Yetgeul › Xunzi (The Book of Master Xun) › The Achievements of the Ru

Ruxiao — The Achievements of the Confucians儒效篇

Xunzi (The Book of Master Xun) 荀子 · Xun Kuang · 3rd century BC · 10 passages · 4,329 Chinese characters · reading time 17.3 min

Xunzi (The Book of Master Xun) The Achievements of the Ru Where Mencius put the goodness of man's nature, Xunzi put its evil. Man's nature is born loving gain and full of envy and hate, and left as it is it falls to struggle and robbery and disorder — so only when teachers and law make him what he should be, and ritual and right lead him, is he governed. Goodness, he said, is not inborn but built up by effort. The first chapter, "An Exhortation to Learning," opens with "blue dye is taken from the indigo plant, yet it is bluer than indigo," and "A Discourse on Heaven" cuts Heaven loose from the affairs of men: "To make Heaven great and brood upon it, how does that compare with rearing it as a thing and cutting it to use?" "A Discourse on Ritual" traces where ritual came from to the contention of desire and goods, and "A Discourse on Music" strikes back at Mozi for condemning music. "The Rectification of Names" shows that names are not fixed by Heaven but agreed upon by men, and the one chapter "Working Songs" carries order and disorder on the tunes of laborers' songs. "The ruler is the boat, the common people are the water; the water bears the boat up, and the water overturns the boat" stands in "The Regulations of a King." Li Si and Han Fei both came out of his school.

大儒之效:武王崩,成王幼,周公屏成王而及武王以屬天下,惡天下之倍周也。履天子之籍,聽天下之斷,偃然如固有之,而天下不稱貪焉;殺管叔,虛殷國,而天下不稱戾焉;兼制天下,立七十一國,姬姓獨居五十三人,而天下不稱偏焉。教誨開導成王,使諭於道,而能揜迹於文、武。周公歸周,反籍於成王,而天下不輟事周,然而周公北面而朝之。天子也者,不可以少當也,不可以假攝爲也。能則天下歸之,不能則天下去之,是以周公屏成王而及武王以屬天下,惡天下之離周也。成王冠,成人,周公歸周反籍焉,明不滅主之義也。周公無天下矣,鄉有天下,今無天下,非擅也;成王鄉無天下,今有天下,非奪也:變埶次序節然也。故以枝代主而非越也,以弟誅兄而非曓也,君臣易位而非不順也。因天下之和,遂文、武之業,明主枝之義,抑亦變化矣,天下厭然猶一也。非聖人莫之能爲,夫是之謂大儒之效。

The achievement of the great scholar. King Wu died and King Cheng was young, so the Duke of Zhou set King Cheng aside and took up the place of King Wu to hold all under heaven, for he hated that all under heaven should turn its back on Zhou. He trod the seat of the Son of Heaven and heard the judgments of all under heaven, at ease as though it had been his own from the first, and all under heaven did not call him greedy. He killed Guan Shu and emptied the state of Yin, and all under heaven did not call him harsh. He cut out and ordered all under heaven together and set up seventy-one states, of which the Ji surname alone held fifty-three, and all under heaven did not call him partial.

He taught and guided King Cheng and made him understand the way, so that he could cover his traces before King Wen and King Wu. The Duke of Zhou went back to Zhou and returned the seat to King Cheng, and all under heaven did not cease to serve Zhou, and the Duke of Zhou faced north and paid court to him.

The Son of Heaven is not a place that youth can fill, nor a place to be held by borrowing and standing in. If a man is able, all under heaven turns to him; if he is not able, all under heaven leaves him. This is why the Duke of Zhou set King Cheng aside and took up the place of King Wu to hold all under heaven, for he hated that all under heaven should fall away from Zhou. When King Cheng put on the cap and became a man, the Duke of Zhou went back to Zhou and returned the seat, and so made clear the right of not doing away with the ruler.

The Duke of Zhou had all under heaven no longer. Before, he had all under heaven, and now he has it not, and this was not seizing it for himself. King Cheng before had not all under heaven, and now he has it, and this was not taking it away. The changing of the situation and the ordering of the sequence were of themselves so.

So for a branch to take the place of the trunk was not overstepping, for a younger brother to cut down an elder brother was not cruelty, and for ruler and subject to change places was not disobedience. He followed the harmony of all under heaven, carried through the work of King Wen and King Wu, and made clear the right of trunk and branch. This too was change and alteration, yet all under heaven was at ease and still one. None but a sage could do it, and this is what is called the achievement of the great scholar.

秦昭王問孫卿子曰:「儒無益於人之國。」孫卿子曰:「儒者法先王,隆禮義,謹乎臣子而致貴其上者也。人主用之,則埶在本朝而宜;不用,則退編百姓而慤,必爲順下矣。雖窮困凍餧,必不以邪道爲貪;無置錐之地而明於持社稷之大義;嘄呼而莫之能應,然而通乎財萬物、養百姓之經紀。埶在人上則王公之材也,在人下則社稷之臣,國君之寶也。雖隱於窮閻漏屋,人莫不貴之,道誠存也。仲尼將爲司寇,沈猶氏不敢朝飲其羊,公慎氏出其妻,慎潰氏踰境而徙,魯之粥牛馬者不豫賈,必蚤正以待之也。居於闕黨,闕黨之子弟罔不分,有親者取多,孝弟以化之也。儒者在本朝則美政,在下位則美俗,儒之爲人下如是矣。」王曰:「然則其爲人上何如?」孫卿曰:「其爲人上也廣大矣:志意定乎內,禮節修乎朝,法則度量正乎官,忠信愛利形乎下,行一不義、殺一無罪而得天下,不爲也。此君義信乎人矣,通於四海,則天下應之如讙。是何也?則貴名白而天下治也。故近者歌謳而樂之,遠者竭蹶而趨之,四海之內若一家,通達之屬莫不從服,夫是之謂人師。《詩》曰:『自西自東,自南自北,無思不服。』此之謂也。夫其爲人下也如彼,其爲人上也如此,何謂其無益於人之國也?」昭王曰:「善。」

King Zhao of Qin asked Sun Qingzi, "The scholar is of no benefit to another man's state."

Sun Qingzi said, "The scholar takes the former kings for his law, honors ritual and rightness, is careful in being subject and son, and makes his superior utterly honored. If the ruler of men uses him, his place is in the court and it is fitting. If he is not used, he withdraws and ranks among the hundred families and is sincere, and he is sure to be an obedient subordinate.

Though he be blocked and poor, frozen and starving, he will never be greedy by a crooked way. Though he has not land enough to set down an awl, he is clear about upholding the great right of the altars of earth and grain. He may cry out and none can answer, yet he goes through the guiding threads of making a wealth of the ten thousand things and nourishing the hundred families. If his place is above men, he is timber for a king or a duke; if it is below men, he is a servant of the altars and the treasure of the lord of a state. Though he hide in a poor lane and a leaking house, there is no one who does not honor him, for the way is truly in him.

When Zhongni was about to become minister of justice, the Shenyou clan dared not water their sheep in the morning, the head of the Gongshen clan sent his wife away, the Shenkui clan crossed the border and moved off, and those who sold oxen and horses in Lu did not raise their prices. It was that he had set himself right early and so awaited them. When he lived in Quedang, the sons and younger brothers of Quedang divided what they had netted, and those who had parents took more. It was that filial piety and brotherliness had changed them.

The scholar in the court makes the government beautiful, and in a low place he makes the customs beautiful. Such is the scholar when he is below men."

The king said, "Then what of him when he is above men?"

Sun Qingzi said, "When he is above men he is broad and great. His will is settled within, the measures of ritual are cultivated in the court, law and standard and measure are made right in the offices, and loyalty and good faith and love and benefit take shape below. To do one unrighteous deed or kill one innocent man and so gain all under heaven, he would not do. When this ruler's right is trusted by men and goes through the four seas, all under heaven answers him like a shout of joy.

Why is this so? It is that his honored name is clear and all under heaven is ordered. So those near sing and take joy in him, and those far off stumble and hurry to him, and within the four seas it is like one household, and among all that can be reached there is none that does not follow and submit. This is what is called the teacher of men. The Odes say, 'From the west and from the east, from the south and from the north, there was no thought but to submit.' This is what is meant.

When he is below men he is like that, and when he is above men he is like this. How can it be said that he is of no benefit to another man's state?"

King Zhao said, "Good."

Interlinear notes 1

孫卿

Here the source text writes 孫卿 at the third mention. It is the same man as in the two before, so the one name Sun Qingzi is kept. ― translator

先王之道,人之隆也,比中而行之。曷謂中?曰:禮義是也。道者,非天之道,非地之道,人之所以道也,君子之所道也。君子之所謂賢者,非能徧能人之所能之謂也;君子之所謂知者,非能徧知人之所知之謂也;君子之所謂辯者,非能徧辯人之所辯之謂也;君子之所謂察者,非能徧察人之所察之謂也;有所正矣。相高下,視墝肥,序五種,君子不如農人;通貨財,相美惡,辯貴賤,君子不如賈人;設規矩,陳繩墨,便備用,君子不如工人;不卹是非然不然之情,以相薦撙,以相恥怍,君子不若惠施、鄧析。若夫謫德而定次,量能而授官,使賢不肖皆得其位,能不能皆得其官,萬物得其宜,事變得其應,慎、墨不得進其談,惠施、鄧析不敢竄其察,言必當理,事必當務,是然後君子之所長也。凡事行,有益於理者立之,無益於理者廢之,夫是之謂中事。凡知說,有益於理者爲之,無益於理者舍之,夫是之謂中說。事行失中謂之姦事,知說失中謂之姦道。姦事姦道,治世之所棄,而亂世之所從服也。若夫充虛之相施易也,堅白、同異之分隔也,是聰耳之所不能聽也,明目之所不能見也,辯士之所不能言也,雖有聖人之知,未能僂指也。不知無害爲君子,知之無損爲小人。工匠不知無害爲巧,君子不知無害爲治。王公好之則亂法,百姓好之則亂事。而狂惑戇陋之人,乃始率其羣徒,辯其談說,明其辟稱,老身長子,不知惡也。夫是之謂上愚,曾不如相雞狗之可以爲名也。《詩》曰:「爲鬼爲蜮,則不可得。有靦面目,視人罔極。作此好歌,以極反側。」此之謂也。

The way of the former kings is the height of man, and it is carried out by measuring against the mean. What is called the mean? The answer is, ritual and rightness.

The way is not the way of heaven and not the way of earth. It is that by which man goes, and that which the gentleman walks.

What the gentleman calls worthy is not being able in everything that others are able in. What the gentleman calls wise is not knowing everything that others know. What the gentleman calls disputing is not disputing everything that others dispute. What the gentleman calls examining is not examining everything that others examine. There is that which he sets right.

In looking at high ground and low, seeing which soil is barren and which is rich, and putting the five grains in order, the gentleman is not the equal of the farmer. In circulating goods and wealth, looking at fine and foul, and telling costly from cheap, the gentleman is not the equal of the merchant. In setting up compass and square, laying out line and ink, and making tools ready for use, the gentleman is not the equal of the craftsman. In caring nothing for the truth of right and wrong, of so and not so, and in pushing at one another and shaming one another, the gentleman is not the equal of Hui Shi and Deng Xi.

But as for weighing virtue and settling rank, measuring ability and granting office, so that the worthy and the unworthy all get their places and the able and the unable all get their offices, so that the ten thousand things get what suits them and the turns of affairs get their answer, so that Shen Dao and Mozi cannot bring their talk forward and Hui Shi and Deng Xi dare not slip in their examining, so that words are sure to fit the pattern and affairs are sure to fit the work, only then is it what the gentleman excels in.

In all affairs and conduct, what benefits the pattern is set up and what does not benefit the pattern is cast out, and this is what is called affairs of the mean. In all knowing and speaking, what benefits the pattern is done and what does not benefit the pattern is put aside, and this is what is called speech of the mean. Affairs and conduct that lose the mean are called crooked affairs, and knowing and speaking that lose the mean are called a crooked way. Crooked affairs and a crooked way are what an ordered age throws away and what a disordered age follows and submits to.

As for the full and the empty shifting and changing into each other, and hard and white, same and different, being split apart, these are what a sharp ear cannot hear, what a clear eye cannot see, what a disputing scholar cannot speak, and what even the knowledge of a sage cannot count off on the fingers. Not to know them does no harm to being a gentleman, and to know them takes nothing from being a small man. That a craftsman does not know them does no harm to his skill, and that a gentleman does not know them does no harm to his ordering. If kings and dukes love them, the law is thrown into disorder; if the hundred families love them, affairs are thrown into disorder.

Yet mad and deluded, dull and narrow men go on to lead their crowds of followers, to dispute their talk and speech, and to make clear their comparisons; their bodies grow old and their sons grow up, and they do not know it is bad. This is what is called the highest folly, and it is not even as good as reading fowls and dogs, by which a man may at least get a name. The Odes say, "Were you a ghost or a water-lurker, you could not be got at. But you have a face and eyes and show them to men without end. I make this good song to tell out your tossing and turning." This is what is meant.

我欲賤而貴,愚而智,貧而富,可乎?曰:其唯學乎。彼學者,行之,曰士也;敦慕焉,君子也;知之,聖人也。上爲聖人,下爲士君子,孰禁我哉!鄉也,混然涂之人也,俄而竝乎堯、禹,豈不賤而貴矣哉!鄉也,效門室之辨,混然曾不能決也,俄而原仁義,分是非,圓囘天下於掌上而辯白黑,豈不愚而知矣哉!鄉也,胥靡之人,俄而治天下之大器舉在此,豈不貧而富矣哉!今有人於此,屑然藏千溢之寶,雖行貣而食,人謂之富矣。彼寶也者,衣之不可衣也,食之不可食也,賣之不可僂售也,然而人謂之富,何也?豈不大富之器誠在此也?是杅杅亦富人已,豈不貧而富矣哉!故君子無爵而貴,無禄而富,不言而信,不怒而威,窮處而榮,獨居而樂,豈不至尊、至富、至重、至嚴之情舉積此哉!故曰:貴名不可以比周争也,不可以夸誕有也,不可以埶重脅也,必將誠此然後就也。争之則失,讓之則至,遵道則積,夸誕則虛。故君子務修其內而讓之於外,務積德於身而處之以遵道,如是,則貴名起如日月,天下應之如雷霆。故曰:君子隱而顯,微而明,辭讓而勝。《詩》曰:「鶴鳴于九皋,聲聞于天。」此之謂也。鄙夫反是。比周而譽俞少,鄙争而名俞辱,煩勞以求安利,其身俞危。《詩》曰:「民之無良,相怨一方。受爵不讓,至于己斯亡。」此之謂也。故能小而事大,辟之是猶力之少而任重也,舍粹折無適也。身不肖而誣賢,是猶傴伸而好升高也,指其頂者愈衆。故明主譎德而序位,所以爲不亂也;忠臣誠能然後敢受職,所以爲不窮也。分不亂於上,能不窮於下,治辯之極也。《詩》曰:「平平左右,亦是率從。」是言上下之交不相亂也。

I wish to be base and yet honored, foolish and yet wise, poor and yet rich. Can it be done? The answer is, only through learning.

As for the learner: if he acts on it, he is called a scholar; if he loves it deeply, he is a gentleman; if he knows it, he is a sage. Above I may become a sage and below a scholar and gentleman. Who is to stop me?

Before, he was a muddled man of the road, and in a moment he stands level with King Yao and King Yu. Is this not to be base and yet honored? Before, at telling gate from room he was muddled and could never decide, and in a moment he traces benevolence and rightness to their source, divides right from wrong, rolls all under heaven on his palm and tells white from black. Is this not to be foolish and yet wise? Before, he was a man in bonds, and in a moment the great vessels for ordering all under heaven are all in him. Is this not to be poor and yet rich?

Now suppose a man here keeps hidden away a treasure of a thousand yi (溢), and though he begs for his food, men call him rich. That treasure cannot be worn for clothing and cannot be eaten for food, and if he sells it, it will not sell at once. Yet men call him rich. Why? Is it not that the vessel of great wealth is truly in him? So even this simple fellow is a rich man. Is this not to be poor and yet rich?

So the gentleman has no rank and yet is honored, has no stipend and yet is rich, does not speak and yet is trusted, does not grow angry and yet is awesome, dwells blocked and yet is glorious, lives alone and yet is glad. Is it not that the utmost honor, the utmost wealth, the utmost weight and the utmost dignity are all heaped up in him?

So it is said: an honored name cannot be won by banding together and fighting for it, cannot be had by boasting and wild talk, cannot be forced by power and weight. A man must make this true in himself, and only then does he reach it. Fight for it and you lose it; yield it and it comes. Follow the way and it gathers; boast and talk wildly and it empties.

So the gentleman works at cultivating what is within and yields to others without, works at heaping virtue in his own person and dwells in it by following the way. In this way his honored name rises like the sun and moon, and all under heaven answers him like thunder. So it is said: the gentleman is hidden and yet shows, small and yet clear, yielding and yet wins. The Odes say, "The crane cries in the ninth fold of the marsh, and its voice is heard in heaven." This is what is meant.

The mean fellow is the opposite of this. The more he bands together, the less he is praised. The more meanly he fights, the more his name is shamed. The more he troubles and labors to seek ease and benefit, the more his own person is endangered. The Odes say, "The people who are not good resent only the one side. They take rank and do not yield, and it comes at last to their own ruin." This is what is meant.

So when ability is small and the task is great, it is like having little strength and carrying a heavy load: there is nowhere to go but to be crushed and broken. When a man is unworthy in himself and deceives the worthy, it is like a hunchback trying to straighten and loving to climb high: the more people there are to point at the crown of his head.

So the enlightened ruler weighs virtue and orders the ranks, and this is how there comes to be no disorder. The loyal subject is truly able and only then dares to take a charge, and this is how there comes to be no blocking. When the divisions are not thrown into disorder above and ability is not blocked below, this is the height of ordering and distinguishing. The Odes say, "Even and even are those to left and right, and these too follow along." This says that the dealings of above and below do not throw each other into disorder.

以從俗爲善,以貨財爲寶,以養生爲己至道,是民德也。行法至堅,不以私欲亂所聞,如是,則可謂勁士矣。行法至堅,好修正其所聞以橋飾其情性,其言多當矣而未諭也,其行多當矣而未安也,其知慮多當矣而未周密也,上則能大其所隆,下則能開道不己若者,如是,則可謂篤厚君子矣。修百王之法若辨白黑,應當時之變若數一二,行禮要節而安之若生四枝,要時立功之巧若詔四時;平正和民之善,億萬之衆而博若一人,如是,則可謂聖人矣。井井兮其有理也,嚴嚴兮其能敬己也,分分兮其有終始也,猒猒兮其能長久也,樂樂兮其執道不殆也,炤炤兮其用知之明也,修修兮其用統類之行也,綏綏兮其有文章也,熙熙兮其樂人之臧也,隱隱兮其恐人之不當也,如是,則可謂聖人矣。此其道出乎一。曷謂一?曰:執神而固。曷謂神?曰:盡善挾治之謂神,萬物莫足以傾之之謂固,神固之謂聖人。聖人也者,道之管也。天下之道管是矣,百王之道一是矣,故《詩》、《書》、《禮》、《樂》之道歸是矣。《詩》言是,其志也;《書》言是,其事也;《禮》言是,其行也;《樂》言是,其和也;《春秋》言是,其微也。故《風》之所以爲不逐者,取是以節之也;《小雅》之所以爲《小雅》者,取是而文之也;《大雅》之所以爲《大雅》者,取是而光之也;《頌》之所以爲至者,取是而通之也:天下之道畢是矣。鄉是者臧,倍是者亡。鄉是如不臧,倍是如不亡者,自古及今,未嘗有也。

To take following custom for goodness, to take goods and wealth for treasure, and to take nourishing one's own life for one's utmost way, this is the virtue of the common people.

To carry out the law with the utmost firmness and not to let private desire throw into disorder what one has heard, such a man can be called a sturdy scholar.

To carry out the law with the utmost firmness and to love cultivating and setting right what one has heard, so as to straighten and adorn one's nature and feelings; his words are often fitting but he is not yet clear, his conduct is often fitting but he is not yet at ease, his knowing and weighing are often fitting but they are not yet close-woven; above, he can make great what he honors, and below, he can open and guide those who are not his equal; such a man can be called a generous and solid gentleman.

To cultivate the law of a hundred kings as one tells white from black, to answer the turns of the time as one counts one and two, to carry out ritual and hold to its measures and be at ease in them as with one's own four limbs, to be so skilled at holding to the season and setting up merit that it is as though he gave orders to the four seasons, and to be so even and right in the goodness that harmonizes the people that among the countless he is as broad as with one man; such a man can be called a sage.

Jingjing (井井), and he has pattern in him. Yanyan (嚴嚴), and he can revere his own person. Fenfen (分分), and he has an end and a beginning. Yanyan (猒猒), and he can be long and lasting. Lele (樂樂), and he holds the way and is not slack. Zhaozhao (炤炤), and his use of knowledge is clear. Xiuxiu (修修), and his use of the guiding threads and the kinds is carried out. Suisui (綏綏), and he has pattern and figure. Xixi (熙熙), and he takes joy in the goodness of others. Yinyin (隱隱), and he fears that others may not be fitting. Such a man can be called a sage.

This way of his comes out of one thing. What is called the one? The answer is, to hold the spirit (神) and be firm. What is called the spirit? The answer is, to exhaust goodness and carry order within is called the spirit, and that the ten thousand things are not enough to tip him over is called firmness, and spirit and firmness are called the sage.

The sage is the thread on which the way is strung. The way of all under heaven is strung on this, and the way of a hundred kings is one in this, and so the way of the Odes, the Documents, the Rites and the Music comes back to this. Where the Odes speak of this, it is his will; where the Documents speak of this, it is his affairs; where the Rites speak of this, it is his conduct; where the Music speaks of this, it is his harmony; where the Spring and Autumn speaks of this, it is his subtlety.

So the reason the Guofeng does not run loose is that it takes this and gives it measure. The reason the Xiaoya is the Xiaoya is that it takes this and gives it pattern. The reason the Daya is the Daya is that it takes this and gives it light. The reason the Song is the utmost is that it takes this and makes it go through. The way of all under heaven is complete in this.

He who faces this is good, and he who turns his back on this perishes. One who faced this and was not good, or turned his back on this and did not perish, from old times down to now there has never been such a man.

客有道曰:「孔子曰:『周公其盛乎!身貴而愈恭,家富而愈儉,勝敵而愈戒。』」應之曰:「是殆非周公之行,非孔子之言也。武王崩,成王幼,周公屏成王而及武王,履天子之籍,負扆而坐,諸侯趨走堂下。當是時也,夫又誰爲恭矣哉!兼制天下,立七十一國,姬姓獨居五十三人焉,周之子孫苟不狂惑者,莫不爲天下之顯諸侯,孰謂周公儉哉!武王之誅紂也,行之日以兵忌,東面而迎太歲,至汜而汎,至懷而壞,至共頭而山隧。霍叔懼曰:『出三日而五災至,無乃不可乎?』周公曰:『刳比干而囚箕子,飛廉、惡來知政,夫又惡有不可焉?』遂選馬而進,朝食於戚,暮宿於百泉,旦厭於牧之野,鼓之而紂卒易鄉,遂乘殷人而誅紂。葢殺者非周人,因殷人也。故無首虜之獲,無蹈難之賞,反而定三革,偃五兵,合天下,立聲樂,於是《武》、《象》起而《韶》、《護》廢矣。四海之內,莫不變心易慮以化順之,故外闔不閉,跨天下而無蘄。當是時也,夫又誰爲戒矣哉!」

A guest said, "Confucius said, 'How full was the Duke of Zhou! The more honored he was in his person, the more respectful; the richer his household, the more sparing; the more he beat his enemies, the more wary.'"

The answer to this is, "This is likely not the conduct of the Duke of Zhou, and not the words of Confucius.

King Wu died and King Cheng was young, so the Duke of Zhou set King Cheng aside and took up the place of King Wu, trod the seat of the Son of Heaven, and sat with the screen at his back while the feudal lords hurried below the hall. At such a time, to whom was he respectful?

He cut out and ordered all under heaven together and set up seventy-one states, of which the Ji surname alone held fifty-three, so that among the descendants of Zhou there was none, unless he were mad and deluded, who did not become a shining feudal lord of all under heaven. Who calls the Duke of Zhou sparing?

When King Wu cut down King Zhou (紂), the day he set out was a day forbidden to armies, and he faced east and met Taisui (太歲). He came to the Si and the water flooded, he came to Huai and there was a collapse, and he came to Gongtou and the mountain slid. Huo Shu was afraid and said, 'Three days out, and five disasters have come. Is this not a sign that it cannot be done?' The Duke of Zhou said, 'They cut open Bi Gan and shut up Ji Zi, and Fei Lian and Elai hold the government. What is there then that cannot be done?' And so he picked out his horses and went forward.

In the morning he ate at Qi (戚), at dusk he lodged at Baiquan, and at dawn he came down on the wilds of Mu. The drums were beaten and the soldiers of King Zhou (紂) turned about, and so he rode on the men of Yin and cut down King Zhou. Those who did the killing were not men of Zhou but men of Yin. So there were no heads taken and no captives gained, and no rewards for treading into danger.

He came back and settled the three kinds of armor, laid down the five weapons, joined all under heaven together, and set up sound and music. Then the Wu (武) and the Xiang (象) rose and the Shao (韶) and the Hu (護) were put away. Within the four seas there was none who did not change his heart and alter his thoughts and be changed into following him, and so the outer gates were not shut, and he bestrode all under heaven and wanted nothing. At such a time, of whom was he wary?"

造父者,天下之善御者也,無輿馬則無所見其能。羿者,天下之善射者也,無弓矢則無所見其巧。大儒者,善調一天下者也,無百里之地則無所見其功。輿固馬選矣,而不能以至遠一日而千里,則非造父也。弓調矢直矣,而不能射遠中微,則非羿也。用百里之地,而不能以調一天下,制彊曓,則非大儒也。彼大儒者,雖隱於窮閻漏屋,無置錐之地,而王公不能與之争名;在一大夫之位,則一君不能獨畜,一國不能獨容,成名況乎諸侯,莫不願得以爲臣;用百里之地而千里之國莫能與之争勝,笞棰曓國,齊一天下,而莫能傾也。是大儒之徵也。其言有類,其行有禮,其舉事無悔,其持險應變曲當,與時遷徙,與世偃仰,千舉萬變,其道一也。是大儒之稽也。其窮也,俗儒笑之;其通也,英傑化之,嵬瑣逃之,邪說畏之,衆人媿之。通則一天下,窮則獨立貴名,天不能死,地不能埋,桀、跖之世不能汙,非大儒莫之能立,仲尼、子弓是也。故有俗人者,有俗儒者,有雅儒者,有大儒者。不學問,無正義,以富利爲隆,是俗人者也。逢衣淺帶,解果其冠,略法先王而足亂世術,繆學雜舉,不知法後王而一制度,不知隆禮義而殺《詩》、《書》;其衣冠行僞已同於世俗矣,然而不知惡者;其言議談說已無異於墨子矣,然而明不能別;呼先王以欺愚者而求衣食焉,得委積足以揜其口則揚揚如也;隨其長子,事其便辟,舉其上客,𠌼然若終身之虜而不敢有他志:是俗儒者也。法後王,一制度,隆禮義而殺《詩》、《書》,其言行已有大法矣,然而明不能齊法教之所不及,聞見之所未至,則知不能類也,知之曰知之,不知曰不知,內不自以誣,外不自以欺,以是尊賢畏法而不敢怠傲,是雅儒者也。法先王,統禮義,一制度,以淺持博,以古持今,以一持萬,苟仁義之類也,雖在鳥獸之中,若別白黑,倚物怪變,所未嘗聞也,所未嘗見也,卒然起一方,則舉統類而應之,無所儗㤰,張法而度之,則晻然若合符節,是大儒者也。故人主用俗人則萬乘之國亡,用俗儒則萬乘之國存,用雅儒則千乘之國安,用大儒則百里之地久而後三年,天下爲一,諸侯爲臣,用萬乘之國則舉錯而定,一朝而伯。

Zaofu was the best driver under heaven, but without a carriage and horses he had nowhere to show his ability. Yi (羿) was the best archer under heaven, but without a bow and arrows he had nowhere to show his skill. The great scholar is the one who is best at tuning all under heaven into one, but without a hundred li of land he has nowhere to show his merit.

If the carriage is sound and the horses are choice, and yet he cannot reach far and go a thousand li in a day, he is not Zaofu. If the bow is tuned and the arrows are straight, and yet he cannot shoot far and hit the small mark, he is not Yi. If he uses a hundred li of land and yet cannot tune all under heaven into one and cut the strong and the cruel to shape, he is not a great scholar.

That great scholar, though he hide in a poor lane and a leaking house with no land to set down an awl, is one whose name kings and dukes cannot fight him for. In the place of a single grandee, one ruler cannot keep him alone and one state cannot hold him alone, and his name is made beside the feudal lords, and there is none who does not wish to get him for a subject. Using a hundred li of land, no state of a thousand li can fight him for the victory: he whips and canes the cruel states and makes all under heaven even and one, and none can tip him over. This is the sign of the great scholar.

His words have their kinds, his conduct has ritual, in the affairs he undertakes there is no regret, and in holding to danger and answering change he fits at every turn. He moves with the times and bends and rises with the age, and through a thousand undertakings and ten thousand changes his way is one. This is the measure of the great scholar.

When he is blocked, the vulgar scholars laugh at him. When he goes through, the outstanding are changed by him, the lofty and the petty flee him, crooked doctrines fear him, and the common crowd is ashamed before him. Going through, he makes all under heaven one; blocked, he stands alone with an honored name. Heaven cannot kill it, earth cannot bury it, and an age of Jie and Robber Zhi cannot foul it. None but the great scholar can set it up, and Zhongni and Zi Gong (子弓) are such men.

So there is the vulgar man, there is the vulgar scholar, there is the correct scholar, and there is the great scholar.

He does not learn and does not ask, he has no correct right in him, and he takes wealth and benefit for what is high. This is the vulgar man.

Broad robe and shallow sash, his cap worn loose; he takes the former kings roughly for his law but is content with the arts of a disordered age; he learns awry and takes things up at random; he does not know how to take the later kings for law and make the institutions one, and does not know how to honor ritual and rightness and cut down the Odes and the Documents. His clothes and cap, his conduct and his shams, are already the same as common custom, and yet he does not know it is bad. His words and debates, his talk and speech, are already no different from Mozi's, and yet his clarity cannot tell them apart. He calls up the former kings to cheat the foolish and so seek clothing and food, and when he has got a store enough to cover his mouth he goes about puffed up. He follows the eldest son, serves the favorite, holds up the chief guest, and blankly, like a prisoner for life, dares have no other purpose. This is the vulgar scholar.

He takes the later kings for law, makes the institutions one, honors ritual and rightness and cuts down the Odes and the Documents, and his words and conduct already have a great law in them. Yet his clarity cannot make even what law and teaching do not reach, and where his hearing and seeing have not come, his knowledge cannot make kinds of it. What he knows he calls knowing, and what he does not know he calls not knowing; within he does not deceive himself and without he does not cheat himself. In this way he honors the worthy and fears the law and dares not be slack and haughty. This is the correct scholar.

He takes the former kings for law, gathers ritual and rightness under his hand, makes the institutions one, holds the broad by the shallow, holds the present by the old, holds the ten thousand by the one. If a thing is of the kind of benevolence and rightness, then even among birds and beasts he tells it as he tells white from black. Strange things and monstrous changes never heard of and never seen, rising of a sudden from one quarter, he takes up the guiding threads and the kinds and answers them, and there is nothing he hesitates over. He spreads out the law and measures by it, and dimly it is as though the halves of a tally were joined. This is the great scholar.

So if the ruler of men uses the vulgar man, a state of ten thousand chariots perishes. If he uses the vulgar scholar, a state of ten thousand chariots survives. If he uses the correct scholar, a state of a thousand chariots is at peace. If he uses the great scholar, then from a hundred li of land, in no long time, in three years, all under heaven becomes one and the feudal lords become his subjects. And if he uses him in a state of ten thousand chariots, the thing is settled as soon as it is set in place, and in one morning he is chief of the lords.

不聞不若聞之,聞之不若見之,見之不若知之,知之不若行之,學至於行之而止矣。行之,明也。明之爲聖人。聖人也者,本仁義,當是非,齊言行,不失豪釐,無它道焉,已乎行之矣。故聞之而不見,雖博必謬;見之而不知,雖識必妄;知之而不行,雖敦必困。不聞不見,則雖當,非仁也,其道百舉而百陷也。故人無師無法而知則必爲盜,勇則必爲賊,云能則必爲亂,察則必爲怪,辯則必爲誕。人有師有法而知則速通,勇則速畏,云能則速成,察則速盡,辯則速論。故有師法者,人之大寶也;無師法者,人之大殃也。人無師法則隆性矣,有師法則隆積矣,而師法者,所得乎積,非所受乎性,不足以獨立而治。性也者,吾所不能爲也,然而可化也;積也者,非吾所有也,然而可爲也。注錯習俗,所以化性也;幷一而不二,所以成積也。習俗移志,安久移質,幷一而不二則通於神明,參於天地矣。故積土而爲山,積水而爲海,旦暮積謂之歲。至高謂之天,至下謂之地,宇中六指謂之極;涂之人百姓積善而全盡謂之聖人。彼求之而後得,爲之而後成,積之而後高,盡之而後聖。故聖人也者,人之所積也。人積耨耕而爲農夫,積斲削而爲工匠,積反貨而爲商賈,積禮義而爲君子。工匠之子莫不繼事,而都國之民安習其服。居楚而楚,居越而越,居夏而夏,是非天性也,積靡使然也。故人知謹注錯,慎習俗,大積靡,則爲君子矣;縱情性而不足問學,則爲小人矣。爲君子則常安榮矣,爲小人則常危辱矣。凡人莫不欲安榮而惡危辱,故唯君子爲能得其所好,小人則日徼其所惡。《詩》曰:「維此良人,弗求弗迪;唯彼忍心,是顧是復。民之貪亂,寧爲荼毒。」此之謂也。

Not to hear is not as good as to hear it, to hear it is not as good as to see it, to see it is not as good as to know it, and to know it is not as good as to act on it. Learning comes to acting on it and stops there. Act on it and you are clear, and being clear you become a sage.

The sage roots himself in benevolence and rightness, fits right and wrong, makes words and conduct even, and does not miss by a hair's breadth. There is no other way. It ends in acting on it.

So to hear it and not see it, though he be broad, he is sure to be wrong. To see it and not know it, though he remember, he is sure to be deluded. To know it and not act on it, though he be earnest, he is sure to be blocked. Neither to hear it nor to see it, though he hit the mark, is not benevolence, and his way falls into the pit a hundred times in a hundred tries.

So if a man has no teacher and no law: if he is wise, he is sure to become a thief; if he is brave, he is sure to become a robber; if he claims ability, he is sure to make disorder; if he examines, he is sure to become strange; if he disputes, he is sure to become wild. If a man has a teacher and a law: if he is wise, he goes through quickly; if he is brave, awe comes to him quickly; if he claims ability, he achieves quickly; if he examines, he exhausts a thing quickly; if he disputes, he judges quickly.

So having a teacher and a law is a man's great treasure, and having no teacher and no law is a man's great calamity. A man with no teacher and no law honors his nature, and one with a teacher and a law honors what he heaps up. But the teacher and the law are got from heaping up and are not received from nature, and they are not enough to stand alone and order a man.

Nature is what I cannot make, and yet it can be changed. Heaping up is not what I have, and yet it can be made. Where a man sets himself down and the customs he practices are the means of changing his nature; joining into one and not making two is the means of completing what is heaped up. Practiced custom shifts the will, and long ease shifts what a man is made of. Join into one and do not make two, and he goes through to the bright spirits and makes a third with heaven and earth.

So heap up earth and it becomes a mountain, heap up water and it becomes a sea, and heap up mornings and evenings and it is called a year. The utmost high is called heaven, the utmost low is called earth, and the six directions within the universe are called the limits. When the man of the road and the hundred families heap up goodness and make it whole and complete, he is called a sage.

He seeks it and then gets it, does it and then completes it, heaps it up and then is high, exhausts it and then is a sage. So the sage is what a man has heaped up.

A man heaps up hoeing and plowing and becomes a farmer, heaps up cutting and shaving and becomes a craftsman, heaps up turning goods over and becomes a merchant, heaps up ritual and rightness and becomes a gentleman. There is no son of a craftsman who does not carry on the work, and the people of a capital or a state are at ease in the dress they are used to. Live in Chu and you are of Chu, live in Yue and you are of Yue, live in the Central Plain and you are of the Central Plain. This is not the nature given by heaven: it is heaping up and rubbing smooth that makes it so.

So if a man knows how to be careful where he sets himself down, careful of the customs he practices, and makes great his heaping up and rubbing smooth, he becomes a gentleman. If he lets his nature and feelings go loose and has not enough of asking and learning, he becomes a small man. Being a gentleman, he is always at ease and glorious; being a small man, he is always in danger and shame. There is no man who does not wish for ease and glory and hate danger and shame, and so only the gentleman can get what he likes, while the small man day by day calls down what he hates.

The Odes say, "This good man is neither sought nor brought forward; it is that hard heart alone that is looked to and turned back to again. The people covet disorder and would sooner have bitter poison." This is what is meant.

人論:志不免於曲私而冀人之以己爲公也,行不免於汙漫而冀人之以己爲修也,甚愚陋溝瞀而冀人之以己爲知也,是衆人也。志忍私然後能公,行忍情性然後能修,知而好問然後能才,公修而才,可謂小儒矣。志安公,行安修,知通統類,如是則可謂大儒矣。大儒者,天子三公也。小儒者,諸侯大夫士也。衆人者,工農商賈也。禮者,人主之所以爲羣臣寸尺尋丈檢式也,人倫盡矣。

Here men are ranked. His will does not escape being crooked and private, and yet he hopes men will take him for public-minded. His conduct does not escape being foul and loose, and yet he hopes men will take him for cultivated. He is deeply foolish and narrow, in a ditch and blind, and yet he hopes men will take him for wise. This is the common crowd.

Only when his will bears down what is private can he be public-minded. Only when his conduct bears down his nature and feelings can he be cultivated. Only when he is wise and loves to ask can he have talent. Public-minded, cultivated and talented, he can be called a small scholar.

His will is at ease in being public-minded, his conduct is at ease in being cultivated, and his knowledge goes through the guiding threads and the kinds. Such a man can be called a great scholar.

The great scholar is one of the three dukes of the Son of Heaven. The small scholar is a grandee or a scholar under the feudal lords. The common crowd are craftsmen, farmers and merchants.

Ritual is the measuring stick by which the ruler of men takes the inch and the foot, the fathom and the ten-foot rod of his host of subjects. The ordering of men is complete in this.

君子言有壇宇,行有防表,道有一隆。言道德之求,不下於安存;言志意之求,不下於上;言道德之求,不二後王。道過三代謂之蕩,法二後王謂之不雅。高之下之,小之臣之,不外是矣,是君子之所以騁志意於壇宇宮廷也。故諸侯問政不及安存,則不告也;匹夫問學不及爲士,則不教也;百家之說不及後王,則不聽也。夫是之謂君子言有壇宇,行有防表也。

The gentleman's words have a yard and a house, his conduct has a dyke and a marker, and his way has one height.

When he speaks of what is sought in the way and in virtue, he does not go below being at peace and surviving. When he speaks of what is sought in the will, he does not go below the highest. When he speaks of what is sought in the way and in virtue, he does not make two of the later kings.

A way that goes back beyond the three dynasties is called loose, and a law that makes two of the later kings is called not correct. Raising a man up and putting him down, making him small and making him a subject, none of this goes outside this. This is how the gentleman gallops his will in the yard and the house, in palace and court.

So when a feudal lord asks about government and does not come up to being at peace and surviving, he is not told. When a common man asks about learning and does not come up to becoming a scholar, he is not taught. When the talk of the hundred schools does not come up to the later kings, it is not listened to. This is what is meant by the gentleman's words having a yard and a house and his conduct having a dyke and a marker.