之知聖,亦猶此也。聞聖人人之奇者,身有奇骨,知能博達,則謂之聖矣。及其知之,非卒見暫聞而輒名之為聖也,與之偃伏,從(文)〔之〕受學,然後知之。何以明之?子貢事孔子一年,自謂過孔子;二年,自謂與孔子同;三年,自知不及孔子。當一年、二年之時,未知孔子聖也;三年之後,然乃知之。以子貢知孔子,三年乃定。世儒無子貢之才,其見聖人不從之學,任倉卒之視,無三年之接,自謂知聖,誤矣!少正卯在魯,與孔子并。孔子之門,三盈三虛,唯顏淵不去,顏淵獨知孔子聖也。夫門人去孔子歸少正卯,不徒不難知孔子之聖,又不能知少正卯,門人皆惑。
Men of the world know a sage in the same way. When they hear that a sage is the strange one among men, that his body has strange bones and his knowledge and ability are broad and penetrating, they call him a sage. But as for coming to know him, it is not by a sudden sight or a moment's hearing that they at once name him a sage; they lie down and rise with him and follow him and receive learning from him, and only then do they know him. How is this made clear? Zigong served Confucius one year and said of himself that he surpassed Confucius; in the second year he said of himself that he was the same as Confucius; in the third year he knew of himself that he did not come up to Confucius. In the first year and the second he did not know that Confucius was a sage; only after the third year did he know it. For Zigong to know Confucius, it was settled only in the third year. The scholars of the world have not the talent of Zigong, and they see a sage and do not follow him to learn; they trust to a hurried glance and have not three years of company, and yet they say of themselves that they know a sage. They are wrong! Shaozheng Mao was in Lu, standing level with Confucius. The gate of Confucius filled three times and emptied three times, and only Yan Yuan did not leave; Yan Yuan alone knew that Confucius was a sage. That the disciples left Confucius and went over to Shaozheng Mao means not only that the sagehood of Confucius was hard to know, but that they could not know Shaozheng Mao either. The disciples were all deluded.
子貢曰:「夫少正卯,魯之聞人也。子為政,何以先之?」孔子曰:「賜退,非爾所及。」
Zigong said, "Now Shaozheng Mao is a man of note in Lu. You are carrying on the government; why do you put him first?" Confucius said, "Withdraw, Ci. This is not what you can reach."
夫才能知佞若子貢,尚不能知聖。世儒見聖自謂能知之,妄也!
Now even one whose talent could know a flatterer, like Zigong, still could not know the sage. That the scholars of the world see a sage and say of themselves that they can know him is wild talk!
夫以不能知聖言之,則亦知其不能知鳳皇與騏也。使鳳皇羽翮長廣,騏體高大,則見之者以為大鳥巨獸耳。何以別之?如必巨大別之,則其知聖人亦宜以巨大。春秋之時,鳥有爰居,不可以為鳳皇;長狄來至,不可以為聖人。然則鳳皇、騏與鳥獸等也,世人見之,何用知之?如以中國無有,從野外來而知之,則是鵒同也。鵒,非中國之禽也。鳳皇、騏,亦非中國之禽獸也。皆非中國之物,儒者何以謂鵒惡、鳳皇騏善乎?
Now speaking from their not being able to know a sage, one knows also that they cannot know the phoenix and the qilin. Suppose the phoenix had wings long and broad and the qilin a body tall and great: those who saw them would take them for a great bird and a huge beast, and nothing more. By what would they tell them apart? If they must be told apart by hugeness, then a sage too ought to be known by hugeness. In the time of the Chunqiu there was a bird called the yuanju, and it could not be taken for a phoenix; Changdi came, and he could not be taken for a sage. That being so, the phoenix and the qilin are the same as birds and beasts, and when men of the world see them, by what do they know them? If they know them because there are none in the Middle Kingdom and they have come from beyond the wilds, then it is the same with the myna. The myna is not a bird of the Middle Kingdom. The phoenix and the qilin are not birds and beasts of the Middle Kingdom either. Neither of them is a thing of the Middle Kingdom; on what ground do the scholars call the myna evil and the phoenix and the qilin good?
或曰:「孝宣之時,鳳皇集於上林,群鳥從(上)〔之〕以千萬數。以其眾鳥之長,聖神有異,故群鳥附從。」
Someone says, "In the time of Emperor Xiaoxuan a phoenix gathered at Shanglin, and the flocking birds that followed it were counted by the thousand and the ten thousand. Because it is the elder of the many birds and is sagely and divine and has something unlike them, the flocking birds attached themselves and followed it."
如見大鳥來集,群鳥附之,則是鳳皇,鳳皇審則定矣。夫鳳皇與騏同性,鳳皇見,群鳥從;騏見,眾獸亦宜隨。案春秋之麟,不言眾獸隨之。宣帝、武帝皆行騏,無眾獸附從之文。如以騏為人所獲,附從者散,鳳皇人不獲,自來蜚翔,附從可見。《書》曰:「簫《韶》九成,鳳皇來儀。」
If seeing a great bird come down and gather with the flocking birds attached to it means that it is a phoenix, then the phoenix is made sure of and settled. Now the phoenix and the qilin are of one nature: if, when the phoenix appears, the flocking birds follow, then when the qilin appears the many beasts ought to follow too. Look at the qilin of the Chunqiu: it does not say that the many beasts followed it. Emperor Xuan and Emperor Wu both took qilin, and there is no text of many beasts attaching themselves and following. If it be said that the qilin was taken by men and those attached to it scattered, still the phoenix is not taken by men but comes of itself and flies about, so what attaches itself and follows can be seen. The Documents says, "When the Shao was played through nine times on the flutes, the phoenix came and danced."
《大傳》曰:「鳳皇在列樹。」不言群鳥從也。豈宣帝所致者異哉?
The Dazhuan says, "The phoenix was in the ranked trees." It does not say that the flocking birds followed. Was what Emperor Xuan brought down of another sort, then?
或曰:「記事者失之。唐、虞之君,鳳皇實有附從。上世久遠,記事遺失,經書之文,未足以實也。」
Someone says, "The recorders of events left it out. In the time of the rulers of Tang and Yu the phoenix truly had followers attached to it. The ages above are long ago and far off, and in the recording of events things were dropped and lost; the text of the classics is not enough to make it sure."
夫實有而記事者失之,亦有實無而記事者生之。夫如是,儒書之文,難以實事,案附從以知鳳皇,未得實也。且人有佞猾而聚者,鳥亦有佼黠而從群者。當唐、虞之時,鳳愨願,宣帝之時佼黠乎?何其俱有聖人之德行,動作之操不均同也?
Now there are things that truly were and the recorder of events left out, and there are also things that truly were not and the recorder of events brought into being. If it is so, the text in the books of the scholars is hard to take for fact, and to know the phoenix by looking at what attaches itself and follows does not get at the truth. Moreover, among men there are the flattering and crafty who gather a crowd, and among birds too there are the sly and cunning that follow the flock. In the time of Tang and Yu was the phoenix honest and simple, and in the time of Emperor Xuan sly and cunning? How is it that both have the virtuous conduct of a sage, and yet their bearing in what they do is not alike?
無鳥附從,或時是鳳皇;群鳥附從,或時非也。君子在世,清節自守,不廣結從,出入動作,人不附從。豪猾之人,任使用氣,往來進退,士眾云合。夫鳳皇,君子也,必以隨多者效鳳皇,是豪黠為君子也。歌曲彌妙,和者彌寡;行操益清,交者益鮮。鳥獸亦然,必以附從效鳳皇,是用和多為妙曲也。龍與鳳皇為比類。宣帝之時,黃龍出於新丰,群蛇不隨。神雀鸞鳥,皆眾鳥之長也,其仁聖雖不及鳳皇,然其從群鳥亦宜數十。信陵、孟嘗,食客三千,稱為賢君。漢將軍衛青及將軍霍去病,門無一客,亦稱名將。太史公曰:「盜蹠橫行,聚党數千人。伯夷、叔齊,隱處首陽山。」
With no birds attached and following it may at times still be a phoenix; with flocking birds attached and following it may at times not be. When a gentleman is in the world he keeps himself by a pure integrity and does not tie himself widely to a following, and in his going out and coming in and in what he does men do not attach themselves to him. The bold and crafty man uses and spends his spirit, and in his going and coming, his advance and retreat, gentlemen and crowds gather like clouds. Now the phoenix is a gentleman; if one must prove the phoenix by the number that follow, then the bold and sly man is the gentleman. The finer the song, the fewer sing with it; the purer a man's conduct and bearing, the rarer those who befriend him. It is so with birds and beasts too: if one must prove the phoenix by what attaches itself and follows, this is to take many voices joining in for a fine tune. The dragon is of a kind to set beside the phoenix. In the time of Emperor Xuan a yellow dragon came out at Xinfeng, and the flocking snakes did not follow it. The divine sparrow and the luan bird are both elders of the many birds, and though their goodness and sagehood do not come up to the phoenix, still the flocking birds that follow them ought to number some tens. Xinling and Mengchang had three thousand guests at their table and were called worthy lords. The Han general Wei Qing (衛青) and the general Huo Qubing had not one guest at the gate, and they too were called famous generals. The Grand Historian said, "Robber Zhi went about at large and gathered a party of several thousand men. Bo Yi and Shu Qi lived hidden on Mount Shouyang."
鳥獸之操,與人相似。人之得眾,不足以別賢。以鳥附從審鳳皇,如何?
The bearing of birds and beasts is like that of men. That a man gets a crowd is not enough to tell the worthy. To make the phoenix sure by the birds attached to it and following it, how can that be?
或曰:「鳳皇、騏,太平之瑞也。太平之際,見來至也。然亦有未太平而來至也。鳥獸奇骨異毛,卓絕非常,則是矣,何為不可知?鳳皇騏,通常以太平之時來至者,春秋之時,騏嘗嫌於王孔子而至。光武皇帝生於濟陽,鳳皇來集。」
Someone says, "The phoenix and the qilin are omens of great peace. In the season of great peace they appear and come. Yet there are also times when peace is not yet great and they come. When a bird or a beast has strange bones and unlike hair, standing quite apart from the common, that is the one; why can it not be known? The phoenix and the qilin commonly come in a time of great peace, but in the time of the Chunqiu the qilin once came because Confucius was held in suspicion of being made a king. Emperor Guangwu was born at Jiyang, and a phoenix came and gathered there."
夫光武始生之時,成、哀之際也,時未太平而鳳皇至。如以自為光武有聖德而來,是則為聖王始生之瑞,不為太平應也。嘉瑞或應太平,或為始生,其實難知。獨以太平之際驗之,如何?
Now when Guangwu was first born it was the season of Emperor Cheng and Emperor Ai, when peace was not yet great, and yet a phoenix came. If one holds of oneself that it came because Guangwu had the virtue of a sage, then it is an omen of a sage king's first birth and not an answer to great peace. A fine omen may answer to great peace, or may be for a first birth; the truth of it is hard to know. To prove it by the season of great peace alone, how can that be?
或曰:「鳳皇騏,生有種類,若龜龍有種類矣。龜故生龜,龍故生龍,形色小大,不異於前者也。見之父,察其子孫,何為不可知?」
Someone says, "The phoenix and the qilin have a kind in their birth, as the tortoise and the dragon have a kind. A tortoise begets a tortoise and a dragon begets a dragon, and their shape and color and size do not differ from those before them. Seeing the father, one examines the sons and grandsons; why can they not be known?"
夫恆物有種類,瑞物無種適生,故曰德應,龜龍然也。人見神龜、靈龍而別之乎?宋元王之時,漁者網,得神龜焉,漁父不知其神也。方今世儒,漁父之類也。以漁父而不知神龜,則亦知夫世人而不知靈龍也。
Now common things have their kinds, but an omen thing is born without a kind, just as it happens, and so it is called an answer to virtue; the tortoise and the dragon are so as well. Do men see a divine tortoise or a numinous dragon and tell them apart? In the time of King Yuan of Song a fisherman cast his net and got a divine tortoise, and the fisherman did not know that it was divine. The scholars of the world today are of the fisherman's sort. Since a fisherman could not know a divine tortoise, one knows also that the men of the world cannot know a numinous dragon.
龍或時似蛇,蛇或時似龍。韓子曰:「馬之似鹿者千金。」
A dragon may at times be like a snake, and a snake may at times be like a dragon. Hanzi said, "A horse that is like a deer is worth a thousand in gold."
良馬似鹿,神龍或時似蛇。如審有類,形色不異。王莽時有大鳥如馬,五色龍文,與眾鳥數十集於沛國蘄縣。宣帝時鳳皇集於地,高五尺,與言如馬身高同矣;文章五色,與言五色龍文,物色均矣;眾鳥數十,與言俱集、附從等也。如以宣帝時鳳皇體色眾鳥附從,安知鳳皇則王莽所致鳥鳳皇也。如審是王莽致之,是非瑞也。如非鳳皇,體色附從,何為均等?
A good horse is like a deer, and a numinous dragon may at times be like a snake. If they truly had their kinds, their shape and color would not differ. In the time of Wang Mang there was a great bird like a horse, of five colors with dragon markings, that gathered with some tens of flocking birds at Qi county (蘄縣) in the state of Pei. In the time of Emperor Xuan a phoenix gathered on the ground, five feet high, which is the same as the words about the height of a horse's body; its markings were of five colors, which matches in the color of the thing the words about five colors and dragon markings; and the flocking birds were some tens, which is the same as the words about gathering together and attaching and following. If one goes by the body and color of the phoenix in Emperor Xuan's time and the flocking birds attached to it, how does one know that the phoenix is the phoenix and not the bird that Wang Mang brought down? If it was truly Wang Mang who brought it down, then it is no omen. And if it was not a phoenix, why were its body and color and its followers just the same?
且瑞物皆起和氣而生,生於常類之中,而有詭異之性,則為瑞矣。故夫鳳皇之聖也,猶赤烏之集也。謂鳳皇有種,赤烏復有類乎?嘉禾、醴泉、甘露,嘉禾生於禾中,與禾中異穗,謂之嘉禾;醴泉、甘露,出而甘美也,皆泉、露生出,非天上有甘露之神,地下有醴泉之類,聖治公平而乃沾下產出也。莢、朱草亦生在地,集於眾草,無常本根,暫時產出,旬月枯折,故謂之瑞。夫鳳皇騏亦瑞也,何以有種類?
Moreover, omen things all rise from the breath of harmony and are born; born among the common kinds, they have a strange and unlike nature, and so they become omens. Therefore the sagehood of the phoenix is like the gathering of the red crows. If the phoenix has a kind, has the red crow a kind as well? Take the fine grain, the sweet spring and the sweet dew. The fine grain grows among the grain, and its ear differs from the ears among the grain, and so it is called fine grain; the sweet spring and the sweet dew come out sweet and good. All of them are spring water and dew that have come forth; it is not that there is a spirit of sweet dew above in Heaven and a kind of sweet spring below in the earth, which pour down and come out only when a sage's rule is just and even. The mingjia and the zhucao also grow in the earth and gather among the many plants, having no constant root; they come out for a while and wither and break in ten days or a month, and so they are called omens. Now the phoenix and the qilin are omens too; how should they have a kind?
案周太平,越常獻白雉。白雉,生短而白色耳,非有白雉之種也。魯人得戴角之獐,謂之騏,亦或時生於獐,非有騏之類。由此言之,鳳皇亦或時生於鵠鵲,毛奇羽殊,出異眾鳥,則謂之鳳皇耳,安得與眾鳥殊種類也?有若曰:「騏之於走獸,鳳皇之於飛鳥,太山之於丘垤,河海之於行潦,類也。」
Look: Zhou was at great peace, and Yuechang offered a white pheasant. The white pheasant is born short and white in color, that is all; there is no seed of white pheasants. A man of Lu got a roe deer that bore a horn and called it a qilin; that too may at times have been born of a roe deer, and there is no kind of qilin. Speaking from this, the phoenix too may at times be born of a swan or a magpie, and when its hair is strange and its feathers unlike, coming out beyond the flocking birds, men call it a phoenix, that is all. How can it be of a kind apart from the flocking birds? You Ruo said, "The qilin to the running beasts, the phoenix to the flying birds, Mount Tai to the hillocks and mounds, the Yellow River (河) and the sea to the puddles in the road: they are of a kind."
然則鳳皇、騏都與鳥獸同一類,體色詭耳,安得異種?同類而有奇,奇為不世,不世難審,識之如何?
That being so, the phoenix and the qilin are all of one kind with birds and beasts, only strange in body and color; how can they be of another kind? They are of the same kind and yet have something strange, and the strange is what the world does not always have, and what the world does not always have is hard to make sure of. How is one to know them?
堯生丹朱,舜生商均。商均、丹朱,堯、舜之類也,骨性詭耳。鯀生禹,瞽瞍生舜。舜、禹,鯀、瞽瞍之種也,知德殊矣。試種嘉禾之實,不能得嘉禾。恆見粢梁之粟,莖穗怪奇。人見叔梁紇,不知孔子父也;見伯魚,不知孔子之子也。張湯之父五尺,湯長八尺,湯孫長六尺。孝宣鳳皇高五尺,所從生鳥或時高二尺,後所生之鳥或時高一尺。安得常種?
Yao begot Danzhu and Shun begot Shangjun. Shangjun and Danzhu were of the kind of Yao and Shun, only strange in bone and nature. Gun begot Yu and Gusou begot Shun. Shun and Yu were the seed of Gun and Gusou, and their knowledge and virtue were different. Sow the grains of the fine grain for a trial, and you cannot get fine grain. In the millet and the panic grain that are seen every day, stalk and ear are odd and strange. Men see Shuliang He and do not know that he is the father of Confucius; they see Boyu and do not know that he is the son of Confucius. The father of Zhang Tang was five feet tall, Tang was eight feet tall, and Tang's grandson was six feet tall. The phoenix of Emperor Xiaoxuan was five feet high; the bird that bore it may at times have been two feet high, and the bird it bore afterward may at times be one foot high. How can there be a constant seed?
種類無常,故曾皙生參,氣性不世;顏路出回,古今卓絕。馬有千里,不必騏〔驥〕之駒;鳥有仁聖,不必鳳皇之雛。山頂之溪,不通江湖,然而有魚,水精自為之也;廢庭坏殿,基上草生,地氣自出之也。按溪水之魚,殿基上之草,無類而出。瑞應之自至,天地未必有種類也。
Kinds are not constant, and so Zeng Xi begot Shen, whose breath and nature the world had not seen, and Yan Lu brought forth Hui, who stood apart in all times. Among horses there are those that go a thousand li, and they need not be the colts of the qiji; among birds there are the good and sagely, and they need not be the chicks of the phoenix. A stream on a mountain top does not join the rivers and the lakes, and yet there are fish in it, for the essence of water made them of itself; on the foundations of a deserted courtyard and a fallen hall grass grows, for the breath of the earth brought it out of itself. Look at the fish of the mountain stream and the grass on the hall's foundation: they come out with no kind. When an omen's answer comes of itself, Heaven and earth need not have a kind for it.
夫瑞應猶災變也。瑞以應善,災以應惡;善惡雖反,其應一也。災變無種,瑞應亦無類也。陰陽之氣,天地之氣也,遭善而為和,遇惡而為變,豈天地為善惡之政,更生和變之氣乎?然則瑞應之出,殆無種類,因善而起,氣和而生。亦或時政平氣和,眾物變化,猶春則鷹變為鳩,秋則鳩化為鷹,蛇鼠之類輒為魚鱉,蝦蟆為鶉,雀為蜃蛤。物隨氣變,不可謂無。黃石為老父授張良書,去復為石也。儒知之。或時太平氣和,獐為騏,鵠為鳳皇。是故氣性隨時變化,豈必有常類哉?褒姒,玄黿之子,二龍也。晉之二卿,熊羆之裔也。吞燕子、薏苡、履大跡之語,世之人然之,獨謂瑞有常類哉?以物無種計之,以人無類議之,以體變化論之,鳳皇、騏生無常類,則形色何為當同!
Now the answer of omens is like calamities and strange changes. An omen answers to good and a calamity answers to evil; though good and evil are opposite, their answering is one. Calamities and strange changes have no seed, and so omen answers have no kind either. The breath of yin and yang is the breath of Heaven and earth; meeting good it becomes harmony, meeting evil it becomes a strange change. How should Heaven and earth carry on a good and an evil government and beget besides a breath of harmony and of strange change? That being so, the coming out of omen answers has, it seems, no kind: it rises by reason of good, and it is born when the breath is in harmony. And it may at times be that the government is even and the breath in harmony and the many things change, as in spring the hawk changes into a dove, and in autumn the dove turns into a hawk, and the sort of snakes and rats become fish and turtles, and the toad becomes a quail, and the sparrow becomes a clam. That things change following the breath cannot be called nothing. A yellow stone became an old man and gave Zhang Liang a book, and when it went away it became a stone again. The scholars know this. It may at times be that in great peace, when the breath is in harmony, a roe deer becomes a qilin and a swan becomes a phoenix. Therefore breath and nature change with the times; how must there be a constant kind? Bao Si was the child of a black turtle, that is, of two dragons. The two ministers of Jin were the offspring of a bear and a brown bear. The sayings about swallowing a swallow's egg, about the coix seed, and about treading in a great footprint, men of the world hold them true; and do they alone say that omens have a constant kind? Reckoning by the fact that things have no seed, discussing by the fact that men have no kind, arguing by the fact that bodies change, the phoenix and the qilin are born with no constant kind, and why then should their shape and color be the same!
案《禮記瑞命篇》云:「雄曰鳳,雌曰皇。雄鳴曰即即,雌鳴足足。」《詩》云:「梧桐生矣,於彼高岡。鳳皇鳴矣,於彼朝陽。萋萋,喈喈。」《瑞命》與《詩》,俱言鳳皇之鳴。《瑞命》之言「即即、足足」,《詩》云「、喈喈」,此聲異也。使聲審則形不同也。使審〔異〕同,《詩》與《禮》異。世傳鳳皇之鳴,故將疑焉。
Look at the Ruiming chapter of the Liji, which says, "The male is called feng and the female huang. The male's cry is jiji and the female's cry is zuzu." The Odes say, "The wutong has grown, there on the high ridge. The phoenix cries, there in the morning sun. Thick and thick, in harmony and in harmony." The Ruiming and the Odes both speak of the cry of the phoenix. The Ruiming says "jiji, zuzu" and the Odes say "yongyong, jiejie," and these sounds differ. If the sounds are true, then the shapes are not the same. If they are truly unlike and the same, then the Odes and the Rites differ. The world hands down the cry of the phoenix, and therefore one must doubt it.
案魯之獲麟云「有獐而角」。言有獐者,色如獐也。獐色有常,若鳥色有常矣。武王之時,火流為烏,云其色赤。赤非烏之色,故言其色赤。如似獐而色異,亦當言其色白若黑。今成事色同,故言「有獐」。獐無角,有異於故,故言「而角」也。夫如是,魯之所得者,若獐之狀也。武帝之時,西巡狩得白,一角而五趾。角或時同,言五趾者,足不同矣。魯所得麟,云有獐不言色者,獐無異色也。武帝云得白,色白不類獐,故〔不〕言有獐,正言白,色不同也。孝宣之時,九真貢,獻,狀如(獐)〔鹿〕而兩角者。
Look: when Lu took the qilin it said, "It is a roe deer and it has a horn." To say that it is a roe deer means that its color was like a roe deer's. A roe deer's color is constant, as a crow's color is constant. In the time of King Wu fire flowed down and became a crow, and it was said that its color was red. Red is not a crow's color, and so its color was said to be red. If it had been like a roe deer but unlike in color, it ought likewise to have said that its color was white or black. Now as the matter stands the color was the same, and so it said, "It is a roe deer." A roe deer has no horn, and here was something unlike the old, and so it said, "and it has a horn." If it is so, what Lu got was like the shape of a roe deer. In the time of Emperor Wu, on a tour of inspection to the west, a white qilin was taken, with one horn and five toes. The horn may at times have been the same, but the saying of five toes means the feet were not the same. Of the qilin that Lu got it is said that it was a roe deer and its color is not spoken of, because a roe deer has no unlike color. Of Emperor Wu it is said that a white qilin was got: its color being white and not of the roe deer's kind, it does not say that it was a roe deer but says straight out that it was white, its color not being the same. In the time of Emperor Xiaoxuan, Jiuzhen offered a qilin in tribute, shaped like a deer and having two horns.
孝武言一角,不同矣。春秋之麟如獐,宣帝之言如鹿。鹿與獐小大相倍,體不同也。
Emperor Xiaowu spoke of one horn, so they are not the same. The qilin of the Chunqiu was like a roe deer, and Emperor Xuan's words say like a deer. A deer and a roe deer are twice the other in size, so their bodies are not the same.
夫三王之時,毛色、角趾、身體高大,不相似類。推此准後世出,必不與前同,明矣!夫騏,鳳皇之類,騏前後體色不同,而欲以宣帝之時所見鳳皇高五尺,文章五色,准前況後,當復出鳳皇,謂與之同,誤矣!後當復出見之鳳皇、騏,必已不與前世見出者相似類。而世儒自謂見而輒知之,奈何?
Now in the time of the Three Kings the color of the hair, the horns and toes, and the height and size of the body were not of a like kind. Pushing from this to reckon what will come out in later ages, it is clear that it will surely not be the same as before! Now the qilin is of the kind of the phoenix, and the qilin is not the same in body and color before and after; and yet men wish to take the phoenix seen in Emperor Xuan's time, five feet high and with markings of five colors, as the standard from before by which to reckon what comes after, and to say that a phoenix that ought to come out again will be the same as that one. They are wrong! The phoenix and the qilin that ought to come out and be seen again will surely not be of a kind like those that came out and were seen in the ages before. And yet the scholars of the world say of themselves that they will see them and at once know them. How can that be?
案魯人得,不敢正名,曰「有獐而角者」,時誠無以知也。武帝使謁者終軍議之,終軍曰:「野禽并角,明天下同本也。」
Look: the man of Lu who got the qilin did not dare to name it straight out, but said, "something that is a roe deer and has a horn." At that time there was truly no way to know it. Emperor Wu had the usher Zhong Jun discuss it, and Zhong Jun said, "The wild fowl has joined its horns, which makes clear that all under Heaven are one at the root."
不正名而言野者,終軍亦疑無以審也。當今世儒之知,不能過魯人與終軍,其見鳳皇、騏,必從而疑之非恆之鳥獸耳,何能審其鳳皇、騏乎?
That he did not name it straight out but spoke of a wild fowl means that Zhong Jun too doubted and had no way to make it sure. The knowledge of the scholars of the world today cannot pass that of the man of Lu and of Zhong Jun; when they see a phoenix or a qilin they will surely follow them and doubt whether they are birds and beasts out of the common, and nothing more. How can they make sure that they are the phoenix and the qilin?
以體色言之,未必等;以鳥獸隨從多者,未必善;以希見言之,有鵒來;以相奇言之,聖人有奇骨體,賢者亦有奇骨。聖賢俱奇,人無以別。由賢聖言之,聖鳥、聖獸,亦與恆鳥庸獸俱有奇怪。聖人賢者亦有知而絕殊,骨無異者,聖賢鳥獸亦有仁善廉清,體無奇者。世或有富貴不聖,身有骨為富貴表,不為聖賢驗。然則鳥亦有五采,獸有角而無仁聖者。夫如是,上世所見鳳皇、騏,何知其非恆鳥獸?今之所見鵲、獐之屬,安知非鳳皇、騏也?
Speaking by body and color, they need not be equal; going by many birds and beasts following them, they need not be good; speaking by rareness of sight, there was the coming of the myna; speaking by strangeness of figure, a sage has strange bones and body, and a worthy man too has strange bones. Sage and worthy are both strange, and men have no way to tell them apart. Speaking by worthy and sage: sage birds and sage beasts, like common birds and ordinary beasts, also have what is strange and odd. There are sages and worthy men whose knowledge sets them quite apart and whose bones are nothing unusual; and there are sagely and worthy birds and beasts that are good and kind and clean and pure and have nothing strange in body. In the world there are men rich and noble who are not sages: their bodies have bones that are a sign of wealth and rank but are no proof of sage or worthy. That being so, there are birds too with five colors and beasts with horns that are not good and sagely. If it is so, how does one know that the phoenix and the qilin seen in the ages above were not common birds and beasts? And how does one know that the magpies and roe deer and their sort that are seen now are not the phoenix and the qilin?
方今聖世,堯、舜之主,流布道化,仁聖之物,何為不生?或時以有鳳皇、騏亂於鵠鵲、獐鹿,世人不知。美玉隱在石中,楚王、令尹不能知,故有抱玉泣血之痛。今或時鳳皇、騏以仁聖之性,隱於恆毛庸羽,無一角、五色表之,世人不之知,猶玉在石中也。何用審之?為此論草於永平之初,時來有瑞,其孝明宣惠,眾瑞并至。至元和、章和之際,孝章耀德,天下和洽,嘉瑞奇物,同時俱應,鳳皇、騏,連出重見,盛於五帝之時。此篇已成,故不得載。
In this sage age of the present day, with a ruler like Yao and Shun spreading abroad the Way and its teaching, why should good and sagely creatures not be born? It may at times be that the phoenix and the qilin are mixed in among swans and magpies, roe deer and deer, and men of the world do not know them. Fine jade lay hidden in the stone, and the king of Chu and his prime minister could not know it, and so there was the grief of one who held the jade and wept blood. Now it may at times be that the phoenix and the qilin, with their good and sagely nature, are hidden among common hair and ordinary feathers, with no single horn or five colors to show them, and men of the world do not know them, as the jade was in the stone. By what is it to be made sure? This discussion was drafted in the first years of Yongping, when omens came from time to time, and Emperor Xiaoming spread his kindness and many omens came together. By the season of Yuanhe and Zhanghe, Emperor Xiaozhang made his virtue shine and all under Heaven was in concord; fine omens and strange things answered together at one time, and the phoenix and the qilin came out one after another and were seen again and again, more richly than in the time of the Five Emperors. This chapter was already finished, and so they could not be set down in it.
或問曰:「《講瑞》謂鳳皇、騏難知,世瑞不能別。今孝章之所致鳳皇、騏,不可得知乎?」
Someone asks, "The Jiang rui (講瑞) says that the phoenix and the qilin are hard to know and that the omens of the world cannot be told apart. Can the phoenix and the qilin that Emperor Xiaozhang has brought down not be known either?"
曰:五鳥之記,四方中央,皆有大鳥,其出,眾鳥皆從,小大毛色類鳳皇,實難知也。故夫世瑞不能別,別之如何?以政治。時王之德,不及唐、虞之時,其鳳皇、騏,目不親見。然而唐、虞之瑞必真是者,堯之德明也。孝宣比堯、舜,天下太平,萬里慕化,仁道施行,鳥獸仁者感動而來,瑞物小大、毛色、足翼,必不同類。以政治之得失,主之明暗,准況眾瑞,無非真者。事或難知而易曉,其此之謂也?又以甘露驗之:甘露,和氣所生也,露無故而甘,和氣獨已至矣。和氣至,甘露降,德洽而眾瑞湊。案永平以來,訖於章和,甘露常降,故知眾瑞皆是,而鳳凰、騏皆真也。
The answer: in the record of the five birds, in the four quarters and in the center there are great birds, and when they come out the flocking birds all follow them, and in size and in the color of their hair they are of the phoenix's kind. They are truly hard to know. Therefore the omens of the world cannot be told apart; and how are they to be told apart? By government. The virtue of the king of that day did not come up to the time of Tang and Yu, and his phoenix and qilin were not seen with one's own eyes. And yet the omens of Tang and Yu were surely true ones, because the virtue of Yao was bright. Emperor Xiaoxuan matched Yao and Shun: all under Heaven was at great peace, ten thousand li longed for his teaching, and the way of goodness was spread and carried out; the good among birds and beasts were moved and came, and the size of the omen things, the color of their hair, their feet and wings, were surely not of one kind. Reckoning the many omens by the gains and losses of government and by the brightness or darkness of the ruler, there is none of them that is not true. "A thing may be hard to know and yet easy to understand": is this what that means? Prove it also by the sweet dew. The sweet dew is what the breath of harmony brings forth, and when dew is sweet for no reason, the breath of harmony has already come of itself. When the breath of harmony comes the sweet dew falls, and when virtue is spread abroad the many omens gather. Look: from Yongping down to Zhanghe the sweet dew always fell, and therefore one knows that the many omens are all right, and that the phoenix and the qilin are all true.