Yetgeul › Wujing Qishu (The Seven Military Classics) — the six besides the Sunzi › Questions and Replies of Li Weigong

Questions and Replies with Li Weigong — Lower Book唐李問對 卷下

Wujing Qishu (The Seven Military Classics) — the six besides the Sunzi 武經七書 · Ascribed to Jiang Taigong · ascribed to Huang Shigong · Wei Liao · Wu Qi · Sima Rangju · Li Jing · Warring States to Tang (4th century BC to 7th century AD) · 15 passages · 3,029 Chinese characters · reading time 12.1 min

Wujing Qishu (The Seven Military Classics) — the six besides the Sunzi Questions and Replies of Li Weigong The six that remain when the Art of War of Sunzi is taken out of the seven military books the Song set as the texts for examining military officers. The Six Secret Teachings is sixty chapters of questions and answers in which King Wen and King Wu ask Taigong Wang, running from the governing of a state to chariots, cavalry, battle in the open and the crossing of water; the Three Strategies is three short books said to have been given to Zhang Liang by Huang Shigong; the Wei Liaozi is twenty-four chapters setting down in detail the military orders and the squads of five and ten around the time of Qin; the Wuzi is six chapters of Wu Qi's answers to Marquis Wu of Wei; the Methods of the Sima is five chapters handing down the military rites of before the Spring and Autumn period; and Questions and Replies with Li Weigong is three books in which Taizong of Tang and Li Jing go back and forth over the unorthodox and the orthodox, the empty and the full, the frontier peoples and the Han, and attack and defense. "Arms are an instrument of ill omen," "bring the enemy to you and do not be brought to him," and "a thousand chapters and ten thousand phrases do not go beyond that one phrase" all come from here. The remaining six streams of the military school, read after the Art of War, are gathered in one place.

1Mounds and old walled towns — the taboos of yin and yang are only human affairs

太宗曰:「太公云:『以步兵與車騎戰者,必依丘墓、險阻。』,又《孫子》云:『天隙之地,丘墓、故城,兵不可處。』,如何?」 靖曰:「用眾在乎心一,心一在乎禁祥去疑。儻主將有所疑忌,則羣情搖;羣情搖,則敵乘釁而至矣。故安營據地,便乎人事而已。若澗、井、陷、隙之地,及如牢羅之處,人事不便者也。故兵家引而避之,防敵乘我。丘墓故城,非絕險處,我得之為利,豈宜反去之乎?太公所說,兵之至要也。」 太宗曰:「朕思凶器無甚於兵者,行兵苟便於人事,豈以避忌為疑?今後,諸將有以陰陽拘忌、失於事宜者,卿當丁寧誡之。」 靖再拜謝曰:「臣按《尉繚子》云:『黃帝以德守之,以刑伐之,是謂刑德。非天官、時日之謂也。』,然詭道可使由之,不可使知之。後世庸將,泥於術數,是以多敗,不可不誡也。陛下聖訓,臣即宣告諸將。」

Taizong said, "Taigong said, 'One who fights chariots and cavalry with foot soldiers must rely on graves and mounds and on rugged ground.' But the Sunzi says, 'The land of heaven's crevices, graves and mounds and old walled towns — troops cannot stay there.' How is this?" Li Jing said, "Using the host lies in oneness of heart, and oneness of heart lies in forbidding omens and putting away doubt. If the commanding general has something he shuns, the feelings of the many waver; and when the feelings of the many waver, the enemy takes the opening and comes. Therefore settling the camp and relying on the ground is only to make things easy for human affairs. Ravines, wells, pits and crevice ground, and places like a pen or a net, are what is not easy for human affairs, so the military houses lead the army away and avoid them, to keep the enemy from taking us. Graves and old walled towns are not utterly rugged places. If we get them it is to our profit, so why should we instead give them up? What Taigong said is the very heart of war." Taizong said, "I think no baleful instrument is worse than arms. If in waging war a thing is truly easy for human affairs, why doubt it for the sake of shunning and taboo? From now on, if any of the generals loses what is fitting through the bonds of yin and yang, you are to warn him earnestly." Li Jing bowed twice and gave thanks, saying, "Your servant has looked into the Wei Liaozi, which says, 'The Yellow Emperor guarded by virtue and struck by punishment. This is called punishment and virtue. It does not mean the offices of heaven and the choosing of days.' Yet with a way of deceit the people can be made to follow it but cannot be made to know it. Common generals of later ages sink into arts and numbers, and so they are often beaten. One cannot fail to warn against it. Your Majesty's sage teaching your servant will at once make known to the generals."

2Dividing and gathering — Fu Jian at the Fei River and Wu Han in Shu

太宗曰:「兵有分有聚,各貴適宜。前代事迹,孰為善此者?」 靖曰:「苻堅總百萬之眾,而敗於淝水,此兵能合而不能分之所致也。吳漢討公孫述,與副將劉尚分屯,相去二十里,述來攻漢,尚出合擊,大破之,此兵分而能合之所致也。太公云:『分不分,為縻軍;聚不聚,為孤旅。』」 太宗曰:「然。苻堅初得王猛,實知兵,遂取中原。及猛卒,堅果敗,此縻軍之謂乎?吳漢為光武所任,兵不遙制,故漢果平蜀,此不陷孤旅之謂乎?得失事迹,足為萬代鑑。」

Taizong said, "In war there is dividing and there is gathering, and each is prized when it is fitting. Among the deeds of former ages, who was good at this?" Li Jing said, "Fu Jian led a host of a million and was beaten at the Fei River. This came of troops that could join but could not divide. Wu Han attacked Gongsun Shu and camped apart from his deputy general Liu Shang, twenty li between them. When Shu came to attack Han, Shang came out and they struck together and broke him utterly. This came of troops that divided and could still join. Taigong said, 'What should be divided and is not divided makes a tethered army; what should be gathered and is not gathered makes a lone force.'" Taizong said, "So it is. When Fu Jian first got Wang Meng, he truly knew war, and so he took the Central Plain. When Meng died, Jian was indeed beaten. Is this what is meant by a tethered army? Wu Han was trusted by Emperor Guangwu, who did not command his troops from afar, and so Han did pacify Shu. Is this what is meant by not falling into a lone force? The traces of gain and loss are enough to be a mirror for ten thousand ages."

3"Mislead him in many ways" — this one line

太宗曰:「朕觀千章萬句,不出乎『多方以誤之』一句而已。」 靖良久曰:「誠如聖語。大凡用兵,若敵人不誤,則我師安能克哉?譬如奕棊,兩敵均焉,一著或失,竟莫能救。是古今勝敗,率由一誤而已,況多失者乎!」

Taizong said, "I have looked at a thousand chapters and ten thousand lines, and they do not go beyond the one line, 'mislead him in many ways.'" After a long while Li Jing said, "It is truly as Your Majesty says. In using troops at all, if the enemy does not go wrong, how can our army win? It is like a game of go. The two sides are even, and if one stone is misplaced, in the end there is no saving it. Victory and defeat, in old times and now, come mostly from a single mistake. How much more for one who loses many times over."

4Attack and defense are one method — show him too little, show him more than enough

太宗曰:「攻守二事,其實一法歟?《孫子》言:『善攻者,敵不知其所守;善守者,敵不知其所攻。』即不言敵來攻我,我亦攻之;我若自守,敵亦守之。攻守兩齊,其術奈何?」 靖曰:「前代似此相攻相守者,多矣。皆曰:『守則不足,攻則有餘。』便謂不足為弱,有餘為強,蓋不悟攻守之法也。臣案《孫子》云:『不可勝者,守也;可勝者,攻也。』謂敵未可勝,則我且自守;待敵可勝,則攻之爾;非以強弱為辭也。後人不曉其義,則當攻而守,當守而攻。二役既殊,故不能一其法。」 太宗曰:「信乎!有餘不足,使後人惑其強弱。殊不知守之法,要在示敵以不足;攻之法,要在示敵以有餘也。示敵以不足,則敵必來攻,此是敵不知其所攻者也;示敵以有餘,則敵必自守,此是敵不知其所守者也。攻守一決,敵與我分為二事。若我事得,則敵事敗;敵事得,則我事敗。得失成敗,彼我之事分焉。攻守者,一而已矣;得一者,百戰百勝。故曰:『知彼知己,百戰不殆。』其知一之謂乎?」 靖再拜曰:「深乎!聖人之法也。攻是守之機,守是攻之策,同歸乎勝而已矣。若攻不知守,守不知攻,不唯二其事,抑又二其官;雖口誦孫、吳,而心不思妙攻守兩齊之說,其孰能知其然哉?」

Taizong said, "Attack and defense, these two things, are they in truth one method? The Sunzi says, 'One who attacks well — the enemy does not know what to defend; one who defends well — the enemy does not know what to attack.' It does not say that when the enemy comes to attack me I also attack him, and that when I defend myself the enemy also defends. When attack and defense are both alike, what is the art of it?" Li Jing said, "In former ages there were many such cases of attacking each other and defending against each other. All of them said, 'Defend and you have too little; attack and you have more than enough,' and so they called too little weakness and more than enough strength. This is to miss the method of attack and defense. Your servant has looked into the Sunzi, which says, 'What cannot be beaten is defense; what can beat is attack.' It means that while the enemy cannot yet be beaten I keep to my own defense, and that I wait until the enemy can be beaten and then attack him. It does not speak in terms of strong and weak. Later men did not understand its sense, and so they defend when they should attack and attack when they should defend. The two tasks being already different, they cannot make the method one." Taizong said, "Truly so. More than enough and too little have made later men confused about strong and weak. They have not at all understood that the method of defense lies in showing the enemy too little, and the method of attack lies in showing the enemy more than enough. Show the enemy too little and the enemy will surely come to attack, and this is the enemy not knowing what to attack. Show the enemy more than enough and the enemy will surely defend himself, and this is the enemy not knowing what to defend. Attack and defense are decided at one stroke, yet the enemy and I are divided into two tasks. If my task succeeds, the enemy's task fails; if the enemy's task succeeds, my task fails. Gain and loss, success and failure, are divided between his side and mine. Attack and defense are one and one only, and he who gets the one wins a hundred battles out of a hundred. Therefore it is said, 'Know him and know yourself, and in a hundred battles you will not be in danger.' Is this what it means to know the one?" Li Jing bowed twice and said, "How deep it is, the method of the sage. Attack is the trigger of defense and defense is the plan of attack, and both come home to victory and nothing else. If in attacking a man does not know defense, and in defending does not know attack, he not only makes two of the task, he also makes two of the office. Though his mouth recites Sun and Wu, if his heart does not ponder the subtle saying that attack and defense are both alike, who can know that it is so?"

5"Though a state be great, if it loves war it will perish" — strike his heart, guard your own spirit

太宗曰:「《司馬法》言:『國雖大,好戰必亡;天下雖平,忘戰必危。』,此亦攻守一道乎?」 靖曰:「有國有家者,曷嘗不講乎攻守也?夫攻者,不止攻其城、擊其陳而已,必有攻其心之術焉;守者,不止完其壁、堅其陳而已,必也守吾氣而有待焉。大而言之,為君之道;小而言之,為將之法。夫攻其心者,所謂知彼者也;守吾氣者,所謂知己者也。」 太宗曰:「誠哉!朕常臨陳,先料敵之心與己之心孰審,然後彼可得而知焉;察敵之氣與己之氣孰治,然後我可得而知焉。是以知彼知己,兵家大要。今之將臣,雖未知彼,苟能知己,則安有失利者哉?」 靖曰:「孫武所謂『先為不可勝』者,知己者也;『以待敵之可勝』者,知彼者也。又曰:『不可勝在己,可勝在敵。』臣斯須不敢失此誡。」

Taizong said, "The Methods of the Sima says, 'Though a state be great, if it loves war it will surely perish; though all under heaven be at peace, if war is forgotten there will surely be danger.' Is this too the one way of attack and defense?" Li Jing said, "When has anyone who held a state or a house not studied attack and defense? Attack does not stop at striking his walls and striking his ranks; there must be the art of striking his heart as well. Defense does not stop at making one's ramparts whole and one's ranks firm; one must also guard one's own spirit and wait. Spoken of greatly, it is the way of a ruler; spoken of in small, it is the method of a general. Striking his heart is what is called knowing him; guarding one's own spirit is what is called knowing oneself." Taizong said, "Truly so. Whenever I came to the line of battle I first weighed which was the more watchful, the enemy's heart or my own, and after that I could know him; I examined which was the better ordered, the enemy's spirit or my own, and after that I could know myself. Therefore knowing him and knowing oneself is the great heart of the military houses. If the generals who serve me today cannot know him, yet can truly know themselves, how should any of them lose the advantage?" Li Jing said, "What Sun Wu called 'first making yourself one who cannot be beaten' is knowing oneself, and 'waiting until the enemy can be beaten' is knowing him. He also said, 'That you cannot be beaten rests with yourself; that he can be beaten rests with the enemy.' Your servant does not dare lose this warning for a moment."

6"The spirit of the three armies can be taken away" — the morning spirit is not a matter of the hour

太宗曰:「《孫子》言『三軍可奪氣』之法:『朝氣銳,晝氣惰,暮氣歸。善用兵者,避其銳氣,擊其惰歸。』,如何?」 靖曰:「夫含生稟血,鼓作鬬爭,雖死不省者,氣使然也。故用兵之法,必先察吾士眾,激吾勝氣,乃可以擊敵焉。吳起『四機』,以氣機為上,無他道也,能使人人自鬬,則其銳莫當。所謂朝氣銳者,非限時刻而言也;舉一日始末為喻也。凡三鼓,而敵不衰不竭,則安能必使之惰歸哉?蓋學者徒謂空文,而為敵所誘。苟悟奪之之理,則兵可任矣。」

Taizong said, "The Sunzi speaks of the method by which the spirit of the three armies can be taken away: 'The morning spirit is keen, the daytime spirit is idle, the evening spirit turns home. One who uses troops well avoids his keen spirit and strikes him when he is idle and turning home.' How is this?" Li Jing said, "That things which hold life and are given blood beat the drum, rouse themselves to fight, and do not look back even at death — it is the spirit that makes them so. Therefore the method of using troops is that one must first examine one's own officers and men and rouse one's own winning spirit, and only then can one strike the enemy. In the four triggers of Wu Qi, the trigger of spirit is put first, and there is no other way than this. If each man can be made to fight of himself, his keenness cannot be withstood. What is called the morning spirit being keen is not spoken with the hours marked off; it takes the beginning and the end of one day as a likeness. If the drum is beaten three times and the enemy neither wanes nor is spent, how can he be made of necessity to grow idle and turn home? Learners commonly take it for empty writing and so are lured by the enemy. If a man truly understands the principle of taking the spirit away, troops can be entrusted to him."

7How is Li Ji to be handed on to the crown prince

太宗曰:「卿嘗言李勣能兵法,久可用否?然非朕控御,則不可用也。他日太子治,若何御之?」 靖曰:「為陛下計,莫若黜勣,令太子復用之,則必感恩圖報,於理何損乎?」 太宗曰:「善!朕無疑矣。」

Taizong said, "You once said that Li Ji is able in the methods of war. Can he be used for long? Yet unless I hold him he cannot be used. In days to come, how will the crown prince Zhi hold him?" Li Jing said, "Reckoning for Your Majesty, there is nothing like putting Li Ji out of office and letting the crown prince use him again. Then he will surely be moved by the kindness and plan to repay it. What harm is there in the reason of it?" Taizong said, "Good. I have no doubt."

8If Li Ji and Zhangsun Wuji hold the government together

太宗曰:「李勣若與長孫無忌共掌國政,他日如何?」 靖曰:「勣忠義,臣可保任也。無忌佐命大功,陛下以肺腑之親,委之輔相;然外貌下士,內實嫉賢。故尉遲敬德,面折其短,遂引退焉;侯君集恨其忘舊,因以犯逆,皆無忌致其然也。陛下詢及臣,臣不敢避其說。」 太宗曰:「勿泄也,朕徐思其處置。」

Taizong said, "If Li Ji were to hold the government of the state together with Zhangsun Wuji, how would it be in days to come?" Li Jing said, "Li Ji is loyal and right, and your servant can stand surety for him. Wuji has the great merit of having helped found the mandate, and Your Majesty, for the closeness of kin, has entrusted him with the office of chief minister. Yet outwardly he humbles himself to men of learning, while inwardly he is truly jealous of the worthy. So Yuchi Jingde broke down his faults to his face and then withdrew, and Hou Junji, resenting that he forgot old ties, fell into rebellion because of it. Both were brought to that by Wuji. Your Majesty has asked your servant, and your servant does not dare avoid saying it." Taizong said, "Do not let this out. I shall think slowly how to deal with it."

9The ruler who commands commanders — Liu Bang and Xiang Yu, and Emperor Guangwu

太宗曰:「漢高祖能將將,其後韓、彭見誅,蕭何下獄,何故如此?」 靖曰:「臣觀劉、項,皆非將將之君。當秦之亡也,張良本為韓報仇。陳平、韓信皆怨楚不用,故假漢之勢,自為奮爾。至於蕭、曹、樊、灌,悉由亡命。高祖因之以得天下。設使六國之後復立,人人各懷其舊,則雖有能將將之才,豈為漢用哉?臣謂漢得天下,由張良借箸之謀,蕭何漕輓之功也。以此言之,韓、彭見誅,范增不用,其事同也。臣故謂劉、項皆非將將之君。」 太宗曰:「光武中興,能保全功臣,不任以吏事,此則善於將將乎?」 靖曰:「光武雖藉前構,易於成功,然莽勢不下於項籍,寇、鄧未越於蕭、張,獨能推赤心,用柔治,保全功臣,賢於高祖遠矣!以此論將將之道,臣謂光武得之。」

Taizong said, "Emperor Gaozu of Han was able to command his commanders. Why then were Han Xin and Peng Yue put to death afterward, and Xiao He thrown into prison?" Li Jing said, "As your servant sees it, neither Liu Bang nor Xiang Yu was a ruler who could command commanders. When Qin was falling, Zhang Liang meant from the first to avenge his own state of Han. Chen Ping and Han Xin both resented that Chu would not use them, and so they borrowed the power of the house of Han to raise themselves, that is all. As for Xiao He, Cao Can, Fan Kuai and Guan Ying, they all came out of men fleeing for their lives. Gaozu leaned on these and got all under heaven. Suppose the heirs of the six states had been set up again: each man would have held to his old lord, and though there were talent for commanding commanders, how would it have been used by the house of Han? Your servant holds that the house of the house of Han got all under heaven through Zhang Liang's plan told with borrowed chopsticks and Xiao He's merit in hauling grain by water. Spoken of in this way, the putting to death of Han Xin and Peng Yue and the not using of Fan Zeng are one and the same matter. Your servant therefore says that neither Liu Bang nor Xiang Yu was a ruler who could command commanders." Taizong said, "Emperor Guangwu restored the house and was able to keep his meritorious officers whole, not burdening them with the work of clerks. Was this then being good at commanding commanders?" Li Jing said, "Guangwu leaned on the frame built before him and found success easy. Yet Wang Mang's power was not less than Xiang Yu's, and Kou Xun and Deng Yu did not surpass Xiao He and Zhang Liang. He alone pushed forward a red heart, used gentle rule, and kept his meritorious officers whole. He is far worthier than Gaozu. If the way of commanding commanders is judged by this, your servant holds that Guangwu had it."

10The rite of sending out a general — the fast and the axes

太宗曰:「古者出師命將,齋三日,授之以鉞,曰:『從此至天,將軍制之。』又授之以斧,曰:『從此至地,將軍制之。』又推其轂,曰:『進退唯時。既行,軍中但聞將軍之令,不聞君命。』朕謂此禮久廢,今欲與卿定遣將之儀,如何?」 靖曰:「臣竊謂聖人制作,致齋於廟者,所以假威於神也;授斧鉞又推其轂者,所以委寄以權也。今陛下每有出師,必與公卿議論,告廟而後遣,此則邀以神至矣;每有任將,必使之便宜從事,此則假以權重矣。何與於致齋推轂邪?盡合古禮,其義同焉,不須參定。」 上曰:「善!」乃命近臣書此二事,為後世法。

Taizong said, "In old times, when an army was sent out and a general named, they fasted for three days and gave him the great axe, saying, 'From here up to heaven, the general shall command it.' And they gave him the axe, saying, 'From here down to the earth, the general shall command it.' And they pushed the hub of his chariot, saying, 'Advance and withdraw only as the time requires. Once you have gone, in the camp they hear only the general's order and do not hear the ruler's command.' I say this rite has long been abandoned, and now I wish to settle with you the ceremony for sending out a general. How is it?" Li Jing said, "Your servant privately holds that when the sages made this, the full fast in the ancestral shrine was to borrow awe from the spirits, and the giving of the axes and the pushing of the hub were to hand over authority. Now Your Majesty, whenever an army goes out, always discusses it with the high ministers and reports at the shrine before sending it, and so the meeting of the spirits is complete. Whenever you entrust a general, you always let him act as the case requires, and so the lending of authority is weighty. How does this differ from the full fast and the pushing of the hub? All of it meets the old rite and its sense is the same. There is nothing to weigh and settle anew." The emperor said, "Good." Then he ordered the attendants near him to write down these two matters, to be a law for later ages.

11May the arts of yin and yang be abolished — the jiazi day and the wangwang day, Tian Dan and Taigong

太宗曰:「陰陽術數,廢之可乎?」 靖曰:「不可。兵者,詭道也。託之以陰陽術數,則使貪使愚,茲不可廢也。」 太宗曰:「卿嘗言:『天官、時日,明將不法,闇將拘之。』,廢亦宜然!」 靖曰:「昔紂以甲子日亡,武王以甲子日興;天官、時日,甲子一也。殷亂周治,興亡異焉。又宋武帝以徃亡日起兵,軍吏以為不可,帝曰:『我徃彼亡。』果克之。由此言之,可廢明矣。然而田單為燕所圍,單命一人為神,拜而祠之,神言:『燕可破。』,單於是以火牛出擊燕,大破之。此是兵家詭道,天官、時日亦猶此也。」 太宗曰:「田單託神怪而破燕,太公焚蓍龜而滅紂。二事相反,何也?」 靖曰:「其機一也,或逆而取之,或順而行之是也。昔太公佐武王,至牧野,遇雷雨,旗鼓毀折,散宜生欲卜吉而後行,此則因軍中疑懼,必假卜以問神焉。太公以為腐草枯骨無足問。且以臣伐君,豈可再乎?然觀散宜生發機於前,太公成機於後,逆順雖異,其理致則同。臣前所謂術數不可廢者,蓋存其機於未萌也。及其成功,在人事而已矣。」

Taizong said, "May the arts and numbers of yin and yang be abolished?" Li Jing said, "They may not. War is a way of deceit. Leaning on the arts and numbers of yin and yang, one can put the greedy to use and put the foolish to use. These may not be abolished." Taizong said, "You once said, 'The offices of heaven and the choosing of days — the clear-sighted general does not take them for law, and the benighted general is bound by them.' Then it is right to abolish them as well." Li Jing said, "Of old, Zhou Xin perished on a jiazi day and King Wu rose on a jiazi day. In the offices of heaven and the choosing of days, the jiazi is one and the same. Yin was in disorder and the house of Zhou was well ruled, and their rise and fall differed. Again, Emperor Wu of Song raised his troops on a day of going and perishing (徃亡日), and the officers of the army said it could not be done. But the emperor said, 'I go, and he perishes.' And he did win. Spoken of in this way, it is clear that they may be abolished. Yet when Tian Dan was surrounded by Yan, Dan ordered one man to act as a spirit and bowed and sacrificed to him, and the spirit said, 'Yan can be broken.' Dan then went out with the fire oxen and struck Yan and broke it utterly. This is the way of deceit of the military houses, and the offices of heaven and the choosing of days are just like this." Taizong said, "Tian Dan leaned on a spirit marvel and broke Yan, and Taigong burned the yarrow stalks and the tortoise shell and destroyed Zhou Xin. The two matters are opposite. Why is this?" Li Jing said, "Their trigger is one. The one took it against the grain, the other went along with it. Of old, when Taigong helped King Wu and they came to Muye, they met thunder and rain, and the banners and drums were broken. San Yisheng wished to divine for a lucky sign before going. This was because the host was doubting and afraid, so he had to borrow the divination to ask the spirits. Taigong held that rotten grass and dry bones were not worth asking. Besides, when a subject strikes his ruler, how can it be done twice? Yet if one sees how San Yisheng raised the trigger before and Taigong completed the trigger after, then although going against and going along differ, the principle they reach is the same. When your servant said just now that the arts and numbers may not be abolished, it was to keep that trigger in hold before it has sprouted. When it comes to bringing the work to success, it lies in human affairs and nothing else."

Interlinear notes 1

徃亡日

The wangwang ri (徃亡日) was a day shunned for military affairs, its name meaning "go and you perish." The emperor's reply, "I go and they perish," plays on that very name. — translator

12An army under regulation — it neither wins greatly nor loses greatly

太宗曰:「當今將帥,唯李勣、道宗、薛萬徹。除道宗以親屬外,孰堪大用?」 靖曰:「陛下嘗言勣、道宗用兵,不大勝亦不大敗;萬徹若不大勝即須大敗。臣愚思聖言,不求大勝亦不大敗者,節制之兵也;或大勝或大敗者,幸而成功者也。故孫武云:『善戰者,立於不敗之地,而不失敵之敗也。』,節制在我云爾。」

Taizong said, "Among the commanders of today there are only Li Ji, Daozong and Xue Wanche. Setting Daozong aside as a kinsman, who is fit for great use?" Li Jing said, "Your Majesty once said that Li Ji and Daozong use troops so that they neither win greatly nor lose greatly, while Wanche, if he does not win greatly, must lose greatly. Your servant in his folly has pondered Your Majesty's words. Not seeking a great victory and not suffering a great defeat is an army under regulation. Winning greatly at one time and losing greatly at another is bringing off success by luck. Therefore Sun Wu said, 'One who fights well stands on ground where he cannot be beaten and does not let slip the enemy's defeat.' It means that the regulation rests with me."

13Not fighting rests with me, fighting of necessity rests with the enemy

太宗曰:「兩陳相臨,欲言不戰,安可得乎?」 靖曰:「昔晉師伐秦,交綏而退。《司馬法》曰:『逐奔不遠,縱綏不及。』臣謂綏者,御轡之索也。我兵既有節制,彼敵亦正行伍,豈敢輕戰哉?故有出而交綏,退而不逐,各防其失敗者也。孫武云:『勿擊堂堂之陳,無邀正正之旗。』若兩陳體均勢等,苟一輕肆,為其所乘,則或大敗,理使然也。是故,兵有不戰、有必戰。夫不戰者在我,必戰者在敵。」 太宗曰:「不戰在我,何謂也?」 靖曰:「孫武云:『我不欲戰者,畫地而守之,敵不得與我戰者,乖其所之也。』敵有人焉,則交綏之間,未可圖也。故曰不戰在我。夫必戰在敵者,孫武云:『善動敵者,形之,敵必從之;予之,敵必取之。以利動之,以本待之。』。敵無人焉,則必來戰,吾得以乘而破之。故曰必戰者在敵。」

Taizong said, "When two lines of battle face each other and one wishes to say there shall be no fighting, can it be had?" Li Jing said, "Of old, when the army of Jin attacked Qin, they touched reins and drew back. The Methods of the Sima says, 'Pursue the fleeing, but not far; give rein to the withdrawing, but do not reach them.' Your servant holds that sui (綏) is the cord by which the reins are held. If our troops are already under regulation and the enemy too has his ranks in order, how should either dare fight lightly? So they went out and touched reins, then drew back and did not pursue, each guarding against his own defeat. Sun Wu said, 'Do not strike ranks that stand in full array; do not meet banners drawn up in perfect order.' When two lines are even in body and equal in force, if one acts lightly just once and is taken by the other, he may be greatly beaten. The principle makes it so. Therefore in war there is not fighting and there is fighting of necessity. Not fighting rests with me; fighting of necessity rests with the enemy." Taizong said, "Not fighting rests with me. What does this mean?" Li Jing said, "Sun Wu said, 'If I do not wish to fight, I draw a line on the ground and hold it, and the enemy cannot fight with me, because I turn him from where he is going.' If the enemy has a man of worth, then in the space of touching reins nothing can be plotted. Therefore it is said that not fighting rests with me. As for fighting of necessity resting with the enemy, Sun Wu said, 'One who moves the enemy well shows him a form, and the enemy will surely follow it; gives him something, and the enemy will surely take it. He moves him with profit and waits for him with the root.' If the enemy has no man of worth, he will surely come and fight, and I can take him and break him. Therefore it is said that fighting of necessity rests with the enemy."

14Compile the regulation of the ages into charts and present them

太宗曰:「深乎!節制之兵。得其法則昌,失其法則亡。卿為纂述歷代善於節制者,具圖來上,朕當擇其精微,垂於後世。」 靖曰:「臣前所進黃帝、太公二陳圖,并《司馬法》、諸葛亮奇正之法,此已精悉。歷代名將,用其一二,成功者亦眾矣。但史官鮮克知兵,不能紀其實迹焉。臣敢不奉詔,當纂述以聞。」

Taizong said, "How deep it is, an army under regulation. Get its method and you flourish; lose its method and you perish. Compile for me an account of those in the ages past who were good at regulation, and present it with the charts complete. I shall choose what is fine and subtle in it and hand it down to later ages." Li Jing said, "The two battle charts of the Yellow Emperor and Taigong that your servant presented before, together with the Methods of the Sima and Zhuge Liang's method of the unorthodox and the orthodox, are already fine and full. Of the famous generals of the ages, many used one or two of these and brought off success. Only, the historians have seldom been men who knew war, and they could not record the real traces of it. How should your servant not take up the edict? I shall compile it and report."

15The three grades in the methods of war — the Way, heaven and earth, the general's law, and the book passed to Li Ji

太宗曰:「兵法,孰為最深?」 靖曰:「臣常分為三等,使學者當漸而至焉。一曰道,二曰天地,三曰將法。夫道之說,至微至深;《易》所謂『聰明叡智,神武而不殺』者是也。夫天之說陰陽,地之說險易。善用兵者,能以陰奪陽,以險攻易;《孟子》所謂『天時地利』者是也。夫將法之說,在乎任人利器;《三略》所謂『得士者昌』、《管子》所謂『器必堅利』者是也。」 太宗曰:「然!吾謂不戰而屈人之兵者,上也;百戰百勝者,中也;深溝高壘以自守者,下也。以是校量,孫武著書,三等皆具焉。」 靖曰:「觀其文,迹其事,亦可差別矣。若張良、范蠡、孫武,脫然高引,不知所往,此非知道,安能爾乎?若樂毅、管仲、諸葛亮,戰必勝,守必固,此非察天時地利,安能爾乎?其次王猛之保秦,謝安之守晉,非任將擇材,繕完自固,安能爾乎?故習兵之學,必先繇下以及中,繇中以及上,則漸而深矣。不然,則垂空言,徒記誦,無足取也。」 太宗曰:「道家忌三世為將者,不可妄傳也,亦不可不傳也。卿其慎之。」靖再拜出,盡傳其書與李勣。

Taizong said, "In the methods of war, which is deepest?" Li Jing said, "Your servant has always divided them into three grades, so that the learner may come to them by degrees. The first is the Way, the second is heaven and earth, the third is the general's law. The saying of the Way is most subtle and most deep; what the Book of Changes calls 'clear-sighted and wise, godlike in arms and yet not killing' is this. The saying of heaven is yin and yang, and the saying of earth is the rugged and the easy. One who uses troops well can take the yang by the yin and strike the easy from the rugged; what the Mengzi calls 'the season of heaven and the profit of earth' is this. The saying of the general's law lies in entrusting men and sharpening weapons; what the Three Strategies calls 'he who wins men of worth flourishes' and what the Guanzi calls 'weapons must be firm and sharp' are this." Taizong said, "So it is. I hold that to bend another's troops without fighting is the highest, to win a hundred battles out of a hundred is the middle, and to dig the moat deep and raise the rampart high and guard oneself is the lowest. Measured by this, the book Sun Wu wrote has all three grades complete." Li Jing said, "Looking at their writings and tracing their deeds, one can indeed tell them apart. Zhang Liang, Fan Li and Sun Wu slipped free and drew away high, and no one knew where they went. Without knowing the Way, how could they be like that? Yue Yi, Guan Zhong and Zhuge Liang fought and always won, defended and were always firm. Without examining the season of heaven and the profit of earth, how could they be like that? Next after them, Wang Meng kept Qin whole and Xie An guarded Jin. Without entrusting generals and choosing men of ability, and repairing their defenses to make themselves firm, how could they be like that? Therefore in the study of war one must go first from the lowest to the middle, and from the middle to the highest, and then it deepens by degrees. Otherwise a man hands down empty words and merely recites them by rote, and there is nothing to take from it." Taizong said, "The Daoists shun a house that has been generals for three generations. It may not be passed on rashly, and it may not be left unpassed. Be careful of it." Li Jing bowed twice and went out, and passed on the whole of the book to Li Ji.