Yetgeul › Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) › On Death

Lunsi — On Death論死篇

Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) 論衡 · Wang Chong · About AD 80 · 28 passages · 3,523 Chinese characters · reading time 14.1 min

Lunheng (Discourses Weighed in the Balance) On Death Wang Chong, a man of the Later Han, gave the sense of his book in four characters — hating what is empty and false. He takes up one by one the sayings of his age: that Heaven answers the affairs of men and sends down calamity, that the dead become ghosts and take revenge, that a man must choose his days or come to harm. The grain of his argument is unlike others'. He does not let a saying stand because an elder said it — he questions Confucius, he pricks Mencius, he holds Han Fei wrong. To the saying that Heaven rebukes men and sends calamity he asks back: then why, for one ruler, does Heaven send drought upon a whole country? Nine chapters bearing the word "empty" stand in a row, taking up in turn the marvels written in the old books, and three bearing the word "swollen" deal with how words grow past their size. The chapter on fortune and misfortune has the tale of Dongmyeong of Buyeo, who shot so well with the bow that the king wished to kill him, and who fled south and came to the Yanhu River. It is the earliest form of the Dongmyeong record that survives.

世謂(死)人〔死〕為鬼,有知,能害人。試以物類驗之,(死)人〔死〕不為鬼,無知,不能害人。何以驗之?驗之以物。

The world says that when a man dies he becomes a ghost, that he has knowledge, and that he can harm men. Try proving it by the kinds of things: a man who dies does not become a ghost, he has no knowledge, and he cannot harm men. How is this proved? It is proved by things.

人,物也;物,亦物也。物死不為鬼,人死何故獨能為鬼?世能別人物不能為鬼,則為鬼不為鬼尚難分明;如不能別,則亦無以知其能為鬼也。人之所以生者,精氣也,死而精氣滅,能為精氣者,血脈也,人死血脈竭,竭而精氣滅,滅而形體朽,朽而成灰土,何用為鬼?人無耳目則無所知,故聾盲之人比於草木。夫精氣去人,豈徒與無耳目同哉!朽則消亡,荒忽不見,故謂之鬼神。人見鬼神之形,故非死人之精也。何則?鬼神,荒忽不見之名也。人死精神升天,骸骨歸土,故謂之鬼。鬼者,歸也;神者,荒忽無形者也。

Man is a thing, and a thing is a thing as well. When a thing dies it does not become a ghost; why should a man alone be able to become a ghost when he dies? If the world can tell that men and things cannot become ghosts, then becoming a ghost and not becoming a ghost is still hard to make plain; and if it cannot tell, then there is no way to know that they can become ghosts either. What a man lives by is the essential breath, and when he dies the essential breath is put out. What can make the essential breath is the blood and the vessels, and when a man dies the blood and the vessels run dry; running dry, the essential breath is put out; being put out, the body rots; rotting, it becomes ash and earth. With what, then, does he become a ghost? A man without ears and eyes knows nothing, and so the deaf and the blind are likened to grass and trees. When the essential breath leaves a man, how should that be merely the same as having no ears and eyes! What rots melts away and is gone, and being dim it is not seen, and so it is called ghost and spirit. Men see the shape of ghosts and spirits, and therefore it is not the essence of a dead man. Why so? Ghost and spirit are names for what is dim and not seen. When a man dies his spirit rises to Heaven and his bones go back to the earth, and so he is called gui. Gui is going back; shen is what is dim and without shape.

或說:鬼神,陰陽之名也,陰氣逆物而歸,故謂之鬼;陽氣導物而生,故謂之神。神者,(伸)〔申〕也。申復無已,終而復始。人用神氣生,其死復歸神氣。陰陽稱鬼神,人死亦稱鬼神。氣之生人,猶水之為冰也。水凝為冰,氣凝為人;冰釋為水,人死復神。其名為神也,猶冰釋更名水也。人見名異,則謂有知,能為形而害人,無據以論人也。

Some explain it thus. Ghost and spirit are names for yin and yang. The breath of yin goes against things and returns, and so it is called gui; the breath of yang leads things forth and gives them birth, and so it is called shen. Shen is stretching out. It stretches and stretches again without end, and ends and begins once more. A man lives by using the breath of shen, and at his death he goes back to the breath of shen. Yin and yang are called ghost and spirit, and a man who has died is called ghost and spirit as well. That breath gives birth to a man is like water becoming ice. Water freezes and becomes ice, breath freezes and becomes a man; ice melts and becomes water, a man dies and becomes shen again. That its name is shen is like ice melting and being named water anew. Men see that the names differ, and then they say that it has knowledge and can take shape and harm men; but this is to discuss man with no ground for it.

人見鬼若生人之形,以其見若生人之形,故知非死人之精也。何以效之?以囊橐盈粟米,米在囊中,若粟在橐中,滿盈堅強,立樹可見。人瞻望之,則知其為粟米囊橐。何則?囊橐之形,若其容可察也。如囊穿米出,橐敗粟棄,則囊橐委辟,人瞻望之,弗復見矣。人之精神藏於形體之內,猶粟米在囊橐之中也。死而形體朽,精氣散,猶囊橐穿敗,粟米棄出也。粟米棄出,囊橐無復有形,精氣散亡,何能復有體而人得見之乎?禽獸之死也,其肉盡索,皮毛尚在,制以為裘,人望見之似禽獸之形。故世有衣狗裘為狗盜者,人不覺知,假狗之皮毛,故人不意疑也。今人死,皮毛朽敗,雖精氣尚在,神安能復假此形而以行見乎?夫死人不能假生人之形以見,猶生人不能假死人之魂以亡矣。六畜能變化象人之形者,其形尚生,精氣尚在也。如死,其形腐朽,雖虎兕勇悍,不能復化。魯公牛哀病化為虎,亦以未死也。世有以生形轉為生類者矣,未有以死身化為生象者也。

Men see a ghost as though in the shape of a living man, and because they see it as though in the shape of a living man we know that it is not the essence of a dead man. How is this shown? By filling a bag and a sack with grain and rice. When rice is in the bag and grain is in the sack, full and firm and strong, they can be stood up and seen. When a man looks at them from afar he knows that they are bags and sacks of grain and rice. Why so? Because the shape of the bag and the sack is such that what they hold can be made out. But if the bag is pierced and the rice comes out, and the sack gives way and the grain is spilled, then the bag and the sack hang limp, and though a man look at them from afar he sees them no more. That a man's spirit is stored within his body is like grain and rice being inside a bag and a sack. That at death the body rots and the essential breath scatters is like the bag and the sack being pierced and giving way and the grain and rice being spilled out. When the grain and rice are spilled out the bag and the sack have no shape any more; and when the essential breath is scattered and gone, how can there be a body again for men to see? When a bird or a beast dies its flesh is all used up, but its hide and hair are still there, and made up into a fur coat, so that men looking at it see something like the shape of a bird or a beast. And so the world has had men who put on a dog's fur coat and played the dog thief, and men did not notice; they borrowed the hide and hair of a dog, and so men did not think to doubt them. Now when a man dies and his hide and hair rot and give way, then though his essential breath were still there, how could his spirit borrow this shape again and walk about and be seen? That a dead man cannot borrow the shape of a living man to be seen is like a living man not being able to borrow the soul of a dead man to vanish. That the six kinds of beasts can change and take the shape of a man is because their shape is still alive and their essential breath is still there. If they die their shape rots away, and though they were as bold as tiger and rhinoceros they cannot change again. That Gongniu Ai of Lu fell sick and changed into a tiger was also because he was not yet dead. The world has had those who turned from a living shape into a living kind, but there has never been one who changed from a dead body into a living likeness.

天地開辟,人皇以來,隨壽而死。若中年夭亡,以億萬數。

Since Heaven and earth were opened out, and since the Human Sovereign, men have died as their span ran out. Those who died young in their middle years are counted by the hundred million.

計今人之數不若死者多,如人死輒為鬼,則道路之上,一步一鬼也。人且死見鬼,宜見數百千萬,滿堂盈廷,填塞巷路,不宜徒見一兩人也。人之兵死也,世言其血為磷。血者,生時之精氣也。人夜行見磷,不象人形,渾沌積聚,若火光之狀。磷,死人之血也,其形不類生人之血。〔鬼,死人之形〕也,其形不類生人之形。精氣去人,何故象人之體?人見鬼也皆象死人形,則可疑死人為鬼或反象生人之形。病者見鬼,云甲來。甲時不死,氣象甲形。如死人為鬼,病者何故見生人之體乎?

Reckon the number of men now living and it is not so many as the dead; and if a man became a ghost as soon as he died, then upon the roads there would be a ghost at every step. A man about to die who sees ghosts ought to see hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands, filling the hall and crowding the courtyard and blocking up the lanes and the roads, and not merely see one man or two. When a man dies by the weapon, the world says that his blood becomes goblin fire. Blood is the essential breath of the time when he was alive. A man walking at night who sees goblin fire sees that it does not take the shape of a man, but is heaped up in confusion, like the look of firelight. Goblin fire is the blood of a dead man, and its shape is not like the blood of a living man. A ghost is the shape of a dead man, and its shape is not like the shape of a living man. When the essential breath leaves a man, for what reason should it take the likeness of a man's body? If what men see as ghosts all took the shape of dead men, then one might well suppose that dead men become ghosts; yet at times they take the shape of living men instead. A sick man sees a ghost and says that Jia is coming. Jia was not dead at that time, and the breath had taken the likeness of Jia's shape. If dead men became ghosts, for what reason does a sick man see the body of a living man?

天地之性,能更生火,不能使滅火復燃;能更生人,不能令死人復見。能使灰更為燃火,吾乃頗疑死人能復為形。案火滅不能復燃以況之,死人不能復為鬼,明矣。夫為鬼者,人謂死人之精神。如審鬼者死人之精神,則人見之宜徒見裸袒之形,無為見衣帶被服也。何則?衣服無精神,人死與形體俱朽,何以得貫穿之乎?

It is the nature of Heaven and earth that it can make fire anew but cannot make a fire that is out burn again; it can make men anew but cannot make a dead man be seen again. Could it make ashes into burning fire once more, then I should indeed rather doubt whether a dead man can take shape again. Weigh it by this, that a fire gone out cannot burn again, and it is plain that a dead man cannot become a ghost. Now what becomes a ghost, men call the spirit of a dead man. If in truth the ghost were the spirit of a dead man, then when men saw it they ought to see only a naked and bare shape, and there would be no seeing clothes and a girdle and garments worn. Why so? Clothes have no spirit, and when a man dies they rot along with his body. With what, then, could he put them on?

精神本以血氣為主,血氣常附形體。形體雖朽,精神尚在,能為鬼可也。今衣服,絲絮布帛也,生時血氣不附著,而亦自無血氣,敗朽遂已,與形體等,安能自若為衣服之形?由此言之,見鬼衣服象(之)〔人〕,則形體亦象(之)〔人〕矣。象(之)〔人〕,則知非死人之精神也。

The spirit has blood and breath for its master, and blood and breath always cling to the body. Though the body rot, the spirit is still there, and to say that it can become a ghost is allowable. But clothes are silk and wadding and cloth and hemp: while he lived, blood and breath did not cling to them, and of themselves they have no blood and breath, so that when they wear out and rot that is the end of them, the same as with the body. How could they stay as they were and be the shape of clothes? Speaking from this, if the clothes of a ghost that is seen take the likeness of a man, then the body takes the likeness of a man too; and if it takes the likeness of a man, we know that it is not the spirit of a dead man.

夫死人不能為鬼,則亦無所知矣。何以驗之?以未生之時無所知也。人未生,在元氣之中;既死,復歸元氣。元氣荒忽,人氣在其中。人未生,無所知,其死,歸無知之本,何能有知乎?人之所以聰明智惠者,以含五常之氣也;五常之氣所以在人者,以五藏在形中也。五藏不傷,則人智惠;五藏有病,則人荒忽。荒忽則愚痴矣。人死,五藏腐朽,腐朽則五常無所托矣,所用藏智者已敗矣,所用為智者已去矣。形須氣而成,氣須形而知。天下無獨燃之火,世間安得有無體獨知之精?

Now if a dead man cannot become a ghost, then he knows nothing either. How is this proved? By his knowing nothing in the time before he was born. Before a man is born he is within the primal breath; once dead, he goes back to the primal breath. The primal breath is dim, and the breath of man is within it. Before a man is born he knows nothing, and at his death he goes back to the root where there is no knowing. How could he have knowledge? The reason a man is keen of ear and eye and wise is that he holds in him the breath of the five constants; and the reason the breath of the five constants is in a man is that the five organs are within his body. If the five organs are unhurt the man is wise; if the five organs are sick the man is dim; and being dim, he is a fool. When a man dies the five organs rot, and when they rot the five constants have nothing to lodge in: what was used to store wisdom has already given way, and what was used to make wisdom has already left. Shape waits upon breath to be made, and breath waits upon shape to know. In all the world there is no fire that burns alone; how should the world have an essence that knows alone, with no body?

人之死也,其猶夢也;夢者,殄之次也;殄者,死之比也。人殄不悟,則死矣。案人殄復悟,死(從)〔復〕來者,與夢相似。然則夢、殄、死,一實也。人夢不能知覺時所作,猶死不能識生時所為矣。人言談有所作於臥人之旁,臥人不能知,猶對死人之棺為善惡之事,死人不能復知也。夫臥,精氣尚在,形體尚全,猶無所知,況死人精神消亡,形體朽敗乎!

A man's death is like his dreaming. Dreaming is next to swooning, and swooning is the like of death. When a man swoons and does not wake, he is dead. Weigh it thus: that a man swoons and wakes again and comes back from death is much like a dream. Then dreaming and swooning and death are one and the same thing. That a man in a dream cannot know what was done while he was awake is like a dead man not being able to know what he did while he was alive. That men talk and do things beside a sleeping man and the sleeping man cannot know it is like doing good and evil deeds before a dead man's coffin and the dead man not being able to know it again. Now in sleep the essential breath is still there and the body is still whole, and yet nothing is known. How much more when a dead man's spirit has melted away and gone and his body has rotted and given way!

人為人所毆傷,詣吏告苦以語人,有知之故也。或為人所殺,則不知何人殺也,或家不知其尸所在。使死人有知,必恚人之殺己也,當能言於吏旁,告以賊主名,若能歸語其家,告以尸之所在。今則不能,無知之效也。世間死者,(今)〔令〕生人殄而用其言,用巫叩元弦下死人魂,因巫口談,皆夸誕之言也。知不夸誕,物之精神為之象也。或曰:「不能言也。」

When a man is beaten and hurt by another he goes to the officers to tell his suffering and speaks of it to men, and this is because he has knowledge. Sometimes a man is killed by another and it is not known who killed him, and sometimes his household does not know where his corpse is. If a dead man had knowledge he would surely rage that a man had killed him, and he ought to be able to speak beside the officer and tell him the name of the robber's chief, or else to go home and speak to his household and tell them where his corpse is. Now he cannot, and this is the proof that he has no knowledge. In the world the dead make a living man swoon and use his words, and the shaman beats the strings and brings down the soul of a dead man and speaks through the shaman's mouth; and all of this is boasting and wild talk. Know that it is not boasting and wild, and then it is the spirit of a thing that has taken that likeness. Some say, "He cannot speak."

夫〔曰〕不能言,則亦不能知矣。知用氣,言亦用氣焉。人之未死也,智惠精神定矣,病則亂,精神擾也。夫死,病之甚者也。病,死之微,猶亂,況其甚乎!精神擾,自無所知,況其散也!

Now if it is said that he cannot speak, then he cannot know either. Knowing uses breath, and speaking uses breath as well. Before a man dies his wisdom and his spirit are settled; when he is sick they are disordered, for the spirit is shaken. Now death is the worst of sickness. Sickness is the slight form of death, and still there is disorder in it; how much more in the worst of it! When the spirit is shaken, of itself it knows nothing; how much more when it is scattered!

人之死,猶火之滅也。火滅而耀不照,人死而知不惠,二者宜同一實。論者猶謂死有知,惑也。人病且死,與火之且滅何以異?火滅光消而燭在,人死精亡而形存,謂人死有知,是謂火滅復有光也。隆冬之月,寒氣用事,水凝為冰,逾春氣溫,冰釋為水。人生於天地之間,其猶冰也。陰陽之氣,凝而為人,年終壽盡,死還為氣。夫春水不能復為冰,死魂安能復為形?

A man's death is like a fire going out. When a fire goes out its glow does not shine, and when a man dies his knowing is not wise; the two ought to be one and the same thing. That those who discuss it still say the dead have knowledge is a delusion. When a man is sick and about to die, wherein does it differ from a fire about to go out? When a fire goes out its light melts away and the candle remains; when a man dies his essence is gone and his shape is left. To say that a dead man has knowledge is to say that a fire has gone out and there is light again. In the months of deep winter the cold breath has charge of affairs, and water freezes and becomes ice; and when spring is past and the breath is warm, the ice melts and becomes water. A man born between Heaven and earth is like ice. The breath of yin and yang freezes and becomes a man, and when his years end and his span is done he dies and turns back into breath. Now spring water cannot become ice again; how should a dead soul become shape again?

妒夫娼妻,同室而處,淫亂失行,忿怒斗訟,夫死妻更嫁,妻死無更娶。以有知驗之,宜大忿怒。今夫妻死者寂寞無聲,更嫁娶者平忽無禍,無知之驗也。

A jealous husband and a wanton wife dwell in one room, and in their wantonness they lose all conduct, and rage and quarrel and go to law; and when the husband dies the wife marries again, and when the wife dies the man takes another. Prove it by their having knowledge, and they ought to rage greatly. Now the husband and the wife who have died are silent and without a sound, and those who marry again live at ease and meet no harm. This is the proof that there is no knowledge.

Interlinear notes 1

妻死無更娶

The source text has 妻死無更娶, but what follows speaks of both the remarried wife and the remarried husband, so 無 is read as an error for 夫: "when the wife dies the husband takes another." ― translator

孔子葬母於防,既而雨甚至,防墓崩。孔子聞之,泫然流涕曰:「古者不修墓。」

Confucius buried his mother at Fang, and after that the rain came down hard and the grave at Fang fell in. When Confucius heard of it he wept streaming tears and said, "In ancient times they did not mend graves."

遂不復修。使死有知,必恚人不修也。孔子知之,宜輒修墓,以喜魂神。然而不修,聖人明審,曉其無知也。

And in the end he did not mend it again. If the dead had knowledge he would surely rage that men did not mend it. Had Confucius known this, he ought to have mended the grave at once, to gladden the soul and the spirit. Yet he did not mend it, for the sage saw clearly and knew that the dead have no knowledge.

枯骨在野,時鳴呼有聲,若夜聞哭聲,謂之死人音,非也。何以驗之?生人所以言語吁呼者,氣括口喉之中,動搖其舌,張歙其口,故能成言。譬猶吹簫笙,簫笙折破,氣越不括,手無所弄,則不成音。夫簫笙之管,猶人之口喉也;手弄其孔,猶人之動舌也。人死口喉腐敗,舌不復動,何能成言!然而枯骨時呻鳴者,人骨自有能呻鳴者焉,或以為秋〔氣〕也,是與夜鬼哭無以異也。秋氣為呻鳴之變,自有所為,依倚死骨之側,人則謂之骨尚有知,呻鳴於野。草澤暴體以千萬數,呻鳴之聲,家步屬焉。

Dry bones lie in the fields and at times there is a sound of crying out from them, and when men hear a sound of weeping at night they call it the voice of the dead; but this is wrong. How is it proved? The reason living men speak and cry out is that the breath is held fast within the mouth and the throat and shakes the tongue and opens and closes the mouth, and so words can be made. It is like blowing a flute or a reed pipe: if the flute and the pipe are broken and split, the breath passes over and is not held fast, and the hand has nothing to play upon, and so no sound is made. The tube of the flute and the pipe is like a man's mouth and throat, and the hand playing upon its holes is like a man moving his tongue. When a man dies and his mouth and throat rot and give way and his tongue moves no more, how can words be made! Yet that dry bones at times groan and cry is because there are among the bones of men those that can groan and cry of themselves; and some take it for the breath of autumn, and in this there is nothing to set it apart from the weeping of ghosts at night. The breath of autumn makes a strange thing of groaning and crying, and does so of itself, leaning at the side of dead bones; and men then say that the bones still have knowledge and groan and cry in the fields. Bodies laid bare in the grass and the marshes are counted by the thousand and the ten thousand, and the sound of groaning and crying would follow at every house and every step.

夫有能使不言者言,未有言者死能復使之言,言者亦不能復使之言。猶物生以青為(氣)〔色〕,或予之也,物死青者去,或奪之也。予之物青,奪之青去,去後不能復予之青,物亦不能復自青。聲色俱通,并稟於天,青青之色,猶梟梟之聲也。死物之色不能復青,獨為死人之聲能復自言,惑也。

Now there are those who can make one who does not speak speak, but there has never been one who could make a man who spoke and then died speak again; nor can one who speaks be made to speak again. It is like a thing that is born taking green for its color, which is as though it were given to it; and when the thing dies the green leaves it, which is as though it were taken away. Give it, and the thing is green; take it away, and the green leaves; and once it has left, the green cannot be given it again, nor can the thing be green again of itself. Sound and color both run through in the same way, and both are received from Heaven, and the green upon green of a color is like the full and thick of a sound. The color of a dead thing cannot be green again; that the voice of a dead man alone can speak again of itself is a delusion.

人之所以能言語者,以有氣力也,氣力之盛,以能飲食也。飲食損減則氣力衰,衰則聲音嘶,困不能食,則口不能復言。夫死,困之甚,何能復言?或曰:「死人歆肴食氣,故能言。」

The reason a man can speak is that he has strength of breath, and the fullness of his strength of breath is that he can eat and drink. When eating and drinking are cut down the strength of breath weakens; weakening, the voice grows hoarse; and when he is worn out and cannot eat, his mouth can speak no more. Now death is the worst of being worn out; how can he speak again? Some say, "A dead man savors the breath of the meats and the food, and so he can speak."

夫死人之精,生人之精也。使生人不飲食,而徒以口歆肴食〔之〕氣,不過三日則餓死矣。

Now the essence of a dead man is the essence of a living man. Let a living man not eat and drink but only savor the breath of the meats and the food with his mouth, and in not more than three days he starves to death.

或曰:「死人之精,神於生人之精,故能歆氣為音。」

Some say, "The essence of a dead man is more spirit-like than the essence of a living man, and so it can savor breath and make a sound."

夫生人之精在於身中,死則在於身外,死之與生何以殊?身中身外何以異?取水實於大盎中,盎破水流地,地水能異於盎中之水乎?地水不異於盎中之水,身外之精,何故殊於身中之精?

Now the essence of a living man is within his body, and when he dies it is outside his body. Wherein do death and life differ, and wherein does within the body differ from outside it? Take water and fill a great basin with it, and let the basin break and the water run upon the ground: can the water on the ground differ from the water in the basin? If the water on the ground does not differ from the water in the basin, for what reason should the essence outside the body differ from the essence within the body?

人死不為鬼,無知,不能語言,則不能害人矣。何以驗之?夫人之怒也用氣,其害人用力,用力須筋骨而強,強則能害人。忿怒之人,呼於人之旁,口氣喘射人之面,雖勇如賁、育,氣不害人,使舒手而擊,舉足而蹶,則所擊蹶無不破折。夫死,骨朽筋力絕,手足不舉,雖精氣尚在,猶吁之時無嗣助也,何以能害人也?凡人與物所以能害人者,手臂把刃,爪牙堅利之故也。今人死,手臂朽敗,不能復持刃,爪牙墮落,不能復嚙噬,安能害人?兒之始生也,手足具成,手不能搏,足不能蹶者,氣適凝成,未能堅強也。由此言之,精氣不能堅強,審矣。氣為形體,形體微弱,猶未能害人,況死,氣去精神絕。微弱猶未能害人,寒骨謂能害人者邪?死人之氣不去邪,何能害人!

If a man who dies does not become a ghost, has no knowledge, and cannot speak, then he cannot harm men. How is this proved? Now a man uses breath in his rage and uses strength in harming men; and using strength, he waits upon sinew and bone to be strong, and being strong he can harm men. A raging man cries out beside another and pants the breath of his mouth into the other's face; but though he were as bold as Ben and Yu, breath does not harm men. Let him stretch out his hand and strike, and lift his foot and kick, and what he strikes and kicks is never unbroken. Now when a man dies his bones rot and the strength of his sinews is cut off, and he cannot lift hand or foot; so that though his essential breath were still there, it is like the time of crying out, when there is nothing to follow up and help. With what, then, can he harm men? What makes men and things able to harm men is that hand and arm grip a blade and that claw and tooth are hard and sharp. Now when a man dies his hand and arm rot and give way and can hold a blade no more, and his claws and teeth fall out and can bite and gnaw no more. How could he harm men? When a child is first born its hands and feet are complete; that its hand cannot strike and its foot cannot kick is because the breath has only just frozen into shape and is not yet hard and strong. Speaking from this, it is plain that the essential breath cannot be hard and strong. Breath becomes a body, and while the body is faint and weak it still cannot harm men; how much more in death, when the breath has left and the spirit is cut off. If the faint and weak still cannot harm men, shall cold bones be said to harm men? And if the breath of a dead man has not left him, how could it harm men!

雞卵之未字也,溶於彀中,潰而視之,若水之形;良雌傴伏,體方就成,就成之後,能啄蹶之。夫人之死猶溶之時,溶之氣,安能害人?人之所以勇猛能害人者,以飲食也,飲食飽足則強壯勇猛,強壯勇猛則能害人矣。人病不能飲食,則身(嬴)〔羸〕弱,(嬴)〔羸〕弱困甚,故至於死。病困之時,仇在其旁,不能咄叱,人盜其物,不能禁奪,羸弱困劣之故也。夫死,羸弱困劣之甚者也,何能害人?有雞太之畜,為人所盜竊,雖怯無勢之人,莫不忿怒,忿怒之極,至相賊滅。敗亂之時,人相啖食者,使其神有知,宜能害人。身貴於雞犬,己死重於見盜,忿怒於雞犬,無怨於食己,不能害人之驗也。蟬之未蛻也為復育,已蛻也去復育之體,更為蟬之形。使死人精神去形體,若蟬之去復育乎!則夫為蟬者不能害為復育者。夫蟬不能害復育,死人之精神,何能害生人之身?夢者之義疑。(惑)〔或〕言夢者精神自止身中,為吉凶之象;或言精神行與人物相更。今其審止身中,死之精神亦將復然。今其審行,人夢殺傷人,夢殺傷人若為人所復殺,明日視彼之身,察己之體,無兵刃創傷之驗。夫夢用精神,精神,死之精神也。

Before a hen's egg is hatched it is dissolved within the shell, and break it and look, and it is like the shape of water. When a good hen broods and crouches upon it the body is then made complete, and after it is made complete it can peck and kick. Now a man's death is like the time of being dissolved; and how should a dissolved breath harm men? The reason a man is bold and fierce and can harm men is his eating and drinking; when his eating and drinking are full and enough he is strong and sturdy and bold and fierce, and being strong and sturdy and bold and fierce he can harm men. When a man is sick and cannot eat and drink his body is lean and weak, and being lean and weak his wretchedness is deep, and so he comes to death. In the time of sickness and wretchedness, though his enemy be at his side he cannot scold him, and though a man steal his goods he cannot forbid it and take them back; and this is because he is lean and weak and wretched and poor. Now death is the worst of being lean and weak and wretched and poor; how could it harm men? A man has chickens and dogs among his stock, and when they are stolen by another, even a man who is timid and without power is never without rage, and at the height of his rage it comes to killing and destroying one another. In times of defeat and disorder men eat one another; and if their spirits had knowledge they ought to be able to harm men. The body is more precious than chickens and dogs, and one's own death weighs more than being robbed; yet there is rage over chickens and dogs and no grudge against the one who ate him. This is the proof that he cannot harm men. Before a cicada sheds its skin it is a fuyu, and once it has shed it leaves the body of the fuyu and becomes the shape of a cicada instead. Is a dead man's spirit leaving his body like a cicada leaving the fuyu! Then what has become a cicada cannot harm what has become a fuyu. Now if a cicada cannot harm a fuyu, how can the spirit of a dead man harm the body of a living man? The meaning of dreams is in doubt. Some say that in a dream the spirit stays of itself within the body and makes likenesses of good and ill fortune; some say that the spirit goes abroad and changes places with men and things. Now if it truly stays within the body, the spirit of the dead will do the same again. And if it truly goes abroad, a man dreams that he kills and wounds a man, and though in dreaming that he kills and wounds a man he be killed again by another, yet the next day he looks at that man's body and examines his own body, and there is no proof of a wound from weapon or blade. Now dreaming uses the spirit, and the spirit is the spirit of death.

夢之精神不能害人,死之精神安能為害?火熾而釜拂,沸止而氣歇,以火為主也。精神之怒也,乃能害人,不怒不能害人。火猛灶中,釜涌氣蒸;精怒胸中,力盛身熱。今人之將死,身體清涼,涼益清甚,遂以死亡。當死之時,精神不怒。身亡之後,猶湯之離釜也,安能害人?

If the spirit of dreaming cannot harm men, how should the spirit of death be able to do harm? When the fire is blazing the kettle boils over, and when the boiling stops the breath dies down, for the fire is its master. When the spirit rages, then it can harm men; when it does not rage it cannot harm men. When the fire is fierce in the stove the kettle seethes and the breath steams; when the essence rages within the breast the strength is full and the body is hot. Now when a man is about to die his body is cool and chill, and the chill grows cooler and deeper, and so at last he dies and is gone. At the time of dying the spirit does not rage. And after the body is gone it is like boiling water leaving the kettle; how should it harm men?

物與人通。人有痴狂之病,如知其物然而理之,病則愈矣。夫物未死,精神依倚形體,故能變化,與人交通;已死,形體坏爛,精神散亡,無所復依,不能變化。夫人之精神猶物之精神也。物生,精神為病;其死,精神消亡。人與物同,死而精神亦滅,安能為害禍!設謂人貴,精神有異,成事,物能變化,人則不能。是反人精神不若物,物精〔神〕奇於人也。

Things run through with men. When a man has the sickness of madness, if the thing behind it is known and put in order the sickness is healed. Now while a thing is not yet dead its spirit leans upon its body, and so it can change and have dealings with men; once it is dead its body falls in and rots and its spirit scatters and is gone, and having nothing to lean upon any more it cannot change. Now a man's spirit is like the spirit of a thing. While the thing lives its spirit makes sickness; at its death its spirit melts away and is gone. Men and things are the same, and when they die their spirit is put out as well; how should it be able to work harm and calamity! Suppose it be said that man is precious and that his spirit has something different in it: in the affairs that come about, a thing can change and a man cannot. This would be to make a man's spirit less than a thing's after all, and the spirit of a thing more wonderful than a man's.

水火燒溺。凡能害人者,皆五行之物。金傷人,木毆人,土壓人,水溺人,火燒人。使人死,精神為五行之物乎?害人;不為乎?不能害人。不為物,則為氣矣。氣之害人者,太陽之氣為毒者也。使人死,其氣為毒乎?害人;不為乎?不能害人。

Water and fire burn and drown. All that can harm men are things of the five elements. Metal wounds men, wood strikes men, earth presses men, water drowns men, fire burns men. When a man dies, does his spirit become a thing of the five elements? Then it harms men. Does it not? Then it cannot harm men. If it does not become a thing, then it becomes breath. What harms men among breaths is the breath of the great yang when it becomes poison. When a man dies, does his breath become poison? Then it harms men. Does it not? Then it cannot harm men.

夫論死不為鬼,無知,不能害人。則夫所見鬼者,非死人之精;其害人者,非其精所為,明矣。

Thus it has been argued that a man who dies does not become a ghost, has no knowledge, and cannot harm men. Then it is plain that the ghosts that are seen are not the essence of dead men, and that what harms men is not the work of their essence.